MOTUNATION (formerly UnicorNation) is an independent community for discussing Digital Performer and other MOTU audio software and hardware. It is not affiliated with MOTU.
Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
Prime Mover wrote:Phil O, I'm not quite understanding how that would really be effective. Wouldn't it just high-notch cut every time your signal got loud?
Well, no. The filter is used to just send the esses to the side-chain. What you want to do is filter out everthing EXCEPT the esses on the duplicate track and sent that to the compressor's side chain.
Phil
DP 11.34. 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 15.3/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
Ahhh, got it now. Not a bad solution. Question is, what sounds better: compressed esses or EQ reshaped esses?
I guess with your method there's less/no chance of lisping. However, I've always felt that part of the unwanted aesthetic of harsh esses was that they're overly bright, not just too loud. I dunno, is there a way of side-chaining a filter with the original signal to also shape the esses? That would be nifty.
Chalk thiks up for one of the reasons I'd like to see a scripting language implemented into a DAW. You could just write a script inside a VI to translate a sidechain signal boost into a filter cut, or something.
Prime Mover wrote:Ahhh, got it now. Not a bad solution. Question is, what sounds better: compressed esses or EQ reshaped esses?
Given that esses are usually isolated, in other words, there's no pitch at the same time, turning down volume, and turning down high end is pretty much the same thing.
I usually use volume automation, unless they're all over the place and I don't have time to manually catch them... then I'll use the UAD Precision De-Esser.
Prime Mover wrote:I dunno, is there a way of side-chaining a filter with the original signal to also shape the esses? That would be nifty.
Sure, there's no need to do one or the other. You can always do both. I'm not a big fan of de-essers myself, but the OP was asking for info on them so I didn't bring up other techniques.
I'm with Tim on this one. I have to deal with ess problems so infrequently, that I usually prefer to use volume automation. A de-esser is really just a time saver IMO.
Phil
DP 11.34. 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 15.3/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.