Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Discussion of Digital Performer use, optimization, tips and techniques on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
Post Reply
User avatar
SixStringGeek
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 8:28 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: La Paz, Mexico

Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by SixStringGeek »

A good friend of mine sent me a wma format rough mix of a track she has been working on with some other folks. I guess they're using pro tools on the PC.

I converted the thing to WAV using EasyWMA (which cost $10 and I highly recommend if you have to deal with audio file format conversions - also converts to mp3.

I was inspired to add some guitar parts to the song so I dragged it into a DP audio track and then started tracking other audio parts over it. I then bounced my tracks to wav files and sent them to their engineer. Yay DP! That was EASY and FUN!

However, the engineer I sent them to expressed reservations about possible timing issues since I was working off of a rough mixed WMA file rather than an unencoded WAV.

Which raises my question - what is the timing fidelity of compressed formats like mp3 and WMA vs uncompressed formats like WAV? Should they match exactly or might we encounter drift?
DP 11.newest on MacBook Air M2 24/2T
Korg Kronos Klassic Keyboard 88, Line 6 Helix
Thousands of $'s worth of vintage gear currently valued in the dozens of dollars.
User avatar
zaratero
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:50 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Gasteiz

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by zaratero »

I haven´t encountered problems with MP3 yet, exporting from DP or Audiofinder when I send demos and similar.
This is a very interesting issue though. I´d would like to know too.
http://www.cueaudio.org
Macpro 3.1 Octocore-16Gb RAM-OSX10.8 - DP 7.24
Macbook pro Core2Duo-4Gb RAM-OSX10.6 - DP 7.24
Billster
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:42 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by Billster »

I have experienced timing issues with mp3 tracking demos.

For instance, say somebody sends me a basic demo in mp3 and I work up parts for it. I match the tempo in DP to the click countoff on the mp3, and by the middle of the tune, the timing has drifted. mp3 is NOT sample accurate.
User avatar
SixStringGeek
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 8:28 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: La Paz, Mexico

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by SixStringGeek »

Billster wrote:I have experienced timing issues with mp3 tracking demos.

For instance, say somebody sends me a basic demo in mp3 and I work up parts for it. I match the tempo in DP to the click countoff on the mp3, and by the middle of the tune, the timing has drifted. mp3 is NOT sample accurate.
Good to know. I think WMA is a variable bit encoded format sponsored by Microsoft. So - given that it is variable bit rate, and especially given that it comes from Microsoft - a bunch of idiot savants - I'll bet I have similar issues. I'll post a followup when I hear back from the mix guy.

At least my parts are all mostly riffage - he can nudge them around pretty easily I think.
DP 11.newest on MacBook Air M2 24/2T
Korg Kronos Klassic Keyboard 88, Line 6 Helix
Thousands of $'s worth of vintage gear currently valued in the dozens of dollars.
newrigel

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by newrigel »

Billster wrote:I have experienced timing issues with mp3 tracking demos.

For instance, say somebody sends me a basic demo in mp3 and I work up parts for it. I match the tempo in DP to the click countoff on the mp3, and by the middle of the tune, the timing has drifted. mp3 is NOT sample accurate.
Depends if they use Constant Bit Rate (CBR) or Variable Bit Rate (VBR).
If I put anything in mpcrap I usually go 320 kbps and use CBR @ 44.1. That way it doesn't vary the sample bit rate to what it thinks it should be @. If it hears a low frequency it samples @ a lower bit rate to save memory because why sample @ a higher frequency if the nyquist theory says you have to double the sample frequency to the fundamental frequency in order to sample the complete cycle of the waveform. That's why I don't use VBR.
But I wouldn't even accept a WMA file... especially if they are in PT's he he...
And they should make sure that they send you out any compressed format @ the same sample rate of your projects... DP will do the math, but the less it has to do the better.
User avatar
SixStringGeek
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 8:28 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: La Paz, Mexico

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by SixStringGeek »

newrigel wrote:I wouldn't even accept a WMA file... especially if they are in PT's he he...
And they should make sure that they send you out any compressed format @ the same sample rate of your projects... DP will do the math, but the less it has to do the better.
Oh well, my friend was "just showing" me her new track so she sent the WMA she got from her engineer. I doubt she even knows how it was produced. It was a middle eastern sounding rock tune and I just got one of those Jerry Jones sitars and I thought "this would be great on that tune" so I added parts and sent it back and they decided to use it.

Its not like there was a plan with forethought. :-)

Next time I'll ask them to produce me a WAV, but most WAV's don't fit through an email gateway (it came out to about 80M and 20M is the limit).
DP 11.newest on MacBook Air M2 24/2T
Korg Kronos Klassic Keyboard 88, Line 6 Helix
Thousands of $'s worth of vintage gear currently valued in the dozens of dollars.
User avatar
dinobass
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: LA

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by dinobass »

When I do sessions over the internet I always request uncompressed file formats; I noticed early on (by zooming in on the file) that mp3s are always offset enough to screw with timing.
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128G RAM OSX 14.3, 16" MacBook Pro M1 Max, UA Apollo x6, UA Apollo Twin, UAD-2 Satellite (x2)
newrigel

Re: Timewise fidelity of WMA or mp3 vs WAV?

Post by newrigel »

SixStringGeek wrote:
newrigel wrote:I wouldn't even accept a WMA file... especially if they are in PT's he he...
And they should make sure that they send you out any compressed format @ the same sample rate of your projects... DP will do the math, but the less it has to do the better.
Oh well, my friend was "just showing" me her new track so she sent the WMA she got from her engineer. I doubt she even knows how it was produced. It was a middle eastern sounding rock tune and I just got one of those Jerry Jones sitars and I thought "this would be great on that tune" so I added parts and sent it back and they decided to use it.

Its not like there was a plan with forethought. :-)

Next time I'll ask them to produce me a WAV, but most WAV's don't fit through an email gateway (it came out to about 80M and 20M is the limit).
You send it has a free thing.
Post Reply