MOTUnation.com

Seems like things are turning to what I thought would indeed happen.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/16/dell_eyes_apple/

Dell to Offer License Mac OS on PC's - speculation.

Originally posted by composer11: Originally posted by thermos: Yeah, and the worst part is is that it records poorly at high work priority also. (clicks pops etc). I did report this to RME, because they didn't believe that work priority makes a difference. Hopefully they care, we'll see....... Plug...

Originally posted by thermos: Yeah, and the worst part is is that it records poorly at high work priority also. (clicks pops etc). I did report this to RME, because they didn't believe that work priority makes a difference. Hopefully they care, we'll see....... Plug in latency definitely was spot o...

Originally posted by RBS:

FINALLY!

MOTU acknowledges what we've all been wondering in a statement posted on their website today...

What am I missing here???

Didn't see anything,,,,what ....was it pulled already?!?!?!?!?

FWIW, I took the dream on a little personal too! Anyway, what excites me is not the fact that there may be MAC clones, either from other vendors or hacked, but for the first time, there is hope that the x86 instruction set will allow users that have invested in the "PC" with it's x86/*.exe...

HP branded Macs? I could see that happening but only as a means of additional disti channels for Apple.[/QB] Ok, fair enough, however, let me give you an example of how some OEM vendors are - in Tawain a few years back, a major motherboard manufacture DID NOT get an INTEL license for a "said&q...

Originally posted by composer11: Originally posted by Splinter: . Dream on. Won't happen.[/QB] ah-huh, and Mac will never us x86, intel or AMD right? (grin)[/QB][/QUOTE] Funny, After reading this comment, dream on, here is a new story that speaks of HP selling MACS - - target, MICROSOFT..... everth...

Originally posted by Splinter:
.[/qb]

Dream on. Won't happen.[/QB][/QUOTE]

ah-huh, and Mac will never us x86, intel or AMD right? (grin)

Originally posted by dougieb: I wonder why they didn't go with AMD... Hmmm... Personally, I'm diggin' the AMD stuff a lot more than the Intel stuff on the PC side. ~d Easy, Intel has the $$, marketing and branding. If it's x86 code, let intel work it all out with APPL, then, when AMD pushes the env...

Originally posted by TimeMist: The point is that Apple is truly moving itself into battle by going into the belly of the beast. Others have tried it too, so be careful of making the logical leap that people will flock to OSX because it is better. While it is true that OSX is better, the market has ...

Originally posted by Blueflame: Finally, I doubt MOTU will close its doors because of this. I've spent time with MOTU insiders and they always know what's coming long before we do. As Jobs said, OSX has been living a double life. No doubt MOTU will be included in their field testing before we ever ...

Originally posted by TimeMist: Originally posted by composer11: This is exactly where most people are wrong - if source code is coded to x86, in less techinical terms, it would run on MAC or PC hardware. I agree with you with one caveat. Cnet ran an interview yesterday with one of the Apple SVP's w...

Originally posted by Juan Alexei: Some coments on the whole thread. 1) Apple did not say they were switching to PC but to x86. Don't expect running MacOS X on a standard PC. Apple could even switch back to PPC or other processor available in the future. This is exactly where most people are wrong -...

The only thing I don't get is if it indeed is x86 then this means, Intel and Better, AMD X2 64 chips would work. The chip has nothing to do with WiNDOZE, however, if this is true, and Apple does run x86, then this would mean a user could build a MAC with his/her own parts and buy the MAC OS. I'm won...

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Twinner:
[QB]There are just as many reports out there calling this story complete oobliagah.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/23/why_apple_wont_embrace_intel/

That article is dated May and the announcment was today.