PCI 324 drivers for windows xp

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
Discussion related to installation, configuration and use of MOTU hardware such as MIDI interfaces, audio interfaces, etc. with Windows
User avatar
Jidis
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Virginia

Post by Jidis »

Thanks for the details.

I've got to get to some of my day stuff, but will try to look into this later on, if nobody else comes up with anything. There may be one or two more helpful details, but I'd have to think.

Does it screw up in all those apps you mention? They're probably not all using the same soundcard driver (or they shouldn't be). Steinberg stuff is my main thing, and I know that should ideally be set for the dedicated "MOTU PCI-324 ASIO" driver or whatever (not the generic or multimedia ASIO stuff). Also, try shutting off any of the boxes you can in that XP multimedia devices panel (map through this device,etc.). If there's an audio problem, you don't want anything trying to access the card for system use, while your program's using it. "Use audio features on this device" might completely block ASIO access to the card, but try that too after you make sure Cubase is using the right driver. There are a few other devices that may possibly smash into the 324 while it's working like that too, and you can try them 1 by 1. The network card might be one, as well as the video card (that Intel thing is an actual "card" right). Sometimes the slot you've got stuff in can be internally "hardwired" into motherboard resources that some of the other stuff needs. You can often track down documentation for your motherboard model, which may tell you which slots are shared with what, so you can put it in a more "relaxed" slot, but just swapping the card around by trial & error may get you going there. Even my PCI-424 has a slot or two that it dislikes on my machine. -- I'm also guessing you've installed in regular "ACPI" mode (The first "computer" item in the device manager should tell you).

As a last resort, there are usually some BIOS parameters and XP prefs you can mess with which may help (PCI latency, bus mastering,RAM timing,AGP speed,etc.), but I wouldn't do that yet.

www.musicxp.net usually has some good DAW tuning tips. I think there's also a section, or PDF, on the RME site for general DAW config stuff too.

Assuming the 324 panel is like mine, how much of the stuff is actually on or off in there (rather than just what's used by the app or session)? Cubase, of course, has it's own buffer prefs too. If you aren't on that 324 ASIO driver in there, that could be a prime suspect.

BTW- The noise you describe sort of sounds like things you'll get when there's a digital input configured in the MOTU prefs, but the device itself is disconnected or turned off. Interfering devices and clock mismatches will often more likely create dropped samples, brief spikes, and other occasional transient noises. Is it happening at anything that sounds like consistent intervals, and can you think of anything you could try in standalone mode, which may tell you whether or not the box itself is healthy in it's other functions? (longshot)

Don't know what part it plays, but are you up to date on DirectX (9.0c?) and your Intel chipset drivers and all? You can get a chipset update bundle easily from Intel's site. Also make sure that board's BIOS is fairly up to date.

Your host CPU is obviously plenty powerful, unless that chipset or RAM is somehow on a known blacklist, but I wouldn't guess an Intel would be in there. I'll try to get you that list too, so if you're not using a proprietary case which won't fit a standard ATX board, a board swap may not cost all that much as another last resort. I can maybe put this stuff up in that Nuendo thread too if I can't help. Again, my knowledge is pretty limited to Steinberg/ASIO stuff, but there are people in there who run a variety.

I'd start with an absolute minimum: Two input/outputs or one bank enabled everywhere, system sounds off, internal 324 clock, no MTP, default buffers (I really don't think they should need to be too high for 2 channels on the dedicated ASIO driver), and the NIC disabled in the device manager. After that, maybe try knocking down the video acceleration and some of the busmastering or enhancements for that or your IDE controller. If you can, borrow another graphics card, and shut that one down in the BIOS, if it's an onboard circuit, to see what that does.
(keep track of all this junk while you're doing it)

With that CPU and the WD drive, you should get a hell of a lot of tracks going, but start with those two tracks to get that noise out of the way first.

And last but not first, the famous "try another firewire cable" suggestion. :wink:

Alright, so much for the day stuff. :evil: (no problem really :lol: )

I'll check back later. Let me know here if it gets fixed.

George
gualso wrote:SORRY ABOUT MY ENGLISH, I DO SEPK SPANISH
Maybe André Maquera can help. 8)
gualso
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:41 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Post by gualso »

DEAR GEORGE :
ALL I TRYIED IS IN CAPS

Does it screw up in all those apps you mention? YES IT DOES They're probably not all using the same soundcard driver (or they shouldn't be).

