Bidule uses a lot of cpu

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Post Reply
prjacobs
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:31 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by prjacobs »

Hi,
I have bidule up and running with DP 6.02, but I don't see a difference in cpu usage. It seems the same as just loading them in without it. I understand that with bidule, you're supposed to be able to exceed the 2GB memory usage, but having done this, I'm still running into cpu overload quickly and it defeats the purpose of using it.

Thanks,
Paul
tripit@earthlink.net
Posts: 744
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Hollywood, CA.

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by tripit@earthlink.net »

I use it all the time, no cpu issue at all.
What are you system spec's?
prjacobs
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:31 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by prjacobs »

I've got a 2.8Mhz, 8 core with 18GB of ram.
User avatar
Dwetmaster
Posts: 3491
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:59 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by Dwetmaster »

Wow you definitely shouldn't be hitting any walls with a computer like that.
MacPro 8Core 2.8GHZ 16GB RAM OSX10.8.3
MacBook Pro 17" Unibody 2011 OSX10.8.3
896mk3, BLA Modded 896HD, BLA Microclock, MTP-AV, Yamaha KX-8, CME VX-7 Mackie Ctrl, megadrum, Presonus C-S,
DP8.04, Bidule, M5 3, Ethno 2, BPM 1.5 Kontakt4, BFD2, SD2, Omnisphere, Wave Arts P-S5, Altiverb7, PSP VW & OldTimer, VB3, Ivory 2 Grand, True Pianos, Ozone 5, Reason 4, AmpliTube3, Bla bla bla...
A few El & Ac basses & Guitars, Hammond A-100.
jlaudon
Posts: 1655
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by jlaudon »

I've been using Bidule with Dp6.02 on my 2.26 8 core, and other than the memory advantage, I also find that about the same CPU is used (as in using the VIs in DP).

The downside of using Bidule (unless I'm missing something, maybe someone can help me out) is that when I change DP's buffer to 1024, there is that audio delay, and the tracks are recorded like this - I'm aware I can move the MIDI forward, but is there another option?
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
dix
Posts: 3098
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by dix »

jlaudon wrote: The downside of using Bidule (unless I'm missing something, maybe someone can help me out) is that when I change DP's buffer to 1024, there is that audio delay, and the tracks are recorded like this - I'm aware I can move the MIDI forward, but is there another option?
How are you sending MIDI to Bidule? I've only tried it w a 512 buffer, but the last post in this thread explains how I get latency free MIDI w Bidule:

http://www.motunation.com/forum/viewtop ... =1&t=35516

Also, I have Bidule maxed with VIs and DP seems to run with a substantially reduced CPU hit. More or less like it has only one or two light VIs running.
Last edited by dix on Sat May 23, 2009 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
14-inch MBP M1 Max (2021), 13.6.x, 64GB RAM, UAD Quad Tb Satellite, 4 displays ::: 2009 4,1 > 5,1 MacPro 12-core 3.33 ghz , 10.14.x, 96GB RAM, GeForce GTX 770 , NewerTech eSATA/USB3 PCIe Host Adapter, UAD-2 Quad, ::: 15-inch MBP (2015) 10.14.x, 16GB RAM ::: Lynx Aurora (n) USB ::: DP (latest version), Vienna Ensemble Pro danwool.com
JZilla
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Canada

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by JZilla »

I'm having the same problems (high CPU hit, big latency at 1024) with DP 6.02, OSX 10.5.7, Kontakt 3.5, and a Quad 2.66 GHz MacPro with 16 gigs of RAM.
2019 MacPro, 10.15.5, 16 core 3.2 GHz, 384 GB RAM
DP 10.11
Kontakt 6.2.2, Spectrasonics, u-he, Arturia, NI Komplete 11, VE Pro
UAD, Waves, Soundtoys, Slate, FabFilter
jlaudon
Posts: 1655
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by jlaudon »

