828 mk3 is real

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
dubsr6
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:20 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by dubsr6 »

you have no idea how pissed i am about this. I just bought the mk2 after christmas, i even called a motu sales rep and asked them if a mk3 was coming out in the near future, he lied to me and said as of right now, we have no plans for a mk3 release of the 828. That was the main reason i went out and got one.

update --

I just called GC and they said they will give me store credit, they also just called Motu, as to when they can ship me the new mk3.

Man i was telling my friend, watch i buy one and they release a mk3.

so pissed.
User avatar
jgest
Posts: 2230
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:35 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: sebastopol, CA

Post by jgest »

dubsr6 wrote:you have no idea how pissed i am about this. I just bought the mk2 after christmas, i even called a motu sales rep and asked them if a mk3 was coming out in the near future, he lied to me and said as of right now, we have no plans for a mk3 release of the 828. That was the main reason i went out and got one.

update --

I just called GC and they said they will give me store credit, they also just called Motu, as to when they can ship me the new mk3.

Man i was telling my friend, watch i buy one and they release a mk3.

so pissed.
having taken a few dipped in glass gear wise over the years, I finally learned never to buy gear late nov- january until namm......unless of course it is a professional emergency.
Macbook pro, 3 gigs of ram, osx 10.62, Dp 5.13, Live 8.1.2, Reason 4, Tc powercore Virus, Albino 3.02, proper ergonomic sitting posture, plenty of coffee (french press only with a pinch of cardamon added)
My dp inspired music.....
http://www.myspace.com/aislingbeing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/wigginsmaroo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=10004" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
dubsr6
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:20 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by dubsr6 »

good tip, i will always abid by that in the future. On a good note, i called GC they are allowing me to return the mk2 for the mk3, get this...

for the same price, ha. so i am getting the mk 3 for 650.00. He already called the motu rep, only catch is, he said they wont ship till mid feb. so i have to wait. i need to return the mk2 by feb 8th, before my month is up.

i really hope the upgrade in hardware is worth all this nonsense though...

reading the reports it seem like it :)

I am a happy camper then, just hope i dont have to deal with first generation production bugs:(
dubsr6
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:20 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by dubsr6 »

can anyone answer what is the benifit of having the main outs changed to XLR instead of the 1/4 in that the mk2 had?

Is it a better quality sound coming out?

not sure why motu would change that.
User avatar
jgest
Posts: 2230
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:35 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: sebastopol, CA

Post by jgest »

dubsr6 wrote:can anyone answer what is the benifit of having the main outs changed to XLR instead of the 1/4 in that the mk2 had?

Is it a better quality sound coming out?

not sure why motu would change that.
many monitors have xlr inputs.
Macbook pro, 3 gigs of ram, osx 10.62, Dp 5.13, Live 8.1.2, Reason 4, Tc powercore Virus, Albino 3.02, proper ergonomic sitting posture, plenty of coffee (french press only with a pinch of cardamon added)
My dp inspired music.....
http://www.myspace.com/aislingbeing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.myspace.com/wigginsmaroo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=10004" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
pcm
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: woodstock, ny

Post by pcm »

I don't know of this was covered, but I am wondering if it will be possible to RECORD the EQ generated by CuemixDSP. In other words, if one opens an eq within Cuemix on a tracking session, will that eq be recorded? Just for high-pass filters alone, this would be super handy for me.
User avatar
Frodo
Posts: 15598
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: The Shire

Post by Frodo »

pcm wrote:I don't know of this was covered, but I am wondering if it will be possible to RECORD the EQ generated by CuemixDSP. In other words, if one opens an eq within Cuemix on a tracking session, will that eq be recorded? Just for high-pass filters alone, this would be super handy for me.
Isn't it already possible to route CueMix signal back into DP via "Bounce Back"?
motu wrote:A new "CueMix Bounce Back" feature lets you route one of the four CueMix DSP mixes back to the computer. This allows you to record your entire mix
"New" as of 828mk2.
6,1 MacPro, 96GB RAM, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, DP 11.33
User avatar
Obscure Object
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Alexandria

