Bidule uses a lot of cpu
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Bidule uses a lot of cpu
Hi,
I have bidule up and running with DP 6.02, but I don't see a difference in cpu usage. It seems the same as just loading them in without it. I understand that with bidule, you're supposed to be able to exceed the 2GB memory usage, but having done this, I'm still running into cpu overload quickly and it defeats the purpose of using it.
Thanks,
Paul
I have bidule up and running with DP 6.02, but I don't see a difference in cpu usage. It seems the same as just loading them in without it. I understand that with bidule, you're supposed to be able to exceed the 2GB memory usage, but having done this, I'm still running into cpu overload quickly and it defeats the purpose of using it.
Thanks,
Paul
-
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Hollywood, CA.
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
I use it all the time, no cpu issue at all.
What are you system spec's?
What are you system spec's?
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
I've got a 2.8Mhz, 8 core with 18GB of ram.
- Dwetmaster
- Posts: 3491
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:59 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Montreal Canada
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
Wow you definitely shouldn't be hitting any walls with a computer like that.
MacPro 8Core 2.8GHZ 16GB RAM OSX10.8.3
MacBook Pro 17" Unibody 2011 OSX10.8.3
896mk3, BLA Modded 896HD, BLA Microclock, MTP-AV, Yamaha KX-8, CME VX-7 Mackie Ctrl, megadrum, Presonus C-S,
DP8.04, Bidule, M5 3, Ethno 2, BPM 1.5 Kontakt4, BFD2, SD2, Omnisphere, Wave Arts P-S5, Altiverb7, PSP VW & OldTimer, VB3, Ivory 2 Grand, True Pianos, Ozone 5, Reason 4, AmpliTube3, Bla bla bla...
A few El & Ac basses & Guitars, Hammond A-100.
MacBook Pro 17" Unibody 2011 OSX10.8.3
896mk3, BLA Modded 896HD, BLA Microclock, MTP-AV, Yamaha KX-8, CME VX-7 Mackie Ctrl, megadrum, Presonus C-S,
DP8.04, Bidule, M5 3, Ethno 2, BPM 1.5 Kontakt4, BFD2, SD2, Omnisphere, Wave Arts P-S5, Altiverb7, PSP VW & OldTimer, VB3, Ivory 2 Grand, True Pianos, Ozone 5, Reason 4, AmpliTube3, Bla bla bla...
A few El & Ac basses & Guitars, Hammond A-100.
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
I've been using Bidule with Dp6.02 on my 2.26 8 core, and other than the memory advantage, I also find that about the same CPU is used (as in using the VIs in DP).
The downside of using Bidule (unless I'm missing something, maybe someone can help me out) is that when I change DP's buffer to 1024, there is that audio delay, and the tracks are recorded like this - I'm aware I can move the MIDI forward, but is there another option?
The downside of using Bidule (unless I'm missing something, maybe someone can help me out) is that when I change DP's buffer to 1024, there is that audio delay, and the tracks are recorded like this - I'm aware I can move the MIDI forward, but is there another option?
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
-
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
How are you sending MIDI to Bidule? I've only tried it w a 512 buffer, but the last post in this thread explains how I get latency free MIDI w Bidule:jlaudon wrote: The downside of using Bidule (unless I'm missing something, maybe someone can help me out) is that when I change DP's buffer to 1024, there is that audio delay, and the tracks are recorded like this - I'm aware I can move the MIDI forward, but is there another option?
http://www.motunation.com/forum/viewtop ... =1&t=35516
Also, I have Bidule maxed with VIs and DP seems to run with a substantially reduced CPU hit. More or less like it has only one or two light VIs running.
Last edited by dix on Sat May 23, 2009 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
14-inch MBP M1 Max (2021), 13.6.x, 64GB RAM, UAD Quad Tb Satellite, 4 displays ::: 2009 4,1 > 5,1 MacPro 12-core 3.33 ghz , 10.14.x, 96GB RAM, GeForce GTX 770 , NewerTech eSATA/USB3 PCIe Host Adapter, UAD-2 Quad, ::: 15-inch MBP (2015) 10.14.x, 16GB RAM ::: Lynx Aurora (n) USB ::: DP (latest version), Vienna Ensemble Pro danwool.com
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
I'm having the same problems (high CPU hit, big latency at 1024) with DP 6.02, OSX 10.5.7, Kontakt 3.5, and a Quad 2.66 GHz MacPro with 16 gigs of RAM.
2019 MacPro, 10.15.5, 16 core 3.2 GHz, 384 GB RAM
DP 10.11
Kontakt 6.2.2, Spectrasonics, u-he, Arturia, NI Komplete 11, VE Pro
UAD, Waves, Soundtoys, Slate, FabFilter
DP 10.11
Kontakt 6.2.2, Spectrasonics, u-he, Arturia, NI Komplete 11, VE Pro
UAD, Waves, Soundtoys, Slate, FabFilter
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
MIDI is using Bidule 1, Bidule 2, etc... at 512 playback is acceptable (and inputting notes as well). Does anyone else get this latency at 1024?
