Ultralite taken apart (to fix that lousy display)

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
Discussion related to installation, configuration and use of MOTU hardware such as MIDI interfaces, audio interfaces, etc. for Mac OSX
Post Reply
Sticky Fox
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:38 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Ultralite taken apart (to fix that lousy display)

Post by Sticky Fox »

Jidis wrote:Take Care (and please, don't anybody rip up a warrantied unit without some good research)

PS Sticky Fox- If you do end up inside one of the MOTU's, it would be cool to know what model or chipset the screen actually was. The mounting hole placement and the total size might be helpful to someone too.
If anyone wants to see the inside without voiding his/her warranty, I volunteer mine:

http://www.bobdbob.com/~deneb/ftp/ultralite/

Check out the Xilinx FPGA and the S&S brand. It doesn't say anything about unicorns on the inside. :)

Also interesting is the AKM 4620A 192-kHz audio codec chips and JRC 4580 opamps. The only other significant IC in there is the TI firewire interface. Pretty clean design huh?

I have no idea if the AKM DACs are good quality chips. I know everybody uses those JRC amps, and I've read about people swapping these out for better ones, but it's not a task for the faint-hearted, especially with the lack of free space in here. Mine sounds just fine, thanks.

Jidis: The LCD is a 44780, and it looks pretty awful at first, but if you look closely (and this may not be evident from the photo), you can see that only two screws are holding it in. It's LED-backlit (and changing the color is not out of the question either). Lumex makes a couple models that will drop right in. You may even be able to use a VFD, but I would be careful about putting an inverter-powered display in an audio component. (I haven't heard any buzzing coming from my casio pictured in the other thread though.)

Another kind of cool thing is that the card with the track numbers and page/sample rate legends is just a piece of paper sitting in there. You could replace it with anything you like.

By the way: If you do take yours apart, be careful about how you put the case back on. If you get it backwards, the vent holes will line up with each other, air won't flow over the board, and it could overheat. And I imagine MOTU won't warranty this kind of failure. You should have a vent hole on each side of the unit looking from the front.
User avatar
Jidis
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Virginia

Post by Jidis »

Sticky Fox,

Great post! :D

FWIW- I actually have a 424, and have gotten sort of disgusted by some of MOTU's policies and priorities, by hanging around here too much, so I doubt I'd go with anything else of theirs, unless it was a really cheap eBay deal or something, and I was confident that I could get it to work, despite their Windows support. :cry:

I got too excited about seeing the Ultralite guts and hadn't even made it to that paragraph about the screen yet. :wink:

Yeah, without seeing behind the ribbon, it looks like one of those things with the 14 pin header and the two BL pins located away from it, but also like the mainboard has the regular 16 pin header (with the two power pins at the end). Where do they go when they hit that first board? Also, is that LCD board squashed into a female header or something on the long vertical board (should be easy as pie)? The inverters, AFAIK, will take the 5v lines and bump them way up externally, before they hit the LCD inputs, so if it passes through any of that junk on the long board, it may have to be run directly to the LCD or something (unless you're sure it's just regular LED lighting). Does sound pretty easy to replace, but the power for the lighting still seems sort of scary, if people are saying it's "dim" and there aren't any contrast adjustments. May be worth trying to figure out what the output lines to the LED inputs are actually doing on the LCD side of the board, as well as the contrast/luminance pins, but I guess you'd get the same output to whatever you swapped in, so it probably couldn't hurt itself. Problem is, it may make a cool looking replacement come out dim just like the original. May be worth connecting a cheap one to see if the lighting's the same, before ordering anything. The low light may be a power precaution, since the UL can run entirely off the host's power.

Here's a handful of regular 44780 compatibles:

Image

The two 40x2's have the 14 pin headers, and the BL lines separate. The one at the bottom left is the same pinning, with a straight row soldered on (you could probably even solder a 16 pin ribbon to those if you had to.

BTW- Something common here uses that 16 pin ribbon. I think it may be the old Mac floppies (beige stuff). 20 pins may even work, if there's space to hang the empty side over on the board (I think PC floppies use the 20).

That screen at the top has the two light connections above the 14 pin holes. It doesn't have a header, but I've soldered them on easily. Those are just "reflective" versions, where the light connections on them don't actually go anywhere, and I've got a pile of those here. I was interested in your previous mention of light replacement because of them. I've been looking at EL foil and side view LED lighting for them.