THEY SHOULD USE ASIO DRIVER.IT‘S SUPPOSED ASIO DRIVER WAS MADE FOR WORKING WHIT ALL THAT SOFT WARE.

Steinberg stuff is my main thing, and I know that should ideally be set for the dedicated "MOTU PCI-324 ASIO" driver or whatever (not the generic or multimedia ASIO stuff). Also, try shutting off any of the boxes you can in that XP multimedia devices panel (map through this device,etc.).
IT WAS TRYIED,

Sometimes the slot you've got stuff in can be internally "hardwired" into motherboard resources that some of the other stuff needs. I‘VE TRYIED CHANGIN SLOTS, IRQ, ETC.

You can often track down documentation for your motherboard model, which may tell you which slots are shared with what, so you can put it in a more "relaxed" slot,
I DID THAT

. Even my PCI-424 has a slot or two that it dislikes on my machine. -- I'm also guessing you've installed in regular "ACPI" mode (The first "computer" item in the device manager should tell you).

As a last resort, there are usually some BIOS parameters and XP prefs you can mess with which may help (PCI latency, bus mastering,RAM timing,AGP speed,etc.), but I wouldn't do that yet.
IT WAS CHANGED TO.


Assuming the 324 panel is like mine, how much of the stuff is actually on or off in there (rather than just what's used by the app or session)? Cubase, of course, has it's own buffer prefs too. If you aren't on that 324 ASIO driver in there, that could be a prime suspect.
REMEMBER IS NOT ONLY CUBASE ASIO DRIVER PROBLEM, I‘VE HAD PROBLEM WHIT EVERY ASIO DRIVER COMPATILBE AUDIO SOFT.

. Interfering devices and clock mismatches will often more likely create dropped samples, brief spikes, and other occasional transient noises. Is it happening at anything that sounds like consistent intervals, and can you think of anything you could try in standalone mode, which may tell you whether or not the box itself is healthy in it's other functions? (longshot) .
I HAVE A G4 350MHZ NO PROBLEM WHIT THIS
SO I SUPPOSE IT‘S A NEW HARD WARE COMPATIBILITY.
AM I WRONG??
I DID ALL YOU SUGESTME BUT A COULDN‘T GET THAT NOISE OUT

Don't know what part it plays, but are you up to date on DirectX (9.0c?) and your Intel chipset drivers and all? You can get a chipset update bundle easily from Intel's site. Also make sure that board's BIOS is fairly up to date.

TOMORROW I‘LL TRY THE SYSTEM INTO AN OLDER MOTHER OBARD

And last but not first, the famous "try another firewire cable" suggestion.
I TRYED THE FIREWIRE IN MY G4 AND IS‘T OK

AS YOU SEE IT WASEN‘T FIXED. ANY WAY GETTING A GOOD PCI CONFIGURATION SHOULDN‘T BE SO COMPLICATED
.I WAS A MOTU FAN BUT NOW I‘M VERY DISAPOINTED, I‘VE WASTED A LOT OF TIME....
MY QUESTION IS
IS THE PCI 324 CARD COMPATILBE WHIT THE NEW PC HARD WARE?? AT THIS MOMENT I CAN‘T BUY A PCI 424e . SO I NEED SOME ONE GIVE ME A SOLUTION

THANKS AGAIN

GUALSO




Jidis wrote:Thanks for the details.

I've got to get to some of my day stuff, but will try to look into this later on, if nobody else comes up with anything. There may be one or two more helpful details, but I'd have to think.

Does it screw up in all those apps you mention? They're probably not all using the same soundcard driver (or they shouldn't be). Steinberg stuff is my main thing, and I know that should ideally be set for the dedicated "MOTU PCI-324 ASIO" driver or whatever (not the generic or multimedia ASIO stuff). Also, try shutting off any of the boxes you can in that XP multimedia devices panel (map through this device,etc.). If there's an audio problem, you don't want anything trying to access the card for system use, while your program's using it. "Use audio features on this device" might completely block ASIO access to the card, but try that too after you make sure Cubase is using the right driver. There are a few other devices that may possibly smash into the 324 while it's working like that too, and you can try them 1 by 1. The network card might be one, as well as the video card (that Intel thing is an actual "card" right). Sometimes the slot you've got stuff in can be internally "hardwired" into motherboard resources that some of the other stuff needs. You can often track down documentation for your motherboard model, which may tell you which slots are shared with what, so you can put it in a more "relaxed" slot, but just swapping the card around by trial & error may get you going there. Even my PCI-424 has a slot or two that it dislikes on my machine. -- I'm also guessing you've installed in regular "ACPI" mode (The first "computer" item in the device manager should tell you).

