NAMM 2015: DP9
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
- spitfire31
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:11 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Sweden
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
I had the radical idea of posting a MOTU support ticket and ask about the DP9 Mac OS prerequisites.
10 minutes later (yes, MINUTES), Robin replied:
"Thanks for writing. DP9 will have the same system requirements as DP8. DP8 is currently compatible with 10.6.8 - 10.10.3."
Way to go, MOTU!
Kind regards,
Joachim
10 minutes later (yes, MINUTES), Robin replied:
"Thanks for writing. DP9 will have the same system requirements as DP8. DP8 is currently compatible with 10.6.8 - 10.10.3."
Way to go, MOTU!
Kind regards,
Joachim
If it were easy, anybody could do it.
- Tritonemusic
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
Thanks for that info, Joachim.
DP 10.13, OS 13.7.5, iMac Pro (2017) 3.2 GHz 8-Core, 32 GB RAM, MOTU M4
- Robert Randolph
- Posts: 877
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 6:50 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
I quite like mavericks, but It's impressive to hear that they are still supporting back to 10.6.8
That is really useful to a lot of people!
That is really useful to a lot of people!
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
I left Snow Leopard kicking and screaming, but I am happy to have iCloud integration with my phone. Other than that, Mavericks feels exactly the same to me.
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
How are you getting on with the gui? I found it one of the ugliest ones out there when I had it on my daw machine.amplidood wrote:I left Snow Leopard kicking and screaming, but I am happy to have iCloud integration with my phone. Other than that, Mavericks feels exactly the same to me.
- James Steele
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 22790
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
I know, right?spitfire31 wrote:I had the radical idea of posting a MOTU support ticket and ask about the DP9 Mac OS prerequisites.



JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter
Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
- monkey man
- Posts: 14074
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
Yeah, who'd have thunk it.
Glad to see MOTU's maintaining its habit of reaching as far back as it can. For me, it's a simple matter of scratchin' my butt, however in MOTU's case, it's a whole lot more complicated than that.
I mentioned this pattern of great legacy support by MOTU to someone just the other day. Don't think he believed me. His loss is the pharmacist's gain; he'll probably end up with Poo Stools now.
Glad to see MOTU's maintaining its habit of reaching as far back as it can. For me, it's a simple matter of scratchin' my butt, however in MOTU's case, it's a whole lot more complicated than that.
I mentioned this pattern of great legacy support by MOTU to someone just the other day. Don't think he believed me. His loss is the pharmacist's gain; he'll probably end up with Poo Stools now.
Mac 2012 12C Cheese Grater, OSX 10.13.6
MOTU DP8.07, MachFive 3.2.1, MIDI Express XT, 24I/O
Novation, Yamaha & Roland Synths, Guitar & Bass, Kemper Rack
Pretend I've placed your favourite quote here
- Tritonemusic
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
With the new subscription model, it'll cost him 30 bucks a month in order to be able to Poo.monkey man wrote:I mentioned this pattern of great legacy support by MOTU to someone just the other day. Don't think he believed me. His loss is the pharmacist's gain; he'll probably end up with Poo Stools now.
DP 10.13, OS 13.7.5, iMac Pro (2017) 3.2 GHz 8-Core, 32 GB RAM, MOTU M4
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
With Monkey's expert diagnostic services provided above, it will be covered under medical insurance.Tritonemusic wrote:With the new subscription model, it'll cost him 30 bucks a month in order to be able to Poo.monkey man wrote:I mentioned this pattern of great legacy support by MOTU to someone just the other day. Don't think he believed me. His loss is the pharmacist's gain; he'll probably end up with Poo Stools now.
2018 Mini i7 32G macOS 12.7.6, DP 11.33, Mixbus 10, Logic 10.7.9, Scarlett 18i8, MB Air M2, macOS 14.7.6, DP 11.33, Logic 11
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
That's only if one goes to the subscription model; they still have a so-called perpetual license model but that's $199 US per year. Anymore I'll not get into as my personal thoughts about PT as a user aren't fit for human consumption.Tritonemusic wrote:With the new subscription model, it'll cost him 30 bucks a month in order to be able to Poo.monkey man wrote:I mentioned this pattern of great legacy support by MOTU to someone just the other day. Don't think he believed me. His loss is the pharmacist's gain; he'll probably end up with Poo Stools now.
- Tritonemusic
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
Yeah, I figured most people here already knew that. I was just trying to make a lighthearted joke. Looks like it was a flop.musicman691 wrote:That's only if one goes to the subscription model; they still have a so-called perpetual license model but that's $199 US per year. Anymore I'll not get into as my personal thoughts about PT as a user aren't fit for human consumption.
DP 10.13, OS 13.7.5, iMac Pro (2017) 3.2 GHz 8-Core, 32 GB RAM, MOTU M4
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
I'm not in Yosemite. Every time I see it on someone else's computer, I absolutely despise it.musicman691 wrote:How are you getting on with the gui? I found it one of the ugliest ones out there when I had it on my daw machine.amplidood wrote:I left Snow Leopard kicking and screaming, but I am happy to have iCloud integration with my phone. Other than that, Mavericks feels exactly the same to me.
- Shooshie
- Posts: 19820
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Dallas
- Contact:
Re: NAMM 2015: DP9
I've not been happy with iOS since they went to that narrow text and flat icons thing. All the cues are gone that used to guide the eyes and make it possible to see what you need even if you don't have the right glasses on. I literally have to put on my glasses to find my address book or calendar. Used to be so easy. Once in them, I still had to put on glasses to do much, but I could always make out enough to find a phone number and click on it. Not now.amplidood wrote:I'm not in Yosemite. Every time I see it on someone else's computer, I absolutely despise it.musicman691 wrote:How are you getting on with the gui? I found it one of the ugliest ones out there when I had it on my daw machine.amplidood wrote:I left Snow Leopard kicking and screaming, but I am happy to have iCloud integration with my phone. Other than that, Mavericks feels exactly the same to me.
And those flat icons. Sometimes design guys care more about being hip to latest design trends than about being functional for users. I was very happy with the look and feel of OS X from its birth up to about 10.6 or 10.7. On the phone and iPad, iOS was nice until the version that flattened the icons.
I have apps that display time in fairly large fonts on the mobile devices. The text is so thin I can't make it out without glasses. Used to be easy to see the time and date without any more than a glance. The iPhone wakes me up every day; I look at it and cannot make out anything on the screen until I put on glasses. That sucks! I used to see every number clearly. Eyes haven't changed; I still use the same strength reading glasses. It's the damned fonts. "Skinny" isn't always good in a font! Especially a display font!
Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|