Page 4 of 11

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:55 am
by riproryn
blue wrote:Does that mean...yada...yada...ya?
Nope.

rn

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:27 am
by sdfalk
riproryn wrote:
blue wrote:Does that mean...yada...yada...ya?
Nope.

rn
If you don't have thing constructive to offer then maybe that's for the best.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:19 am
by giles117
Please optimize MAS......PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!

Was much bett under 3.11

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:23 am
by Bowman
Interesting posts. I thought the spikes were just me and my antiquated gear (iMac G4).

MOTU should fix the problems rather than creeping the features.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:19 am
by Studio615
Chalk up another plea for optimizing MAS.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:09 am
by builder
I too agree and would like to suscribe to your newsletter......... The one that talks about all the optimization in MAS.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:28 am
by wylie
its hard to believe that it wouldn't be an on going process for a software co. to continuously be working on optimization.
MOTU hows your optimization dept. coming along?

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:06 am
by jandron
Count me in, as well. Make DP more efficient!!!

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:37 am
by Fibes
Optimize a pro tools Killer.

I'm counting on some more of that ol' Masshole ingenuity.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:52 am
by Jaysplace101
Not to sidetrack the thread, but it might also be beneficial for us to acknowledge that we will pay for this update. Some have already done this, and I'd like to add myself to that. I would pay good money for an optimization. I know, many will say it should be included, and yeah, it should, but I'm not going to argue about it, I would LOVE to pay for an optimized update.

j

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:12 am
by Jim
I'm going to try reverse psychiatry (thanks, Archie Bunker)here:

I don't think MOTU CAN optimize DP. I don't think they're smart enough.

OSX is in version 4, and has been out for three or more years, and I think that if MOTU had the intelligence to optimize DP, they would have done it by now. So apparently, they're just not up to it. Maybe they should slip into Cupertino or into Germany, and try to recruit some of the Logic software engineers to do it for them, as they obviously don't have the collective brainpower to pull it off. Nyah, nyah, nyah!

How am I doing, Chief?

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:57 am
by riproryn
Jim wrote:I'm going to try reverse psychiatry (thanks, Archie Bunker)here:

I don't think MOTU CAN optimize DP. I don't think they're smart enough.

OSX is in version 4, and has been out for three or more years, and I think that if MOTU had the intelligence to optimize DP, they would have done it by now. So apparently, they're just not up to it. Maybe they should slip into Cupertino or into Germany, and try to recruit some of the Logic software engineers to do it for them, as they obviously don't have the collective brainpower to pull it off. Nyah, nyah, nyah!

How am I doing, Chief?
Well. I'm not your chief but your doing just fine. My thoughts exactly.

rn

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:28 am
by jon
Yes 4 Optimizing MAS.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:01 pm
by shuld
Im in too!
Can we get a responce from MOTU?

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:05 pm
by Kubi
Maybe someone should fix the spelling in the thread title? Makes this whole thing look more, shall we say, uh, professional?

:roll:

I'm always in favor of faster, more powerful, more reliable, and better sounding. In regards to almost everything, pretty much.

:D :D :D :D :D