As a last resort, there are usually some BIOS parameters and XP prefs you can mess with which may help (PCI latency, bus mastering,RAM timing,AGP speed,etc.), but I wouldn't do that yet.

www.musicxp.net usually has some good DAW tuning tips. I think there's also a section, or PDF, on the RME site for general DAW config stuff too.

Assuming the 324 panel is like mine, how much of the stuff is actually on or off in there (rather than just what's used by the app or session)? Cubase, of course, has it's own buffer prefs too. If you aren't on that 324 ASIO driver in there, that could be a prime suspect.

BTW- The noise you describe sort of sounds like things you'll get when there's a digital input configured in the MOTU prefs, but the device itself is disconnected or turned off. Interfering devices and clock mismatches will often more likely create dropped samples, brief spikes, and other occasional transient noises. Is it happening at anything that sounds like consistent intervals, and can you think of anything you could try in standalone mode, which may tell you whether or not the box itself is healthy in it's other functions? (longshot)

Don't know what part it plays, but are you up to date on DirectX (9.0c?) and your Intel chipset drivers and all? You can get a chipset update bundle easily from Intel's site. Also make sure that board's BIOS is fairly up to date.

Your host CPU is obviously plenty powerful, unless that chipset or RAM is somehow on a known blacklist, but I wouldn't guess an Intel would be in there. I'll try to get you that list too, so if you're not using a proprietary case which won't fit a standard ATX board, a board swap may not cost all that much as another last resort. I can maybe put this stuff up in that Nuendo thread too if I can't help. Again, my knowledge is pretty limited to Steinberg/ASIO stuff, but there are people in there who run a variety.

I'd start with an absolute minimum: Two input/outputs or one bank enabled everywhere, system sounds off, internal 324 clock, no MTP, default buffers (I really don't think they should need to be too high for 2 channels on the dedicated ASIO driver), and the NIC disabled in the device manager. After that, maybe try knocking down the video acceleration and some of the busmastering or enhancements for that or your IDE controller. If you can, borrow another graphics card, and shut that one down in the BIOS, if it's an onboard circuit, to see what that does.
(keep track of all this junk while you're doing it)

With that CPU and the WD drive, you should get a hell of a lot of tracks going, but start with those two tracks to get that noise out of the way first.

And last but not first, the famous "try another firewire cable" suggestion. :wink:

Alright, so much for the day stuff. :evil: (no problem really :lol: )

I'll check back later. Let me know here if it gets fixed.

George
gualso wrote:SORRY ABOUT MY ENGLISH, I DO SEPK SPANISH
Maybe André Maquera can help. 8)
User avatar
Jidis
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Virginia

Post by Jidis »

gualso wrote:ANY WAY GETTING A GOOD PCI CONFIGURATION SHOULDN‘T BE SO COMPLICATED. I WAS A MOTU FAN BUT NOW I‘M VERY DISAPOINTED,
I‘VE WASTED A LOT OF TIME....
Gualso,

Lots of us have, and "disappointed" barely describes it. That's why you'll find such harsh comments in the newsgroup archives and some of the web posts. If you're fortunate to have the PC stuff that a MOTU interface agrees with, or was tested on, you're good to go, but if you end up with the "wrong" hardware or software, even an experienced, Windows-savvy PC builder can easily waste several days trying to figure out what's wrong, and may still not be able to solve it. Most people want, or need it to work so badly, and have grown to expect a reasonable amount of compatibility from their PC hardware, so it takes quite a while (or quite a bit more money) for some to realize that it really was NOT their fault, and it wasn't possible to make it work under their configuration. Painful and expensive lessons to learn sometimes (thus the rampant profanities).

Sorry you haven't got it happening yet. If it is indeed doing it consistently in all, apps, and even with WDM drivers, it's looking more like incompatible hardware, or a troublesome software or OS config. The RAM could be an issue, as I seem to recall seeing it mentioned somewhere before, but some of this stuff seems so poorly tested, that a few of the "known incompatibilities" actually end up working on certain people's machines. You really shouldn't have to go back to any "old" hardware for it, there were evidently several fairly powerful ones used by some of the Nuendo guys.

