Altiverb vs Lexicon PCM91 ??
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
Altiverb vs Lexicon PCM91 ??
How would users of the Altiverb rate it as compared to the Lexicon PCM91 or similar reverbs?
- qo
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
Re: Altiverb vs Lexicon PCM91 ??
I'm assuming you mean the hardware version of the Lexicon? I have a PCM90 (hardware) and find Altiverb is a much more useful/versatile tool. But, I never did like the PCM90 that much anyway. Paid $2500 for it back in 1997, which is a tad more than Altiverbpositivemu wrote:How would users of the Altiverb rate it as compared to the Lexicon PCM91 or similar reverbs?

-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Contact:
Altiverb is a convolution reverb and works in a complete different way than a Lexicon or similar, so i think it can't be compared.
Convolution reverbs create very realistic natural rooms (also artificial ones, depenent on IR) but you may miss edit- features.
Both great tools, but different
Convolution reverbs create very realistic natural rooms (also artificial ones, depenent on IR) but you may miss edit- features.
Both great tools, but different
Studio Setup: G4 1.25, 24 i/o 10.4, Analog Console
Live Setup: PB 12", 867
Live Setup: PB 12", 867
- qo
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
Altiverb uses Altivec, so offloads a lot of DSP onto that. I did a test comparing it to Waves IR-1 (from a CPU utilization perspective). Search this forum for "Waves Altiverb" and that post should show up.
I wouldn't say that Altiverb and PCM91 are not comparable. They are both reverbs. Yes, their edit features are different, but so are the edit features of many EQ's. But, you'd use them in the same situations. Hence, IMHO, one can make comparisons between the two as to their suitability for a given job.
Having Altiverb (and Waves IR-1) and the Lexicon PCM90, I can say I don't really miss the edit features of the Lexicon. The nicest thing I can say about the Lexicon menu system is that it was developed during the 20th century, so it has that, uh, cost-reductionist vibe about it, heh.
I wouldn't say that Altiverb and PCM91 are not comparable. They are both reverbs. Yes, their edit features are different, but so are the edit features of many EQ's. But, you'd use them in the same situations. Hence, IMHO, one can make comparisons between the two as to their suitability for a given job.
Having Altiverb (and Waves IR-1) and the Lexicon PCM90, I can say I don't really miss the edit features of the Lexicon. The nicest thing I can say about the Lexicon menu system is that it was developed during the 20th century, so it has that, uh, cost-reductionist vibe about it, heh.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Contact:
You're right, Lexicon menu is... It's horrible to edit.qo wrote:Having Altiverb (and Waves IR-1) and the Lexicon PCM90, I can say I don't really miss the edit features of the Lexicon. The nicest thing I can say about the Lexicon menu system is that it was developed during the 20th century, so it has that, uh, cost-reductionist vibe about it, heh.
I didn't want to be specific about Altiverb vs PCM90.
The RESULT of both is reverb. It's created in different ways, so the results are different. This makes it hard to compare.
Studio Setup: G4 1.25, 24 i/o 10.4, Analog Console
Live Setup: PB 12", 867
Live Setup: PB 12", 867
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with you guys. Altiverb sounds okay on short settings, but on longer ones, it sounds rather metalic and fake. Compared to a Lexicon, there is less"music" in the verb, and is sounds decidedly more collapsed than a Lexicon. Much more "mono" sounding, far less rich. Do a careful listening test, it's not subtle...
- Shooshie
- Posts: 19820
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Dallas
- Contact:
Ummm... just how long a tail do you need to add to an Altiverb example before you start getting this fake, metallic texture? I've heard everything up to cathedral lengths, and I have yet to hear anything but pure, clean, clear reverb. What am I missing? Subtle ears?pcm wrote:I'm sorry, but I can't agree with you guys. Altiverb sounds okay on short settings, but on longer ones, it sounds rather metalic and fake. Compared to a Lexicon, there is less"music" in the verb, and is sounds decidedly more collapsed than a Lexicon. Much more "mono" sounding, far less rich. Do a careful listening test, it's not subtle...

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
- Spikey Horse
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:50 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
positivemu - Why don't you try the Altiverb 5 Demo download from audioease.com.
It is fully functioning but with limited no. of presets and a 'beep' (which is reverbed too, so it's not too distracting).
Regardig CPU, this latest version is not only more efficient than previous versions but has a few new features to reduce load even further if needed...
If you don't want to install demo there is a QT video demonstration of Altiverb 5 on the site, too.
Regarding the sound, all I can say is be warned: if you try the demo with your own work - you *will* want to buy it!
It is fully functioning but with limited no. of presets and a 'beep' (which is reverbed too, so it's not too distracting).
Regardig CPU, this latest version is not only more efficient than previous versions but has a few new features to reduce load even further if needed...
If you don't want to install demo there is a QT video demonstration of Altiverb 5 on the site, too.
Regarding the sound, all I can say is be warned: if you try the demo with your own work - you *will* want to buy it!

One point no one has mentioned yet is that Lexicon uses chorusing to achieve movement in their reverb tails - something that Altiverb doesn't have. It's part of the Lex signature, and while not very realistic, is a valid and interesting sound. The closest plugins I've heard to Lex are the various TC Powercore plugins - VSS, DVR2, and ClassicVerb, which all incorporate some modulation parameters.
- qo
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
TC vs Lexicon. I gotta agree with fokof. I prefer even low end TC (e.g. M-ONE) over the PCM90 (I'm not sure what the difference is between the 90 and 91 though, maybe it's huge?). Of course, the M-ONE is a more recent 'verb, with more DSP at it's disposal and is 24 bit. Then again, I preferred the Yamaha REV5 over the PCM90 and the REV5 is a much older unit. I guess it's becoming evident that I don't much like the PCM90. It never grew on me even after 8 years 
