Small M5 functionality issue

Discussion of all things related to MOTU's awesome MachFive software sampler.

Moderator: James Steele

Post Reply
User avatar
Kurt Cowling
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Small M5 functionality issue

Post by Kurt Cowling »

I've encountered a small issue with MachFive having to do with output assignment. Thought I would pass it along. I'm using M5 in DP.

In order to freeze a MachFive part into a mono track you have to temporarily change it's output assignment to a mono bundle. This works fine, as long as you change it back! If you save and close the file with MachFive's output still set to a mono bundle you will get an effect error when reopening the project (as there is not really a mono version of MachFive). If you change the output to a stereo bundle you can re-instantiate MachFive, but you will have to reload all your presets into their respective parts. (Unless you had the foresight to save a performance, which I didn't!)

--Kurt Cowling

p.s. I've tried other methods of freezing to a mono track and this is the only one which works reliably.
DP 11.34 , 2021 MacBook Pro M1-Max, 2017 iMac Retina 5K 27-inch, Omnisphere, Trilian, Stylus RMX, EZ Drummer 2, Falcon, Real Guitar, Sample Modeling brass. Audio Modeling reeds, strings, Kontakt 6, Flux Pure Limiter 3, PSP Vintage Warmer, PSP MixPack, PSP StereoPack, PSP Impressor, Altiverb 7, Izotope RX10 Standard, Yamaha S-90ES, Yamaha MOXF-8, Yamaha MX60, Sibelius subscription, Adobe CC and Motion 5.
Kubi

Re: Small M5 functionality issue

Post by Kubi »

Thanks for the heads-up!

If you want to just record (vs. freeze), you can set M5s outs to a stereo bundle (i.e 1-2), hard-pan the mono preset, create a mono audio track with that side of the stereo bundle as the input (i.e. 1) and hit record.

I never use Freeze anyway (no monitoring, and no time saved, since it's a real-time process) so this has always worked very well. One benefit is that you can leave all settings on M5 and the Audio track untouched, should you want to re-print the track in question later.

<small>[ July 13, 2005, 02:31 PM: Message edited by: Kubi ]</small>
Post Reply