Was the video a card, or an integrated onboard circuit, and could you get the network card turned off? You really ought to try to cut all that stuff off (at the roots if possible), either from the BIOS or any motherboard jumpers. BTW- Is there any onboard sound, modem or anything else? If you hit absolutely everything from that other stuff, I can maybe get some more details and run it back into that Nuendo forum, but I'd rather avoid bugging them on it again. Someone there also may have a definite answer on the RAM possibility.
(**just found some of those motherboard details myself**)

Also, did you get to try to find any nasty stuff while running things with just the interface (not sure how much you can actually do that way)?
More details on the noise would help too. (When does it show up, for how long, and does it stay that way?)

Just punched that board number up on Google, and one of the first few results was this thread:

http://hardware.mcse.ms/archive24-2005-12-262310.html

There's a link to a PDF manual for the board in there, if you don't already have it.

Intel's page is here:

http://www.intel.com/products/motherboa ... /index.htm

I guess the VGA is onboard, but you should still be able to bypass it with a card for testing. The chart on p.54 looks like that info you may need to find the ideal slot with. That board actually looks pretty good and I guess it's got the PCI-e slot, so if you can manage to do the new card upgrade offer, you'd be jumping over the whole regular 424 generation without replacing your interface.

The board is also a standard ATX, so you could swap to something if you absolutely have to.

That thread didn't sound like their BIOS's are all that great for tweak access, and I don't see mention of turning stuff off, so if you don't see it in there, it might still work to disable things from the Windows device manager. :?:

*** I take some of that back---> The Intel site has a pretty good troubleshooting section with a part about using add-on audio cards and turning the other off, so some of it probably can do that.

FWIW- SForge,Cakewalk and a few didn't used to be ASIO apps, but I think they all added it over time. They still may default to WDM or something.

Also, You probably don't want to hear this, but the best procedure would also probably be starting with a totally clean Windows install, to make sure it's not just some weird software conflict from all the tweaks, drivers, or apps you've run over time. I'll usually rip all my add-on cards, configure the BIOS like I need it, split my drive into a couple partitions (assuming you've got it all saved), or use 2 drives for the Ghosting, install Windows and point it whatever drivers I've got, clean up some temps and arrange some stuff, then do a Norton Ghost image. Then I'll proceed to add updates, drivers,basic apps,etc., and make another Ghost. Then start bringing in cards (important ones first), and periodically Ghosting (you can kill some of them later, and you DO have 120G's :wink: ). That way if things don't help or work, you can bounce back a step or two, and try something else with no "leftovers". I'd get the main audio app on there first, and try to get that noise issue resolved before adding any related software.

Post on how it goes, if you do any more.

George

Here are some brief quotes from that Nuendo post, if you haven't read it:
----------------------------------------------
I used my 324 on my MSI KT600 /AMD, but now it is on my older MSI 745 Ultra (SIS 745 chipset) /AMD

Both cards give low latency and no trouble, but avoid sharing IRQ's with anything. -That can be trickier than it sounds, since sometimes motherboard devices share with the PCI slots. That's why I chose the KT600 and SIS chipsets, the internal routing is a bit better.
Tony Ostinato also had this board, and he said it was solid, too.
I tried the Gigabyte board before my current KT600, and I had some bad
speed/ticks problems, had to exchange it. (PC Club is great!)
That was due to the NVidia's hard drive chip sharing with a PCI slot.
Maybe they worked that out later with drivers, but it was an early revision for me.

So then I chose the MSI KT600 (KT6 Delta-FIS2R)
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/ ... hp?UID=474
because the hard disk controllers were on an entirely different branch of the chip.
----------------------------------------------
P4 Pentium D 820 2.8 GHz processor dual core with 1gb ramINTERNAL 250Gsata 120 gb western digital external driveMOTU 2408 MK2 WITH 324 CARD NUENDO 3.o1 version and n2
WAVELAB 4.0 all runing solid
----------------------------------------------
(from me/Jidis) I don't know what this next crap is. I had it listed in that thread. It could be ones I saw in Cubase posts or something while I was looking, but don't hold me to it:

Gigabyte GA-7N400
MSi K7N2 Delta-ILSR
ASUS P4P800
ASUS P4PE2-x
gualso
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:41 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

PCI 324 //PIV 3Ghz

Post by gualso »

Dear George
after days and hours trying , tre problem is very rarely.

