Macintels are out!!!!

Macintosh software/hardware discussion and troubleshooting

Moderator: James Steele

Jaysplace101
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Colorado

Macintels are out!!!!

Post by Jaysplace101 »

Jaysplace101
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Colorado

Post by Jaysplace101 »

Here's a good summary from Kris (mastermix) - from the quad g5 thread:

[quote][/quote]
Announcement:

MacBook Pro 4-5x faster (15.4" LCD thinner laptop)
and iMac 2-3x faster ("best desktop") with dual cores
announced MWSF....it is official....

5.6lbs. iSight, Front Row; $1999 1.67 Core Duo; 667 DDR bus, x1600; $2499 1.83GHz.

Kris..
User avatar
boonier
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: UK

Post by boonier »

Jaysplace101 wrote:Here's a good summary from Kris (mastermix) - from the quad g5 thread:
Announcement:

MacBook Pro 4-5x faster (15.4" LCD thinner laptop)
and iMac 2-3x faster ("best desktop") with dual cores
announced MWSF....it is official....

5.6lbs. iSight, Front Row; $1999 1.67 Core Duo; 667 DDR bus, x1600; $2499 1.83GHz.

Kris..
they really got us by the short and curlies dont they?...all of a sudden I feel inadequate :cry:
1ghz 17" Powerbook (currently), 1gig ram, Tiger 10.4.8, DP 4.6.1, Motu 828, Edirol FA-101, Bidule, Reason, SuperCollider, synths, hardware FX, cables, plugs, plug adaptors, extension leads, dust, vacuum cleaner
kdownes
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

now what?

Post by kdownes »

This is all exciting news - I'm particularly pleased to see them release a dual-core iMac, which I may choose for myself. I've been using a G4 733 and it's been understandably frustrating and slow, especially with MachFive and even a couple of reverb plug-ins going. None of my projects are complex enough to justify the expense of a quad desktop, so the new iMac may be just the ticket.

But. . .

What's the story with DP4.6? Is MOTU planning to release a native version shortly? I see that Apple has this "Rosetta" software that interfaces with the OS to provide smooth running of older Mac software on the new Intel machines, but I can't believe this doesn't result in a noticeable performance hit, especially with something as processer intensive as DP. I guess it still makes sense to upgrade sooner rather than later, but I'm curious how MOTU will address this transition. Sorry if this has already been covered elsewhere - I've been off the list for a while.
2.4 Ghz Duo Core iMac
4GB RAM
DP 5.13
Mach 5 V2
828mk1
Splinter
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by Splinter »

I expect MOTU will make a statement today about compatibility, unless they are terribly behind, but I don't expect that to be the case. The have been pretty good about these kinds of notices in the last few years.
Jaysplace101
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Colorado

Post by Jaysplace101 »

Splinter wrote:I expect MOTU will make a statement today about compatibility, unless they are terribly behind, but I don't expect that to be the case. The have been pretty good about these kinds of notices in the last few years.
Yeah, all except for the PCI-express notice.
qwerty
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Post by qwerty »

I hope to see some Official MOTU information on their website or here as soon as possible.
User avatar
Kazrog
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Contact:

Post by Kazrog »

I have to wonder what this means, though, for our plugins and soft synths/samplers. I get the feeling it's going to be at least a year before anyone is going to be doing mission critical professional music production on a Macintel. The new MacBooks look amazing, the sooner DP comes out the better, I would love having more speed on my mobile rig, even if there aren't many universal binary compatible plugins. Or is the AU plugin specification something that sits apart from processor specific binary code??
Shane McFee
Recabinet | Kazrog LLC
Splinter
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by Splinter »

Interesting Apple dropped the FW800 port. I assume they are expecting pros will use the Express card IO for FW800, but this is a bummer if you wanted 2 FW800 busses.
Resonant Alien
Posts: 1374
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by Resonant Alien »

Kazrog wrote:I have to wonder what this means, though, for our plugins and soft synths/samplers. I get the feeling it's going to be at least a year before anyone is going to be doing mission critical professional music production on a Macintel. The new MacBooks look amazing, the sooner DP comes out the better, I would love having more speed on my mobile rig, even if there aren't many universal binary compatible plugins. Or is the AU plugin specification something that sits apart from processor specific binary code??
Rosetta is built into OS X, so you will theoretically be able to run existing apps on Intel Macs right from the start until the developers put out universal versions - no need to wait. Of course, there have always some glitches even just bumping from one OS rev to the next - like from 10.4.1 to 10.4.2, so....
I see that Apple has this "Rosetta" software that interfaces with the OS to provide smooth running of older Mac software on the new Intel machines, but I can't believe this doesn't result in a noticeable performance hit, especially with something as processer intensive as DP
The rumor is that "old" apps running on a MacIntel under Rosetta will run slower than the Universal Intel-native version of the same apps, BUT apps under Rosetta on a MacIntel will still run faster than the same apps on a PowerPC G5.

All this is moot for me though - I have two UAD PCI cards, and UA has not made a peep about PCI Express support, so there will be no shiny new MacIntel in my future until this little fiasco is resolved!

RA
...
Jaysplace101
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Colorado

Post by Jaysplace101 »

Same here RA, this UAD thing is really a hold up. Maybe we could go in together on a magma PCI-E to PCI expansion chassis, and when we get it, I'll just saw it in half and send you one half. We'll each have 3 slots! Man am I smart!

j
User avatar
Tim
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: So Cal

Post by Tim »

Resonant Alien wrote: All this is moot for me though - I have two UAD PCI cards, and UA has not made a peep about PCI Express support, so there will be no shiny new MacIntel in my future until this little fiasco is resolved!
Last week my music store guy told me not to worry, and that the UAD thing is covered.
I'm hoping I can get some news of this at the NAMM show.....from MOTU too.
mastermix
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: New York City

Post by mastermix »

Go here if you need to prep yourself for the
ExpressCard Standard.

http://www.expresscard.org/web/site/standardsummary.jsp


Kris...
User avatar
Aramis
Posts: 1168
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Lac Beauport

Post by Aramis »

iMac 2012 27 ' 3.2 ghz 32 gigs ram OSX 10.9.4 DigitalPerformer 8.7 , MOTU Track 16, MOTU MachFive3.2, Ethno and BPM , Komplete 9, OmniSphere , Trilian and Stylus RMX , Axon mkII and Godin LG .
mastermix
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: New York City

Post by mastermix »

MOTU.COM says drivers will be ready by Jan 31st 2006!

Apple has been aggressive and MOTU and other progressive
firms following Apple's salvo.

Those that think we may "have to wait for a year" to go to the
other side may be in for a pleasant surprise.

I wonder when G5 price hacks will start on Ebay....;-)

Kris...
Post Reply