strange results in Scale time

jbyerly1 · Post by **jbyerly1** » Sat May 04, 2013 10:48 am

I'll take any suggestions you might have. The first image shows show the entered info.

The second shows the results. This should have shorten by 00.04.00

jbyerly1 · Post by **jbyerly1** » Tue May 07, 2013 8:50 pm

Looks like I have found a error in the programing. Was able to get the hour+ wav file to tech support and they came up with same results.

reply: " have reproduced your issue and at this point, have not found a fix. It looks as if this needs to be brought to our development team for further investigation. I will keep you posted on any news, but I would not expect an immediate solution."

What a way to make a person insane thinking it was something I was doing wrong

b.g. · Post by **b.g.** » Wed May 08, 2013 5:48 am

Good job on documenting and getting that to tech support's attention. You've done us all a service.

Shooshie · Post by **Shooshie** » Wed May 08, 2013 6:26 am

jbyerly1 wrote:

I'll take any suggestions you might have. The first image shows show the entered info.

The second shows the results. This should have shorten by 00.04.00

Ayiyiyiyi! That's bad news. I hope they fix it soon. I need that.

Shoosh

bralston · Post by **bralston** » Wed May 08, 2013 11:39 am

I wonder if this adding of time is also related to the same reason (similar code) when I bounce a selection of measures to disk with a QT video as the output...it also adds time to the end of the file with blank/black frames at the end. (Yes...I reported it). Hmmmmmm........

jbyerly1 · Post by **jbyerly1** » Wed May 08, 2013 6:35 pm

I tried a full project freeze (all audio files) which makes every file the exact same length unless I am misunderstanding something.
But the point is I tried a full project scale time with these frozen tracks and the results were all over the place as far as length after processing

labman · Post by **labman** » Thu May 09, 2013 6:17 am

Oh boy. We need that big time.

Help us obewon magic D

David Polich · Post by **David Polich** » Fri May 10, 2013 10:58 am

Yeah, that's a bad bug.

Meanwhile, Melodyne can be your friend in situations like this. That's
what I use to time-scale audio anyway.

MIDI Life Crisis · Post by **MIDI Life Crisis** » Fri May 10, 2013 11:01 am

... Or IRCAM in MachFive.

aweaselkid · Post by **aweaselkid** » Mon May 13, 2013 7:40 pm

MIDI Life Crisis wrote:... Or IRCAM in MachFive.

Interesting. Explain?

jbyerly1 · Post by **jbyerly1** » Mon May 13, 2013 7:45 pm

Is the Melodyne quality, the results, worth $400.00. It looks like maybe the editor could do what I need

David Polich · Post by **David Polich** » Wed May 15, 2013 6:08 pm

jbyerly1 wrote:Is the Melodyne quality, the results, worth $400.00. It looks like maybe the editor could do what I need

IMO, Melodyne is indeed worth every penny, and then some. I'd pay $499 for it.
For me it is not an option, it is a necessity. There are numerous projects
I have done which could not have been realized without Melodyne.

jbyerly1 · Post by **jbyerly1** » Thu May 16, 2013 5:56 am

Thank you for the the opinion. This is the only place I would actually listen to an opinion about software

labman · Post by **labman** » Thu May 16, 2013 6:17 am

I agree with David about the value of melodyne.

MOTUnation.com

strange results in Scale time

strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time

Re: strange results in Scale time