I suspect part of the problem seems to be electrical and other part any kind of imcompaatibiliy.
I Tryied disconnecting the cooler, changing the power suply the problem continues.
I Test my 2408 original in different electrical sockets in some presented the problem but that in other.
I Test my cpu with the PCI 324 in another studio with a 2408 mk2 ( I have the original one)and the noise was there.
It seems that the MOTU does not accept external sync in my system . (Optical, spdif) placing the word clock in internal and enslaving the other devices to the MOTU the noise seems to get out.
So what‘s the problem?
I can work slaving all my system form the MOTU, but some times I do need spdif ,sync( from mini disk) or ADAT sync.
In my old g4 I have always worked slaving the motu from a banck A optical yamah o2r .
Schould I try and older CPU system? or schould I work resigning spdif , adat, optical , sync??
Should motu release a new driver??
My Pc components are
Pentium 4 3Ghz Interl(r)
DDR2 SDRAM 1G
CHIPSET i945 G
MAIN BOARD D 945GNT
VIDEO CARD INTEL 82945G
HARD DRIVE WDG 120GB

PCI 324 original motu 2408 , and a yamaha 02r and a MTP AV


THANKS
ultrafinriz
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:26 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by ultrafinriz »

So the issue is clocking it sounds like.
You are clocked to your spdif input in the console? What is providing this clock source? Also I have had luck with the buffer set to 256 and legacy wav drivers checked.
Good Luck.

Jesse
UltraFinRiz
ultrafinriz
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:26 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by ultrafinriz »

FYI here is the 424 page:
http://www.motu.com/techsupport/technot ... patibility
It seems to be a matter of the physical connection you have on your motherboard for which model to get.
It goes 324 = 424 > 424x > 424e...

Jesse
User avatar
Jidis
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Virginia

Post by Jidis »

Jesse (and all), here's my long post for the day. :wink:

I'm pretty sure the G5 card is actually backward compatible to anything that took that first 424, and vice-versa. It was sort of an early-on replacement for it and fixed some compatibility issues in addition to the faster new PCI-X protocol. All in all, that first rev was likely a bit "premature". As cheaply made as the card appears to be, it's possible they could have even done a direct swap for anyone that trusted them enough to jump on it early on (they did for some recent buyers). I'm sure the 2408mk3 constituted the "bulk" of that package. But I guess it was all intentional anyway. The incompatibilities were probably an attempt to encourage people to use the higher performance boards, which did better in their extensive in-house testing, on the wide range of chipsets and systems they tested on, before sending it off for production or releasing the drivers. The two long jumpers glued to it are likely just to give it a sort of "hi-tech" appearance (I doubt they really go to anything). And the tilted FW jacks are probably for people who may be reaching "downward" behind their computer, at a slight angle, and may not have a clear view of what they're doing. I think they make it a bit easier to get the plugs in. Then again, maybe they were just in a hurry or on a budget.

FWIW- I'd also have to guess the 324 should theoretically be compatible with most of the same stuff as those first couple 4's. With the exception of that new "e" stuff, I think most of the many revisions to the PCI spec, could handle the previous 32 bit cards, just at the lower speed. I haven't really kept up with the non-PCI-e Macs, but most stuff will give you a variety, and/or use slots which can handle different speeds and supplies. I think a lot of the PCI-X cards will be "universals" (like the 424-G5), where, if they go in an old 5V slot, they just use some different contacts in it (thus the extra no-contact "notch" toward the outside end). When you run into "legacy" 32-bit standard PCI cards, which won't work somewhere in a newer machine's PCI slots, it's more likely that it: 1) Didn't conform to the old spec. 100% in the first place, or 2) It's drivers were never properly written or updated to support a decent variety of "spec. compliant" chipsets.

I have a feeling that with properly written drivers of a given "type" (like a WDM from 2K/XP vs. a VXD from 95/98 ), they should still be good, even through some evolutions of host/motherboard/CPU technologies and chipsets. With the speed that MOTU insists on switching hardware at, and their habit of dropping off driver support once they've gotten something that works for "most" people, there are the obvious possibilities that some of the incompatibility issues could have been worked out through driver software, if development saw it as a "priority", or that a rushed release or inadequate testing resulted in a hardware incompatibility, which was too difficult (or impossible) to resolve with any "driver code". ( - just tell the customers to upgrade or not to use that board or chipset)

I obviously don't make PCI cards myself, so anyone really interested should go read some firsthand facts on it to get the lowdown on any of that. I do, however, know that I've never had any trouble with moving any of my existing 5v/32bit PCI cards to any newly upgraded motherboard (yet). Also, as long as the companies are still around, and the slot is still a current standard, drivers have periodically shown up for minor changes in OS or chips, even for manufacturer's previous lines of hardware.

If you can sell it, you can support it. It's not impossible. Just don't "run with scissors".

Take care,

George
gualso
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:41 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Wich mother for the PCI 324??