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
-
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
Check out that thread I posted above. You need to use the ReWire module for MIDI input not Bidule 1, Bidule 2 etc.if you want Bidule to be part of DP's ADC scheme.jlaudon wrote:MIDI is using Bidule 1, Bidule 2, etc... at 512 playback is acceptable (and inputting notes as well). Does anyone else get this latency at 1024?
14-inch MBP M1 Max (2021), 13.6.x, 64GB RAM, UAD Quad Tb Satellite, 4 displays ::: 2009 4,1 > 5,1 MacPro 12-core 3.33 ghz , 10.14.x, 96GB RAM, GeForce GTX 770 , NewerTech eSATA/USB3 PCIe Host Adapter, UAD-2 Quad, ::: 15-inch MBP (2015) 10.14.x, 16GB RAM ::: Lynx Aurora (n) USB ::: DP (latest version), Vienna Ensemble Pro danwool.com
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
Thanks Dix, that's helpful - I'll try it out later today.
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
Hi.JZilla wrote:I'm having the same problems (high CPU hit, big latency at 1024) with DP 6.02, OSX 10.5.7, Kontakt 3.5, and a Quad 2.66 GHz MacPro with 16 gigs of RAM.
Just a thought regarding Kontakt 3.5 in your setup. The current public beta of K3.5 is WAY less efficient than K2 on the cpu in DP----and it's REALLY quite worse---as in unusable worse---if the Kontakt Memory Server is on.
I've been trying the public beta test of K3.5 and I noted my experiences on the NI public beta site with some example movies showing the different CPU usages between K2 and K3.5. Check it out:
http://www.native-instruments.com/forum ... hp?t=86145
NI says that this will be addressed in a future version, but I wonder if you tried pulling up Kontakt 2 (if you have it) if you'd have less performance issues.
Cheers.
-gabe
Computer: 2019 Mac Pro 28-core 2.5gHz, OS 10.15.2, 96GB ram, all SSD/NVME drives, MH Labs ULN-8, MOTU MidiTimepiece AV
DP Setup: DP10.11, all Spectrasonics VIs, all Waves plugins, Sonnox AU, Altiverb, NI Komplete 12/K5+6, Plogue Bidule 64 as VI host
DP Setup: DP10.11, all Spectrasonics VIs, all Waves plugins, Sonnox AU, Altiverb, NI Komplete 12/K5+6, Plogue Bidule 64 as VI host
-
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
How about K3.0? There's been dramatic changes in 3.5's RAM implementation etc. has there not? How's K3 stack up to K2 and K3.5?The current public beta of K3.5 is WAY less efficient than K2 on the cpu in DP----
It's important to note that I'm running 7 instances of Kontakt 3.02 with 14 to 16 Symphobia channels each plus two heavily loaded Play instances in Bidule (the max RAM allows) and DP barely notices CPU-wise and is very stable. I couldn't even think of running all that in DP alone.
14-inch MBP M1 Max (2021), 13.6.x, 64GB RAM, UAD Quad Tb Satellite, 4 displays ::: 2009 4,1 > 5,1 MacPro 12-core 3.33 ghz , 10.14.x, 96GB RAM, GeForce GTX 770 , NewerTech eSATA/USB3 PCIe Host Adapter, UAD-2 Quad, ::: 15-inch MBP (2015) 10.14.x, 16GB RAM ::: Lynx Aurora (n) USB ::: DP (latest version), Vienna Ensemble Pro danwool.com
Re: Bidule uses a lot of cpu
I don't know how K3.02 stacks up to the others. The K3.5 beta overwrites 3.02, and I'm not going to uninstall 3.5 and reinstall 3.02 just to test 3.02 for performance. (Since K2 has always been so stable for me, I've never really used K3 even though I have it via Komplete 5.)dix wrote:How about K3.0? There's been dramatic changes in 3.5's RAM implementation etc. has there not? How's K3 stack up to K2 and K3.5?
-gabe
Computer: 2019 Mac Pro 28-core 2.5gHz, OS 10.15.2, 96GB ram, all SSD/NVME drives, MH Labs ULN-8, MOTU MidiTimepiece AV
DP Setup: DP10.11, all Spectrasonics VIs, all Waves plugins, Sonnox AU, Altiverb, NI Komplete 12/K5+6, Plogue Bidule 64 as VI host
DP Setup: DP10.11, all Spectrasonics VIs, all Waves plugins, Sonnox AU, Altiverb, NI Komplete 12/K5+6, Plogue Bidule 64 as VI host