DP 6.02 and latency

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Post Reply
User avatar
angelvonfrankim
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:23 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Texas
Contact:

DP 6.02 and latency

Post by angelvonfrankim »

Using DP with VIs or POD Farm has such bad latency that it is unusable. At least the way I am set up. ANyone have any ideas?

Why can't DP work as well as GarageBand?
Just Frank,
( :^ | =

Dual 2.5 GHz PowerPC G5, 2.5 GB SDRAM, Tiger 10.4.11, DP 6.01, 2408, 896, LiquidMix, Waves Platinum, AutoTune 5
User avatar
kassonica
Posts: 5231
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: DP 6.02 and latency

Post by kassonica »

angelvonfrankim wrote:Using DP with VIs or POD Farm has such bad latency that it is unusable. At least the way I am set up. ANyone have any ideas?

Why can't DP work as well as GarageBand?
Um

Do you have a manual?

Do you know HOW to adjust the buffers?
Creativity, some digital stuff and analogue things that go boom. crackle, bits of wood with strings on them that go twang
User avatar
angelvonfrankim
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:23 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: DP 6.02 and latency

Post by angelvonfrankim »

Yep. I have a manual.

I set the buffer low (512) and there is still too much latency to be able to accurately trigger Model12 with a USB Keystation.

Is the only thing that helps setting the buffer lower? Any lower and I won't be able to use Liquid Mix.
Just Frank,
( :^ | =

Dual 2.5 GHz PowerPC G5, 2.5 GB SDRAM, Tiger 10.4.11, DP 6.01, 2408, 896, LiquidMix, Waves Platinum, AutoTune 5
User avatar
kassonica
Posts: 5231
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: DP 6.02 and latency

Post by kassonica »

angelvonfrankim wrote:Yep. I have a manual.

I set the buffer low (512) and there is still too much latency to be able to accurately trigger Model12 with a USB Keystation.

Is the only thing that helps setting the buffer lower? Any lower and I won't be able to use Liquid Mix.

Could you track without the Liquid mix?

It's not really DP then is it?
Creativity, some digital stuff and analogue things that go boom. crackle, bits of wood with strings on them that go twang
User avatar
Mr_Clifford
Posts: 2430
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:56 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Contact:

Re: DP 6.02 and latency

Post by Mr_Clifford »

angelvonfrankim wrote:Yep. I have a manual.

I set the buffer low (512) and there is still too much latency to be able to accurately trigger Model12 with a USB Keystation.

Is the only thing that helps setting the buffer lower? Any lower and I won't be able to use Liquid Mix.
512 is generally not low enough for percussion stuff. I'm happy with 256, but some prefer 128. It takes a bit of juggling, but you're best off doing the programming with as many other non-essential plug-ins turned off - and don't have any other insert FX on the VI Instrument track (also, route it straight to the main audio output).

Two other tricks are to host your VI on a separate computer or run stand-alone mode and route the MIDI via IAC.
DP 9.52 Mac Pro 10.14.6 RME fireface800. Sibelius. Dorico 4
User avatar
sdfalk
Posts: 2514
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Re: DP 6.02 and latency

Post by sdfalk »

From a Focusrute page;

It is worth bearing in mind that the Liquid Mix has been designed first and foremost as a mixing device, rather than a tracking device. The latency is a price paid for the round trip journey over the FireWire bus, as well as for the complexity of the dynamic convolution. For a mixing device, this is an appropriate compromise. However, for tracking, the Liquid Mix may not be suitable in all cases.

This is the link:
http://www.focusrite.com/answerbase/en/ ... php?id=283

Having had some experience with both Uad2 and firewire based plugin solutions, this is unfortunately the way it is.
The Throughput on PCI express being soooo much faster then firewire.

Sorry..
I should add;
I would think it would be a bit problematic to track with any sequencer using a firewire based fx processor.
I may be wrong though.
A 2018 Mac mini with 16 gb of ram
HUGE bunch o' AU instruments/fx...
A Metric Halo ULN8-3D…mmmmmmm
Remember to eat all your fruits and vegetables!
My OS is The amazingly gratuitous 10.14
Post Reply