So, as the first legit teaser here's a sneak peek at a banner that says "Mac OSX Leopard: Introducing Vista 2.0". Should be a lively week of musings.

Moderator: James Steele
LOL!! It's all an effort to keep myself entertained!monkey man wrote:Nice 'photo, Frod's.![]()
Mean resolution.
Now, if we magnify grid-sector H-9...
I'd be tempted to say you were a classic if I wasn't such a sad case myself!
Even though, in my case at least, I won't be purchasing the machine 'till the money's saved.Frodo wrote:But, here we are-- the news is already breaking and the info-hungry Appleheads (like myself) are already drooling cautiously over what this all means for DAW users.
LOL!! Useless indeed. Now you know why Hobbits are more likely to stay on the outer fringes of technology. I, too, am holding off despite all the encouraging news.monkey man wrote:Oh, yeah, and the more time you get to download Frodo's useless tidbits using your 2k modem connection!
You know I didn't mean it, mate.Frodo wrote:LOL!! Useless indeed.monkey man wrote:Oh, yeah, and the more time you get to download Frodo's useless tidbits using your 2k modem connection!
It is encouraging, isn't it?Frodo wrote: I, too, am holding off despite all the encouraging news.
Of course; thank you.Frodo wrote:More time also allows for more unforeseen bugs to be sorted out, making the investment a tad more worth the wait.
Great news.Frodo wrote:I am happy to see that there are more bays for internal drives. I've found SATA more reliable than FW overall. For that reason alone, I'm starting to save my Shire pennies.
Of course not-- but you aren't too far from the truth!!monkey man wrote: You know I didn't mean it, mate.![]()
Yeah-- many have reported occasional FW dropouts, not only with HD's but with interfaces of all sorts. I finally noticed that most of those reporting various dysfunctions up the the DP forum had a lot more FW connected than I do *in general*. They are really pushing their busses, and from some reports, it is possible to fry the FW busses if overworked to an extreme. Sad thing is, I'm not in a position to confirm this once and for all for them, so some things remain under heavy spec and suspicion. I'm still testing the common sense of my own system, but by the time I can post anything definitive on the subject, PPCs will be in the British Museum.monkey man wrote:Great news.
I knew if I could hold off on a firewire option long enough, something would come up!
Apart from the experience I had with the IBM DeskStar (DeathStar) range some years ago, the SATA experience has been bliss.
Especially so, I think, because I've never bought a defragger!
The SATAs have somehow got me through glitch-free! Touch wood.
I know. Scary.Frodo wrote:Of course not-- but you aren't too far from the truth!!monkey man wrote: You know I didn't mean it, mate.![]()
Yup. I concur.Frodo wrote:monkey man wrote:Great news.
I knew if I could hold off on a firewire option long enough, something would come up!
Apart from the experience I had with the IBM DeskStar (DeathStar) range some years ago, the SATA experience has been bliss.
Especially so, I think, because I've never bought a defragger!
The SATAs have somehow got me through glitch-free! Touch wood.Frodo wrote:Yeah-- many have reported occasional FW dropouts, not only with HD's but with interfaces of all sorts. I finally noticed that most of those reporting various dysfunctions up the the DP forum had a lot more FW connected than I do *in general*. They are really pushing their busses, and from some reports, it is possible to fry the FW busses if overworked to an extreme.
Reverend Jobs.Frodo wrote:I really thought that after Reverend Jobs' sermon on Monday that suddenly the entire world and they that dwell therein
Good call.Frodo wrote:Ah, MM. How nice it is to enjoy the calm AFTER the storm! I really thought that after Reverend Jobs' sermon on Monday that suddenly the entire world and they that dwell therein would completely be so "last week", but I awoke the next day to discover that my system was no worse off after the big announcements than it was the day before.
A Frodo original. Wonderful.Frodo wrote:Happy is he who has what he likes, but happier is he who likes what he has.
~ a new hobbit proverb
Of course. Isn't that always the case?James Steele wrote:I sat up and watched Steve's presentation via QuickTime. (and FINALLY bought QuickTime Pro... which means perhaps QuickTime 8 will be released in a week and I'll have to buy it again).
Did you see grimepoch's Logic vs DP tests this morning? Both crashed when pushed but some plugins in Logic out performed DP by an average factor of 3-4 times.James Steele wrote: Anyway, in regards to the new MacPros... when the comparisons were being shown in regard to real world applications and performance gains once figure I saw up on the chart but they glanced over was Final Cut Pro performance gain. It was 1.4x faster. Of course the comparison was a G5 Quad wasn't it, so maybe it's not all that bad. But the people I know who are using a G5 Quad in video production aren't going to go out and buy this machine for a 40% speed gain as far as I know.
Of course Apple listed Logic on that chart as well. I'd be curious to see what DP will do on it and can't wait till someone posts about this here. I think Gary (Timeline) is buying one of the new machines so maybe he'll have a report for us in a week or two.
Well now, that IS something to get excited about. But I do agree that real world tests will tell the story more accurately. No doubt, U-nation will be THE place to be over the next year for such reports on DP performance.James Steele wrote: Oh yeah, 4 drive bays is a good thing.
My Melbourne Friend:monkey man wrote:A Frodo original. Wonderful.Frodo wrote:Happy is he who has what he likes, but happier is he who likes what he has.
~ a new hobbit proverb
That one's close to my heart.
If you don't mind, I'd like to keep that one in my collection, Frodo.
Of course, it's for personal use only and therefore respects the Shire's Copyright law.
I guess because it was supposed to have been crossed on the PPC architecture. In a way it's pretty sad that IBM just didn't care. It seemed PowerPC held lots of promise and was exciting, but it seems like it's an official dead end in microcomputers.Frodo wrote:Come to think of it, how long have we waited for Mac to reach the 3 G mark? It was promised on the G5 PPC platform by summer of 2005, but so little fanfare has been made about this new clock threshold having been crossed.