MIDI Life Crisis wrote:
Please don't characterize what I like and what I don't like. I'm a big boy, I can speak for myself, and both these comments are grossly inaccurate.
As far as the jabs at my "snooty classical sensibility" please know that I am neither a conservatory nor a university trained musician (I only taught at a university. lol) My roots are as a rock drummer and guitarist. Again, please don't assume that I don't know about popular genres just because I don't embrace them in my own work.
I went out of my way to be nice in responding to this subject. Apparently, that's just not good enough for some folks. I see that as their problem, not mine.
Mike, from my part, I'm quite surprised you tell me that...
To which jabs are you referring to?
It's as if you suddenly switched the goal-post or confuse me with someone else and completely misunderstood what I meant.
I thought it was quite obvious I was making a point and directly referring to things you've been saying like this:
MIDI Life Crisis wrote:
... but does he loop the expression of those rhythms identically every time. Only a discerning ear can tell, and therein lies the rub. "Real live musicians" playing live on an instrument don't play loops. They may play repeats, but that is not the same thing.
However hard you try, you simply cannot take the art of creating music and dumb it down to fit the technology available to you as the thing that music is. Again, if you can make a living making and/or using loops, great. But that is very different from actually performing music.
You've said multiple times you don't like loops nor working with them. But then it seems you connected my commentary of you not liking them to my next sentence about many electronic styles requiring loops, as if I were dissing you or implying you're not qualified to talk about this, or something...
No! Not at all. At least
I didn't.
On the contrary. I was even
agreeing with you about your
human performance comments.
That's why I even bolded my main point in the paragraph...
FMiguelez wrote: IOW, that which MLC doesn't like (cloned repetitions) ARE part of many electronic genres. And that, I agree, where human performers are involved, loops do sound lazy and plain bad and not very musical. They just don't sound like a good authentic "human" performance (presuming that's what you're after). So it all depends on the genre/style, does it not?
...which, in the context of your previous commentary, it just means that their "correct" usage and their effectiveness in the music is mostly
genre-dependent. That's all.
Nothing about me "characterizing you" in any way...
It actually seemed to me
you were sort of dissing loop-usage a little, in an extremely broad context, thus my (perhaps poorly-written) answer.
But in no way did I mean to disrespect you, so I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Come on, Mike. You know how much I admire you!
Please notice
I never even said anything about your electronic capabilities or your "classical sensitivities" or training.
Are you sure you meant to refer to me there in that answer? 