19" wide screen
Moderator: James Steele
- daniel.sneed
- Posts: 2267
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: France
- Contact:
19" wide screen
Any one tried once using a wide 19" screen ?
I am thinking to take the plunge. I think it fits better my way of staring long times to DP sequence editor.
Any known issue ?
Thankx for advices
dAn
I am thinking to take the plunge. I think it fits better my way of staring long times to DP sequence editor.
Any known issue ?
Thankx for advices
dAn
dAn Shakin' all over!
DP11.34, OS12.7.6, MacBookPro-i7
Falcon, Kontakt, Ozone, RX, Unisum, Michelangelo, Sparkverb
Waldorf Iridium & STVC & Blofeld, Kemper Profiler Stage, EWIusb, Mixface
JBL4326+4312sub, Behringer X32rack
Many mandolins, banjos, guitars, flutes, melodions, xylos, kalimbas...

DP11.34, OS12.7.6, MacBookPro-i7
Falcon, Kontakt, Ozone, RX, Unisum, Michelangelo, Sparkverb
Waldorf Iridium & STVC & Blofeld, Kemper Profiler Stage, EWIusb, Mixface
JBL4326+4312sub, Behringer X32rack
Many mandolins, banjos, guitars, flutes, melodions, xylos, kalimbas...
- Spikey Horse
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:50 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
- daniel.sneed
- Posts: 2267
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: France
- Contact:
strange afirmation
My old powerbook Titanium came with a wide screen.
That's the reason why I'd like to stick to this type of view.
If you can find any further information, it would be of much interest.

My old powerbook Titanium came with a wide screen.
That's the reason why I'd like to stick to this type of view.
If you can find any further information, it would be of much interest.
dAn Shakin' all over!
DP11.34, OS12.7.6, MacBookPro-i7
Falcon, Kontakt, Ozone, RX, Unisum, Michelangelo, Sparkverb
Waldorf Iridium & STVC & Blofeld, Kemper Profiler Stage, EWIusb, Mixface
JBL4326+4312sub, Behringer X32rack
Many mandolins, banjos, guitars, flutes, melodions, xylos, kalimbas...

DP11.34, OS12.7.6, MacBookPro-i7
Falcon, Kontakt, Ozone, RX, Unisum, Michelangelo, Sparkverb
Waldorf Iridium & STVC & Blofeld, Kemper Profiler Stage, EWIusb, Mixface
JBL4326+4312sub, Behringer X32rack
Many mandolins, banjos, guitars, flutes, melodions, xylos, kalimbas...
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:23 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia
- Contact:
4:3 vs. 16:9
Just keep this in mind:
Screen with same diagonal (for example 19'') has more area when sides are equal. The biggest 19'' screen would be square. The more difference you get between longer and shorter side the less screen area you get.
This all comes down to basic geometry and math.
The bottom line:
----------------------------------------------
19'' widescreen (16:9 ratio for example) is actually smaller than
19'' normal screen (4:3 ratio)
Screen with same diagonal (for example 19'') has more area when sides are equal. The biggest 19'' screen would be square. The more difference you get between longer and shorter side the less screen area you get.
This all comes down to basic geometry and math.
The bottom line:
----------------------------------------------
19'' widescreen (16:9 ratio for example) is actually smaller than
19'' normal screen (4:3 ratio)
+372 56222285
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:28 am
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
Re: 4:3 vs. 16:9
thats true, but wouldnt you be able to see more tracks in the mixing board with the larger horizontal dimensions even though the total area is less? the mixing board is typically a rectangle not a square, right?papageno wrote:Just keep this in mind:
Screen with same diagonal (for example 19'') has more area when sides are equal. The biggest 19'' screen would be square. The more difference you get between longer and shorter side the less screen area you get.
This all comes down to basic geometry and math.
The bottom line:
----------------------------------------------
19'' widescreen (16:9 ratio for example) is actually smaller than
19'' normal screen (4:3 ratio)
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:23 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Tallinn, Estonia
- Contact:
Re: 4:3 vs. 16:9
Of course it all comes down to what you need.lane_hagood wrote:wouldnt you be able to see more tracks in the mixing board with the larger horizontal dimensions even though the total area is less?
If your mostly need to see a mixing board which fits better on more narrow screen then widescreen is perfect for you.
I am working with scores and I need to see both, horizontal and vertical.
+372 56222285
- twistedtom
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Between Portland and Mt. Hood Oregon.
- mhschmieder
- Posts: 11416
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Annandale VA
What is the current measuring criteria, and is it consistent? The reason I ask is that I was briefly in the computer monitor business in the early 80's, and I remember it being very precise and consistent as the diagonal of visible screen area.
Yet these days when I go into a store and see the specs, my own measurements don't even come close. Sometimes they match the full enclosure diagonal, which on an iMac G5 may be twice as big as the actual visible screen area. Sometimes it seems to match the width instead.
What gives? Are these numbers "real" anymore?
Yet these days when I go into a store and see the specs, my own measurements don't even come close. Sometimes they match the full enclosure diagonal, which on an iMac G5 may be twice as big as the actual visible screen area. Sometimes it seems to match the width instead.
What gives? Are these numbers "real" anymore?