That UL mainboard looks like "surface mount city". :wink: I don't see many people messing with op-amps which aren't "thru hole", but some do. That's the same way the Behringer ADA8000 is done, but it's small, modular boards per-channel. People also warn that even though the pinning and requirements may be similar, the circuits are often optimized for whatever was used, so swapping may not get the full benefit of some replacement chips, without proper tweaking. May be worth waiting for one of the "analog veterans" to experiment on one and put up his/her results.

I think S&S Research is actually a MOTU brand or something. It goes way back into the old MIDI interfaces too. I've often wondered if the chips were anything common and/or just custom programmed for them, but it didn't seem like there was any "public" info on it.

Thanks again for the pics. If I open my 424, I'll be sure to return the favor here. It may soon be moved to a rack location with better airflow, so I'd likely do it then.

Take Care,

George

PS- People might want to know the hole spacing on that screen too. Those 16x2's in my picture aren't even the same, but they're close. A rough check with a caliper here gets: 1.2"(30.6mm) by 2.9"(75mm) for the left one, and 1.15"(29.45mm) by 3.17"(80.5mm) for the one on the right. There usually aren't traces or anything near the corners, so if there's a standard size available, I guess you can carve a little out of the holes on the new LCD, or add a small washer. The protruding "screen" part looks the same on these (1"x2.87" for the outside/.63"x2.5" for the window).
Sticky Fox
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:38 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by Sticky Fox »

Oh yeah, I measured the hole spacing, but forgot to mention it. They're about 81mm apart, and the other two holes are unused. I guess 80.5 or whatever the bottom right one in your photo is.

As you observed, the connector on the mainboard is 16 pins, and the cable is split so 14 go to the data connector, and the other two are plugged into the backlight. At first glance I thought it looked like an EL strip, but there is in fact an LED clearly visible in the backlight. It's actually a pretty strange looking backlight, but since the LED is exposed, you could easily switch it out for another color. And that there's only one of them may have something to do with the brightness too.

The front panel board actually has a large rectangular hole cut in it, and in the second and third photo you're looking through that hole at the LCD board, which is mounted flush and centered over the hole. It's not obvious but you can see that the two boards are of slightly different shades of green. There's a regular two-pin header for the backlight and a 14-pin header for the data. The other ribbon cable you see is not connected to the LCD; it's connected to the front panel board, probably just for the rotary encoders.

I didn't think to plug in an LCD to test it. All of mine are unfortunately of the 14-pins-in-a-row variety, but I don't see why I couldn't just make a different header cable for them. The UltraLite is back in my rack right now. If I get bored one of these days and decide to commit to the swap, I will definitely post results and photos.
baanes
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:45 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by baanes »

Nice job taking the thing apart. Some research shows that the AKM4620A is the best-specced single chip codec AKM makes, however some of their discrete DACs and ADCs are supposedly better. I'm guessing that the traveler and 828 use different converters from the ultralite, based on this, but it would be interesting if anyone knew which were used in these other units.
arth
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:29 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Simsbury, CT, USA

Post by arth »

I hate to tell you this, but chances are relatively high that S&S Research are indeed the real designers of the MOTU products (or the company that handles outsourcing the design to the real designers). Most American electronics companies don't do their own products from scratch, but contact an Asian company to collect and present design prototypes, which they pick and choose from, ask for modifications to, get a final design back, and then get produced (in the Far East) with their own logo.
MOTU might have their own electronics design team, but I highly doubt it. Very few companies do, and usually not those you'd think.

Regards,
--
*Art
User avatar
Jidis
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Virginia

Post by Jidis »

Arth,

Definitely! :wink:

I was looking them up a while ago out of curiosity, when I went in the MicroExpress. There were web pages and stuff about the "business" end of S&S. Seems to have been MOTU's name for many years, and the location was the same.

Catch is, there are other IC's and stuff, where they are "rebranded" regular chips, and sometimes even things with the labels eaten off or changed, but I'm guessing these may be a standard processor with their program code and pinning blown into them (but no, they wouldn't have actually "made" any of them).

* just a guess :lol:

Take Care,

George
arth
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:29 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Simsbury, CT, USA

Post by arth »

Yep, from what I can see, it appears that S&S Research is the design/electronics back-end for MOTU, which is the sales and marketing company. It makes sense to have it split, in many ways -- both for safety, and because S&S Research can do work for other companies too.

Regards,
--
*Art
Post Reply