Waves SSL Bundle
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Having used SSLs since the third studio in NY was equipped with a 4000E in the mid 80s I was really knocked out to hear these emulations, specially the channel strip dinamics,they are spot on, suddenly my little home setup sounded like a quarter of a million dollar SSL board. I think they are well worth the money, specially if you consider the cost to get that sound otherwise.
Mario
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Las Vegas
- Contact:
Re: Waves SSL Bundle
I checked AudioMidi's web site and they sell the plugin bundle for $600. Not bad and definitely worth a serious consideration.
G5 Quad, 30" Cinema, MOTU Traveler, KRK Rokit 6 Special Edition, DP 5.1, OS X 10.4.8
- mcevilley
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
I downloaded the demo today and, unfortunately, feel like I may have to own this one. It seems like it may have a bit of that magic you get from mixing on an SSL. I'd love to hear an A/B comparison done by anyone with an SSL and DP with the waves SSL plugs...any takers?
DP 9.52, Max OS 10.11, Mac Pro (early 2008), 2x2.8 dual quad core.
- hammerman
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Lynn, MA
- Contact:
There already is a comparison on the Gearslutz site:
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59002
and here:
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59093
Listen to the examples first and THEN read the comments...
Hmmm.......
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59002
and here:
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59093
Listen to the examples first and THEN read the comments...
Hmmm.......
- mcevilley
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Okay, thanks hammerman. I can't wait to listen to the comparison. If I can't tell the difference or (although it would be kind of strange...) like the waves version better, I guess I can kiss my $600 goodbye.hammerman wrote:There already is a comparison on the Gearslutz site:
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59002
and here:
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59093
Listen to the examples first and THEN read the comments...
Hmmm.......
DP 9.52, Max OS 10.11, Mac Pro (early 2008), 2x2.8 dual quad core.
Just did the test. Preferred the URS "1980" (their SSL comp) over the Waves. Avoid Waves like the plague. Go URS! It sounds better and more like the real SSL anyway. The Waves just killed the transients.mcevilley wrote:Okay, thanks hammerman. I can't wait to listen to the comparison. If I can't tell the difference or (although it would be kind of strange...) like the waves version better, I guess I can kiss my $600 goodbye.
Frankly I was more impressed by the emulation of the channel strip than I was by the quad compressor which I feel is a little less controllable than the real thing, you have a good point about the URS splinter, but I still think the Waves package is reasonable and relevant, the channel strip makes all the difference to me in this bundle.
Mario
- giles117
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Henderson County
- Contact:
I prefer the waves.
I didnt bother with his test I did my own test and found the URS to be a little loose sounding to me.
I cant judge a compressor based on what another guy does, I can only judge it based on my own use. That to me is the fallacy of a sound test. It doesnt take into account how you work.
I tried the matching of all parameters and the URS came out loose to me.
I didnt bother with his test I did my own test and found the URS to be a little loose sounding to me.
I cant judge a compressor based on what another guy does, I can only judge it based on my own use. That to me is the fallacy of a sound test. It doesnt take into account how you work.
I tried the matching of all parameters and the URS came out loose to me.
DP 6.02
Quad 3.0 Ghz, 8.0 GB RAM, 2 - 1TB HD, 5 - 500GB HD's (RAID)
MOTU HD192, 2408mk3, Microlite, UAD-1, UAD-2, Powercore, Lavry Blue AD/DA convertor, LA-610
Euphonix MC Control
29 years in this business and counting.....Loving every minute of it.....
Quad 3.0 Ghz, 8.0 GB RAM, 2 - 1TB HD, 5 - 500GB HD's (RAID)
MOTU HD192, 2408mk3, Microlite, UAD-1, UAD-2, Powercore, Lavry Blue AD/DA convertor, LA-610
Euphonix MC Control
29 years in this business and counting.....Loving every minute of it.....
- mcevilley
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
I just listened to the the two examples (waves/ ssl) in my studio on the monitors and I honestly couldn't hear any difference. I guess I'm going to have to get it.
By the way, I really got a kick out of all the people who were SO positive the first one was the SSL!
By the way, I really got a kick out of all the people who were SO positive the first one was the SSL!

DP 9.52, Max OS 10.11, Mac Pro (early 2008), 2x2.8 dual quad core.
I could tell an immediate difference on my 1" eMac speakers. Really. To me it was an obvious difference. The real SSL was open and snappy. The Waves plugs was flat and 2 dimensional. You really ought to listen to the URS comp though before you purchase. Go here: http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?t=59093mcevilley wrote:I just listened to the the two examples (waves/ ssl) in my studio on the monitors and I honestly couldn't hear any difference. I guess I'm going to have to get it.
By the way, I really got a kick out of all the people who were SO positive the first one was the SSL!
The reason most people don't like these tests is because they hate to have their biases revealed. Or they feel the need to justify their decisions (purchases.) I haven't bought either, so I stand nothing to lose.giles117 wrote:I didnt bother with his test I did my own test and found the URS to be a little loose sounding to me.
I cant judge a compressor based on what another guy does, I can only judge it based on my own use. That to me is the fallacy of a sound test. It doesnt take into account how you work.
I tried the matching of all parameters and the URS came out loose to me.
I thought this was a great test. He matched the settings by finding the greatest amount of phase cancellation between the plugs and the original. In other words, it was as close as the plug is going to get to the real thing. Based on that, you could form your own opinions witthout being "wrong." Listen and tell me which one you like. I liked the URS, as did most others compared to the Waves comp.
You said tthe URS was "loose" and that's exactly what I didn't like about the Waves plug - it was too grabby and killed the high end - where the URS sounded thick, but open. Granted neither matched the clarity of the real SSL, but if you're staying in the box the URS was the winner for me.
- giles117
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Henderson County
- Contact:
I have used the 1980 for a minute and enjoyed it to start but after the waves I prefer the waves. You can change settings and loosen up the comp if you so feel.Splinter wrote:The reason most people don't like these tests is because they hate to have their biases revealed. Or they feel the need to justify their decisions (purchases.) I haven't bought either, so I stand nothing to lose.giles117 wrote:I didnt bother with his test I did my own test and found the URS to be a little loose sounding to me.
I cant judge a compressor based on what another guy does, I can only judge it based on my own use. That to me is the fallacy of a sound test. It doesnt take into account how you work.
I tried the matching of all parameters and the URS came out loose to me.
I thought this was a great test. He matched the settings by finding the greatest amount of phase cancellation between the plugs and the original. In other words, it was as close as the plug is going to get to the real thing. Based on that, you could form your own opinions witthout being "wrong." Listen and tell me which one you like. I liked the URS, as did most others compared to the Waves comp.
You said tthe URS was "loose" and that's exactly what I didn't like about the Waves plug - it was too grabby and killed the high end - where the URS sounded thick, but open. Granted neither matched the clarity of the real SSL, but if you're staying in the box the URS was the winner for me.
However I also noticed that I had to hit the threshold an additional 6db for the URS to start compressing as much as the waves version, so there are differences. Basically I think it is a case of pick which comp you need for whcih style you are mixing.
I'd prolly use the URS on Jazz
DP 6.02
Quad 3.0 Ghz, 8.0 GB RAM, 2 - 1TB HD, 5 - 500GB HD's (RAID)
MOTU HD192, 2408mk3, Microlite, UAD-1, UAD-2, Powercore, Lavry Blue AD/DA convertor, LA-610
Euphonix MC Control
29 years in this business and counting.....Loving every minute of it.....
Quad 3.0 Ghz, 8.0 GB RAM, 2 - 1TB HD, 5 - 500GB HD's (RAID)
MOTU HD192, 2408mk3, Microlite, UAD-1, UAD-2, Powercore, Lavry Blue AD/DA convertor, LA-610
Euphonix MC Control
29 years in this business and counting.....Loving every minute of it.....
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
well, i may be out of the loop on this one since i am still using DP 4.12... i asked the tech guy at Waves and he said they didn't test the bundle on 4.12 so it may or may not work.
but, for what it's worth, on one of the listening tests, i picked the software not the real thing, hmmmmm...
i agree with others, mixing is often such a matter of style and experience that while someone can get great results with one set of software tools someone else would find the same tools unusable.
i guess i won't know for sure until i test the bundle... if i even can get it to run on my G4.
i will soon find out.
great thread Kwiz, thanks for starting it!
FM
FM coulda, shoulda and absolutely woulda.
but, for what it's worth, on one of the listening tests, i picked the software not the real thing, hmmmmm...
i agree with others, mixing is often such a matter of style and experience that while someone can get great results with one set of software tools someone else would find the same tools unusable.
i guess i won't know for sure until i test the bundle... if i even can get it to run on my G4.
i will soon find out.
great thread Kwiz, thanks for starting it!
FM
FM coulda, shoulda and absolutely woulda.
- mcevilley
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
I agree with you 100%, which is what I think the gearsluts test revealed. Although I sometimes think that if I had $800,000 to buy an SSL, my mixes would sound perfect everytime, this is not necessarily the case. A bad mix on an SSL still sounds bad. And, a great mix ITB can also sound really great.FM wrote:
but, for what it's worth, on one of the listening tests, i picked the software not the real thing, hmmmmm...
i agree with others, mixing is often such a matter of style and experience that while someone can get great results with one set of software tools someone else would find the same tools unusable.
.
The fact is, a LOT of hit records are mixed on SSL's, which do sound fantastic, but, it's also possible to stay ITB and have a darn good sounding record. Incidentally, after the test and a few remixes with the waves plugs demo, I think they can be a really nice addition to my aresenal.
DP 9.52, Max OS 10.11, Mac Pro (early 2008), 2x2.8 dual quad core.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Portland OR
- Contact:
Price at GC
What was your price? email me..Ggiles117 wrote:After over an hour of listening...
The Mix Bus Compressor is Here. Trust me you wanna run them with the analog mode on....Just warms up your sound so nicely.....
Good Job Waves. Still hate the company, but for this one it is worth it.
On My G5 they dont exact a heavy tax and they run wonderfully under DP.
Wonderful Pcs. Gonna remix a couple tunes that I mixed without them. God I missed the sound of analog and these come real real close.....
Lastly, the URS S never sounded as good as these. The S was modeled afer the E series EQ (or so they said.) It is very digital and sterile sounding compared to these puppies.
Finally look around. GC made me a wonderful offer800 is list.....
Gregory Ives Composer/Sound Designer/Producer