It is a prolific composer who can write a piece 217 years after his death!

Seriously, I cannot wait to see this.
Moderators: Frodo, FMiguelez, MIDI Life Crisis
I saw this on the news and went on line to see it, I wish there was a good photo of the music so I could hear it in my head.mhschmieder wrote:Interesting. That article didn't pop up when I visited MSNBC this morning, but the BBC article did, and this is a rare case where the BBC article was less detailed.
I'm always excited when these discoveries are made, because not only are we likely to hear another great work from one of the masters, but the unfinished nature of it opens opportunities for composers to apply their training towards attempting to infer how it would have been finished -- with alternate views.
A case in point is Mahler's 10th Symphony, which now has at least two, if not three, interpretations of how Mahler might have completed it, based on his scant notes.
I think I may have found on attempt at completing it...bkshepard wrote:From what I read in the news, it's a sketch of a melody with no harmony nor suggested instrumentation. It was probably a theme he was working on for use some other work. Too bad it never got completed.
WRONG! It should be a Eb triple sharp! (Once removed...)bkshepard wrote:There's a wrong note in that. First 16th note after J, top pitch should be F-natural. Damn, I hate proof-reading!
On the recording I've got, I'm pretty sure it's an F-natural enharmonically spelled as Eb double-sharp.MIDI Life Crisis wrote:WRONG! It should be a Eb triple sharp! (Once removed...)bkshepard wrote:There's a wrong note in that. First 16th note after J, top pitch should be F-natural. Damn, I hate proof-reading!
Lucky for us DP users that we have QuickScribe to handle these sorts of scores.MIDI Life Crisis wrote:BTW, here is the second movement: