Difference between host buffer size and host safety offset?
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
Discussion related to installation, configuration and use of MOTU hardware such as MIDI interfaces, audio interfaces, etc. with Windows
Discussion related to installation, configuration and use of MOTU hardware such as MIDI interfaces, audio interfaces, etc. with Windows
Difference between host buffer size and host safety offset?
Hi,
It's not clear to me what the difference between the buffer size and the safety offset.
Which one gives me latency in sound?
I'm on 128 buffer size and tried 48 safety offset.
But lately my mk4 is acting weird so I'll go to 256 again i think.
Any advice here?
Point is that on 128 i still have a noticable latency when using my soundcard as mixer for the monitoring.
Also above 128 the synth play action is way to much delayed.
Host Buffer Size
When connected to a Windows host, the Host
Buffer Size menu (Figure 3-2) is available in the
Device tab (page 12). This setting determines the
amount of latency (delay) you may hear when live
audio is patched through your Windows audio
software. Smaller buffer sizes produce lower
latency, with sizes of 256 samples or less producing
virtually imperceptible delay. Many host
applications report audio hardware I/O latency, so
you can see what happens to the reported latency
when making adjustments to this setting.
Figure 3-2: Access the ‘Host Buffer Size’ and ‘Host Safety Offset’
settings in the web app Device tab for your MOTU interface.
Be careful with very small buffer sizes, as they can
cause performance issues from your host software
or PC.
☛ At sea level, audio travels approximately one
foot (30 cm) per millisecond. A latency of ten
milliseconds is about the same as being ten feet
(three meters) from an audio source.
Host Safety Offset
When connected to a Windows host, the Host
Safety Offset menu (Figure 3-2) also becomes
available. This setting allows you to fine tune host
latency. Larger offsets allow the driver more time to
process audio as it transfers to and from the
hardware. Lower settings produce lower latency,
but if you go too low, your host software may
experience performance issues. Generally
speaking, 48 samples should serve as a good
baseline setting. You can then experiment with
lower settings from there. Be mindful, however,
when reducing the safety offset, as this parameter
can have a significant impact on your computer
system’s performance.
It's not clear to me what the difference between the buffer size and the safety offset.
Which one gives me latency in sound?
I'm on 128 buffer size and tried 48 safety offset.
But lately my mk4 is acting weird so I'll go to 256 again i think.
Any advice here?
Point is that on 128 i still have a noticable latency when using my soundcard as mixer for the monitoring.
Also above 128 the synth play action is way to much delayed.
Host Buffer Size
When connected to a Windows host, the Host
Buffer Size menu (Figure 3-2) is available in the
Device tab (page 12). This setting determines the
amount of latency (delay) you may hear when live
audio is patched through your Windows audio
software. Smaller buffer sizes produce lower
latency, with sizes of 256 samples or less producing
virtually imperceptible delay. Many host
applications report audio hardware I/O latency, so
you can see what happens to the reported latency
when making adjustments to this setting.
Figure 3-2: Access the ‘Host Buffer Size’ and ‘Host Safety Offset’
settings in the web app Device tab for your MOTU interface.
Be careful with very small buffer sizes, as they can
cause performance issues from your host software
or PC.
☛ At sea level, audio travels approximately one
foot (30 cm) per millisecond. A latency of ten
milliseconds is about the same as being ten feet
(three meters) from an audio source.
Host Safety Offset
When connected to a Windows host, the Host
Safety Offset menu (Figure 3-2) also becomes
available. This setting allows you to fine tune host
latency. Larger offsets allow the driver more time to
process audio as it transfers to and from the
hardware. Lower settings produce lower latency,
but if you go too low, your host software may
experience performance issues. Generally
speaking, 48 samples should serve as a good
baseline setting. You can then experiment with
lower settings from there. Be mindful, however,
when reducing the safety offset, as this parameter
can have a significant impact on your computer
system’s performance.
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
I've never heard of host safety offset, but from the descriptions, it would seem that both affect latency.
2018 Mini i7 32G macOS 12.7.6, DP 11.33, Mixbus 10, Logic 10.7.9, Scarlett 18i8, MB Air M2, macOS 14.7.6, DP 11.33, Logic 11
- terrybritton
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 8:45 am
- Primary DAW OS: Windows
- Location: Elizabeth City, NC
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
As well as trying different settings in those, make sure you are not using any plugins that inherently introduce latency. Some EQ plugins and compressors do, as they are intended only for mixing and mastering, not for live monitoring and adding takes.
Terry
Terry
Last edited by terrybritton on Sat Jul 13, 2019 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Computer: Sweetwater CS400v7 Intel Core i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz | 64Gigs RAM | Windows 11 Pro x64 |
MOTU 828 mk3 hybrid
DAWs & Live: MOTU Digital Performer 11.31 | Cantabile Performer 4
Keyboard Synths: Kawai K5000s, Korg Wavestation
Controllers: NI Komplete Kontrol S-88 Mk3 & S-49 Mk2; Maschine Mk3 & JAM;
Akai MPK249 & 225, Alesis QX49, Behringer BCF2000 & FCB1010
Rack Modules: Ensoniq ESQm, Yamaha TX81Z, Wavestation SR
Tutorials: https://youtube.com/@CreatorsMediaTools
MOTU 828 mk3 hybrid
DAWs & Live: MOTU Digital Performer 11.31 | Cantabile Performer 4
Keyboard Synths: Kawai K5000s, Korg Wavestation
Controllers: NI Komplete Kontrol S-88 Mk3 & S-49 Mk2; Maschine Mk3 & JAM;
Akai MPK249 & 225, Alesis QX49, Behringer BCF2000 & FCB1010
Rack Modules: Ensoniq ESQm, Yamaha TX81Z, Wavestation SR
Tutorials: https://youtube.com/@CreatorsMediaTools
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 10395
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
This.terrybritton wrote:As well as trying different settings in those, make sure you are not using any plugins that inherently introduce latency. Some EQ plugins and compressors do as they are intended only for mixing and mastering, not for live monitoring and adding takes.
Terry
And it is important to note that any such plugins will still cause latency even when bypassed. Any such plugins (mastering limiters are the typical offender) must be removed from all channel strips to avoid their impact on latency.
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 10395
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
I believe you are correct bays but, as Mac users, we will never see the safety offset option. It is a PC only parameter.bayswater wrote:I've never heard of host safety offset, but from the descriptions, it would seem that both affect latency.
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 10395
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
The brevity of your response has me pondering your intended meaning and whether additional verbiage may have been inadvertently omitted. The possibilities intrigue...Godly wrote:Up
... yours (scandalous!)
... (a wonderful Disney film)
... Up and Away (another balloon reference)
and so on. But, please, rest assured I am not up(set).
If only Tim were still active here at MOTUNation. He would be at a loss for word.

Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
I think he was going for Bump. The post had gone unanswered for two days - the OP just wanted to put it at the top and have it show up in New Posts.
DP 11.34 PT 2024.10.2 Mixbus 11 VEP 7.x with various VIs
NI Komplete Audio 6 on HP Envy 8G i7 Quad Laptop Win11
MOTU 828es ADA8200 MTP-AV on HP Z2 G4 Xeon Workstation Win11
MOTU M4 on MacBook Air M2 2023 Sequoia.4.1
NI Komplete Audio 6 on HP Envy 8G i7 Quad Laptop Win11
MOTU 828es ADA8200 MTP-AV on HP Z2 G4 Xeon Workstation Win11
MOTU M4 on MacBook Air M2 2023 Sequoia.4.1
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 10395
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
I was having a little fun... just woke up, feeling groovy.CharlzS wrote:I think he was going for Bump. The post had gone unanswered for two days - the OP just wanted to put it at the top and have it show up in New Posts.
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
Slow down, you move too fast...HCMarkus wrote: I was having a little fun... just woke up, feeling groovy.
828x MacOS 14.7.5 M1 Studio Max 1TB 64G DP11.34
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 10395
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
cuttime wrote:Slow down, you move too fast...HCMarkus wrote: I was having a little fun... just woke up, feeling groovy.

Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
Haha, should i have said SEX to get your attentions hahaha.HCMarkus wrote:I was having a little fun... just woke up, feeling groovy.CharlzS wrote:I think he was going for Bump. The post had gone unanswered for two days - the OP just wanted to put it at the top and have it show up in New Posts.
But again on topic, still don't exactly know what it means.
I updated my mk4 to the latest firmware and i got allot more latency.
Seems that setting it to 256/256 instead of 128/64 as before, got me back to normal workable latency. Strange.
Good to know that Terry, I'll need to check my cantabile programs.
- HCMarkus
- Posts: 10395
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
- Contact:
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
From MOTU:
Host Buffer Size
When connected to a Windows host, the Host Buffer Size menu (Figure 1) is available. This setting determines the amount of latency (delay) you may hear when live audio is patched through your Windows audio software. Smaller buffer sizes produce lower latency, with sizes of 256 samples or less producing virtually imperceptible delay. Many host applications report audio hardware I/O latency, so you can see what happens to the reported latency when making adjustments to this setting. Be careful with very small buffer sizes, as they can cause performance issues from your host software or PC.
Host Safety Offset
When connected to a Windows host, the Host Safety Offset menu (Figure 1) also becomes available. This setting allows you to fine tune host latency. Larger offsets allow the driver more time to process audio as it transfers to and from the hardware. Lower settings produce lower latency, but if you go too low, your host software may experience performance issues. Generally speaking, 48 samples should serve as a good baseline setting.You can then experiment with lower settings from there. Be mindful, however, when reducing the safety offset, as this parameter can have a significant impact on your computer system’s performance.
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
You may be underestimating the average age of the list regulars.Godly wrote:Haha, should i have said SEX to get your attentions hahaha.
2018 Mini i7 32G macOS 12.7.6, DP 11.33, Mixbus 10, Logic 10.7.9, Scarlett 18i8, MB Air M2, macOS 14.7.6, DP 11.33, Logic 11
Re: Difference between host buffer size and host safety offs
Thx, i also have the manual.HCMarkus wrote:From MOTU:
Host Buffer Size
When connected to a Windows host, the Host Buffer Size menu (Figure 1) is available. This setting determines the amount of latency (delay) you may hear when live audio is patched through your Windows audio software. Smaller buffer sizes produce lower latency, with sizes of 256 samples or less producing virtually imperceptible delay. Many host applications report audio hardware I/O latency, so you can see what happens to the reported latency when making adjustments to this setting. Be careful with very small buffer sizes, as they can cause performance issues from your host software or PC.
Host Safety Offset
When connected to a Windows host, the Host Safety Offset menu (Figure 1) also becomes available. This setting allows you to fine tune host latency. Larger offsets allow the driver more time to process audio as it transfers to and from the hardware. Lower settings produce lower latency, but if you go too low, your host software may experience performance issues. Generally speaking, 48 samples should serve as a good baseline setting.You can then experiment with lower settings from there. Be mindful, however, when reducing the safety offset, as this parameter can have a significant impact on your computer system’s performance.
But what does it mean