Post by gualso »

Dear Frineds

Its clear upgrading my pci card could be a successful
solution. couldn‘t??

Obviously Im not a computer engineer, and undestanding the messages takes my a lot of time (I speak spanish),

In my country updating equipment and sound cards costs the twice than it costs in the USA or EUROPE. If in USA a pci costs u$s 300,costs 600 u$s 700 in Argentinan ,plus a very poor support , this is the reason why I want to look for all the alternatives to make work my old PCI 324. -

So I have two questions:do you know any mother board wich surely
work ok with my 324 PCI card and with a 2.8 pentium IV of 3,0G pentium IV?

Do you know any trick betwen the pci 324connectors and the mother board for making the card works correctly?
Thanks I‘ll be waiting...a miracle....



:wink: :wink:
ultrafinriz
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:26 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Wich mother for the PCI 324??

Post by ultrafinriz »

gualso wrote:
So I have two questions:do you know any mother board wich surely
work ok with my 324 PCI card and with a 2.8 pentium IV of 3,0G pentium IV?
I have a 324 PCI card and a pentium IV 2.4G (with hyperthreading) The motherboard is an ABIT IS7-G - it can take a processor up to 3G.

http://www.abit-usa.com/products/mb/pro ... 1&model=81
http://www2.abit.com.tw/abitweb/webjsp/ ... ies/01.php
Do you know any trick betwen the pci 324connectors and the mother board for making the card works correctly?
Thanks I‘ll be waiting...a miracle....
I don't understand. Does the card not fit in your motherboard slot?
You also were asking about clocking... Now I'm confused.

The only "tricks" I know I mentioned already. Slow the Front Side Buss (FSB) down to 400MHz in your BIOS. Try different buffer settings in the MOTU control panel. Use legacy wav drivers.



Jesse
UltraFinRiz
gualso
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:41 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: Wich mother for the PCI 324??

Post by gualso »

Thanks;
((I don't understand. Does the card not fit in your motherboard slot? You also were asking about clocking... Now I'm confused.))

sorry, may be I dont know how to express my self correctly.

Im not asking about clocking, Im asking for compatibility and incompatibilty, Im asking why my card doesn‘t work or sync slaving it from other devices.

The card fix perfectly in my mother board, it seems to work ok in internal work clock mode, but it doesn‘t work slaving it from other devices, (optilcal from Yamaha 02r or adat, spdif from minidisc, Adat sync, word clock even from MIDI time piece word clock) when I try this, the 2408 front panel looks like every thing is ok, but after recording, the audio is with ‘‘‘shhshhssfffff¨ ‘‘‘shhshhssfffff¨. The motu also does this on reproduction with cd imported audio.Or with a Reason Demo.or in soud forge.

I have tyied this ways of slaving syncing( external sync) in my g4 and works ok, but not on the pC.

My question is if does any knows what kind of problem could be this?: a hard ware compatibility , an electrical problem, a bios problem, an intel compatibility problem, etc

I have tyied the buffers. the IRQ, and a slower system (2.8g), changin slots.etc and the problem is still there.....sssfffff ssssfffffffff.

I havent tryied jet Slowing the Front Side Buss now I‘m going to. Ill try to get that mother you say.


You say you have hyperthreading. In the previous post, there is a link to motu tech, It says hyperthreading is not compatible whit original 424 or preivous one ( 324). http://www.motu.com/techsupport/technot ... patibility

Thanks any way I‘ll tell you the news.

if you have some more to say I‘ll be waiting.
Bye...

Gualso
ultrafinriz wrote:
gualso wrote:
So I have two questions:do you know any mother board wich surely
work ok with my 324 PCI card and with a 2.8 pentium IV of 3,0G pentium IV?
I have a 324 PCI card and a pentium IV 2.4G (with hyperthreading) The motherboard is an ABIT IS7-G - it can take a processor up to 3G.

http://www.abit-usa.com/products/mb/pro ... 1&model=81
http://www2.abit.com.tw/abitweb/webjsp/ ... ies/01.php
Do you know any trick betwen the pci 324connectors and the mother board for making the card works correctly?
Thanks I‘ll be waiting...a miracle....
I don't understand. Does the card not fit in your motherboard slot?
You also were asking about clocking... Now I'm confused.

The only "tricks" I know I mentioned already. Slow the Front Side Buss (FSB) down to 400MHz in your BIOS. Try different buffer settings in the MOTU control panel. Use legacy wav drivers.



Jesse
UltraFinRiz
Post Reply