What is the best choice for digital performer?

Macintosh software/hardware discussion and troubleshooting

Moderator: James Steele

Post Reply
User avatar
pagano
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:04 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

What is the best choice for digital performer?

Post by pagano »

hi all,

I'm a french user who want to buy in a few days digital performer and a brand new G5.

My question is:

What can i expect about digital performer 4.61 with a G5 2X2ghz?? How many MIDI tracks, audio tracks, and virtual instruments?? I learnt that "DP" is more CPU consuming than for exemple Logic Pro.

I know that this question is a little bit difficult to answer but i really need to know if i will work worrying.

Thank you for your answer. Best regards.
User avatar
giles117
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Henderson County
Contact:

Post by giles117 »

Check my sig. I run DP :)

Yes Logic is more efficient with the VI's but sucks in the audio department.....No where near as easy to work with as DP
DP 6.02
Quad 3.0 Ghz, 8.0 GB RAM, 2 - 1TB HD, 5 - 500GB HD's (RAID)
MOTU HD192, 2408mk3, Microlite, UAD-1, UAD-2, Powercore, Lavry Blue AD/DA convertor, LA-610
Euphonix MC Control

29 years in this business and counting.....Loving every minute of it.....
User avatar
qo
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: What is the best choice for digital performer?

Post by qo »

pagano wrote:What can i expect about digital performer 4.61 with a G5 2X2ghz?? How many MIDI tracks, audio tracks, and virtual instruments?? I learnt that "DP" is more CPU consuming than for exemple Logic Pro.
Bonjour pagano,

Yes, you are right that this is a hard question to answer since there are many variables that influence performance. Things like:

1. Sample rate
2. Configured buffer settings (lower settings equal higher CPU, but less latency)
3. What VI's you plan to use
4. Hard drive speed and whether the drive is dedicated to tracking

And, to a lesser extent:

4. RAM installed (more RAM allows for less paging).
5. Your audio interface (PCI vs Firewire) and the efficiency of its driver

There are people using DP on a 2x2 G5 with no complaints. And, I'd also bet there are people in the "Optimize MAS" thread that own a 2x2 G5. So, yes, it all depends on what your typical projects look like and how that G5 and DP is configured.

I have a dual 2.7 G5 and I'm sure that even it will max out when running 96/24 with small buffer size and a few Reactor plugins with complex patches instantiated (though, I've never tried this).
User avatar
pagano
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:04 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by pagano »

thanks to all the people who answer to my question.

I plan to buy a G5 2x2.3ghz with external hard drive and 2 or 3 gigas of RAM. I use to play with approximatly:

7 or 8 Virtual instruments and 16 audios tracks. Do you think this configuration will be right for this kind of project?

The answer is in your hands... :wink:

Thanks to help a poor french user :wink:
User avatar
giles117
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Henderson County
Contact:

Post by giles117 »

Unless you are running a very low buffer (say 64 or 128) you will be fine.....
DP 6.02
Quad 3.0 Ghz, 8.0 GB RAM, 2 - 1TB HD, 5 - 500GB HD's (RAID)
MOTU HD192, 2408mk3, Microlite, UAD-1, UAD-2, Powercore, Lavry Blue AD/DA convertor, LA-610
Euphonix MC Control

29 years in this business and counting.....Loving every minute of it.....
Post Reply