Post by Obscure Object »

pcm wrote:I don't know of this was covered, but I am wondering if it will be possible to RECORD the EQ generated by CuemixDSP. In other words, if one opens an eq within Cuemix on a tracking session, will that eq be recorded? Just for high-pass filters alone, this would be super handy for me.
Yes, I read on the Motu site that u you have the option to record the signal dry (with wet monitoring) or wet.
Her nose was not really a nose at all. It was only a beginning.
User avatar
Aramis
Posts: 1168
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Lac Beauport

Post by Aramis »

This is the way to go far with the signal with less noise .

So , I would say , yes it is a better way .

I even wish there were all the surround outputs like that !

Aramis
dubsr6 wrote:can anyone answer what is the benifit of having the main outs changed to XLR instead of the 1/4 in that the mk2 had?

Is it a better quality sound coming out?

not sure why motu would change that.
iMac 2012 27 ' 3.2 ghz 32 gigs ram OSX 10.9.4 DigitalPerformer 8.7 , MOTU Track 16, MOTU MachFive3.2, Ethno and BPM , Komplete 9, OmniSphere , Trilian and Stylus RMX , Axon mkII and Godin LG .
TuomasP
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:04 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by TuomasP »

I just ordered a mk3. I hope I can use the eq in the master stereo out. I need to attenuate 2 frequencies slightly to correct the room response.

Anybody have one yet? They are in stock in a couple of places.
User avatar
Aramis
Posts: 1168
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Lac Beauport

Post by Aramis »

TuomasP wrote:I just ordered a mk3. I hope I can use the eq in the master stereo out. I need to attenuate 2 frequencies slightly to correct the room response.

Anybody have one yet? They are in stock in a couple of places.
Where ?
Aramis
iMac 2012 27 ' 3.2 ghz 32 gigs ram OSX 10.9.4 DigitalPerformer 8.7 , MOTU Track 16, MOTU MachFive3.2, Ethno and BPM , Komplete 9, OmniSphere , Trilian and Stylus RMX , Axon mkII and Godin LG .
fokof
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Post by fokof »

Anybody has tried one ?


Would be curious to know how the DSP sounds.
I'm looking for one to act as small digital board and wonder if it would do the job.
metakinetics
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:58 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

The MK3

Post by metakinetics »

I just picked one up at my local clackamas oregon guitar center for $749. I am curious to see how bad the public beta testing is going to be. The guy was nice enough to extend the return period from 14 days to 30 due to my driver concerns for new interfaces. I hear there are currently 4 main issues people are experiencing intermittently:

1. Outputs are somewhat too hot, requiring serious attenuation of levels for active monitors.
2. Random screeching noises. Seems unrelated to FireWire bus.
3. Issues chaining it with other MOTU devices such as the MKii or traveler.
4. Headphone output is reported to be inseparable from main volume knob.

I am having faith in my first ever MOTU purchase, willing to public beta test it with my brand new 24 inch alum iMac and Logic. I am hoping to see a solid sound quality upgrade compared to my Fast Track Pro. The DDS clock technology looks as promising as JETpll, and nothing in this price range can compete with the features! Expect to hear reports shortly.
pcm
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: woodstock, ny

Post by pcm »

Welcome. But I think you are late to the party to be "beta testing" it. I've had mine for over a month, as many users here have. No problems here.
newrigel

Post by newrigel »

Aramis wrote:This is the way to go far with the signal with less noise .

So , I would say , yes it is a better way .

I even wish there were all the surround outputs like that !

Aramis
dubsr6 wrote:can anyone answer what is the benifit of having the main outs changed to XLR instead of the 1/4 in that the mk2 had?

Is it a better quality sound coming out?

not sure why motu would change that.
Balanced is balanced whether it's coming from an XLR or a 1/4"...
Post Reply