MIDI is using Bidule 1, Bidule 2, etc... at 512 playback is acceptable (and inputting notes as well). Does anyone else get this latency at 1024?
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
dix
Posts: 3098
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by dix »

jlaudon wrote:MIDI is using Bidule 1, Bidule 2, etc... at 512 playback is acceptable (and inputting notes as well). Does anyone else get this latency at 1024?
Check out that thread I posted above. You need to use the ReWire module for MIDI input not Bidule 1, Bidule 2 etc.if you want Bidule to be part of DP's ADC scheme.
14-inch MBP M1 Max (2021), 13.6.x, 64GB RAM, UAD Quad Tb Satellite, 4 displays ::: 2009 4,1 > 5,1 MacPro 12-core 3.33 ghz , 10.14.x, 96GB RAM, GeForce GTX 770 , NewerTech eSATA/USB3 PCIe Host Adapter, UAD-2 Quad, ::: 15-inch MBP (2015) 10.14.x, 16GB RAM ::: Lynx Aurora (n) USB ::: DP (latest version), Vienna Ensemble Pro danwool.com
jlaudon
Posts: 1655
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by jlaudon »

Thanks Dix, that's helpful - I'll try it out later today.
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
User avatar
Gabe S.
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: LA

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by Gabe S. »

JZilla wrote:I'm having the same problems (high CPU hit, big latency at 1024) with DP 6.02, OSX 10.5.7, Kontakt 3.5, and a Quad 2.66 GHz MacPro with 16 gigs of RAM.
Hi.

Just a thought regarding Kontakt 3.5 in your setup. The current public beta of K3.5 is WAY less efficient than K2 on the cpu in DP----and it's REALLY quite worse---as in unusable worse---if the Kontakt Memory Server is on.

I've been trying the public beta test of K3.5 and I noted my experiences on the NI public beta site with some example movies showing the different CPU usages between K2 and K3.5. Check it out:

http://www.native-instruments.com/forum ... hp?t=86145

NI says that this will be addressed in a future version, but I wonder if you tried pulling up Kontakt 2 (if you have it) if you'd have less performance issues.

Cheers.
-gabe
Computer: 2019 Mac Pro 28-core 2.5gHz, OS 10.15.2, 96GB ram, all SSD/NVME drives, MH Labs ULN-8, MOTU MidiTimepiece AV
DP Setup: DP10.11, all Spectrasonics VIs, all Waves plugins, Sonnox AU, Altiverb, NI Komplete 12/K5+6, Plogue Bidule 64 as VI host
dix
Posts: 3098
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by dix »

The current public beta of K3.5 is WAY less efficient than K2 on the cpu in DP----
How about K3.0? There's been dramatic changes in 3.5's RAM implementation etc. has there not? How's K3 stack up to K2 and K3.5?

It's important to note that I'm running 7 instances of Kontakt 3.02 with 14 to 16 Symphobia channels each plus two heavily loaded Play instances in Bidule (the max RAM allows) and DP barely notices CPU-wise and is very stable. I couldn't even think of running all that in DP alone.
14-inch MBP M1 Max (2021), 13.6.x, 64GB RAM, UAD Quad Tb Satellite, 4 displays ::: 2009 4,1 > 5,1 MacPro 12-core 3.33 ghz , 10.14.x, 96GB RAM, GeForce GTX 770 , NewerTech eSATA/USB3 PCIe Host Adapter, UAD-2 Quad, ::: 15-inch MBP (2015) 10.14.x, 16GB RAM ::: Lynx Aurora (n) USB ::: DP (latest version), Vienna Ensemble Pro danwool.com
User avatar
Gabe S.
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: LA

Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu

Post by Gabe S. »

dix wrote:How about K3.0? There's been dramatic changes in 3.5's RAM implementation etc. has there not? How's K3 stack up to K2 and K3.5?
I don't know how K3.02 stacks up to the others. The K3.5 beta overwrites 3.02, and I'm not going to uninstall 3.5 and reinstall 3.02 just to test 3.02 for performance. (Since K2 has always been so stable for me, I've never really used K3 even though I have it via Komplete 5.)

-gabe
Computer: 2019 Mac Pro 28-core 2.5gHz, OS 10.15.2, 96GB ram, all SSD/NVME drives, MH Labs ULN-8, MOTU MidiTimepiece AV
DP Setup: DP10.11, all Spectrasonics VIs, all Waves plugins, Sonnox AU, Altiverb, NI Komplete 12/K5+6, Plogue Bidule 64 as VI host
Post Reply