Control surface recommendations

Discussion of Digital Performer use, optimization, tips and techniques on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
User avatar
iGirl
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:53 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: California
Contact:

Control surface recommendations

Post by iGirl »

I'm looking for input on low budget options, compatible with DP5. Hopefully something that is as close to plug and play as possible. My only requirements are - it needs to have 100mm fader(s) and transport controls (no Behringer BCF2000 which is unexplainably missing them). Also a decent build quality...at least to last more than 6 months.

My budget tops out at a used, ebay Mackie Control Universal - which are well sub $400.
The PreSonus Faderport looks interesting, nice even - but not sure about the limits of one single fader and being tethered. Even a Baby HUI is almost interesting, except that it's over 10 years old and MIDI only. Again, faders, and transport - what else is out there? Include Ebay items not currently manufactured, but new enough to work via USB...

I've been away from the business for some time, but was surprised to see DP having lost so much traction in retail and 3rd party support...at least that's the impression I get. More often than not DP support isn't even mentioned in the bullet points.
Started using Performer when it was version 1.0 !
User avatar
Albert Bacardit
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:03 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by Albert Bacardit »

Perhaps you would like to upgrade to DP 7.21 and use an Euphonix MC Mix. Doing pretty well here.
MacBook Pro 2.2, 16G RAM, OS 10.12.5, DP 9.5, Ultralite, MC Mix, A7s, Guitars, Keyboards, Amps, VIs and Plugins.
User avatar
iGirl
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:53 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by iGirl »

The Euphonix MC and required DP upgrade is well over 4x the stated budget, though it looks nice. One thing that really confounded me is it's "transport" controls. Reaching all the way over the faders to be able to control the transport is really poor design, not to mention that the buttons themselves are not very big either. Were I looking in that range, those things would be deal breakers for me.
Started using Performer when it was version 1.0 !
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 10395
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by HCMarkus »

Alpha Track works great with DP
antonborisov
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:19 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Russia

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by antonborisov »

I have FaderPort and I couldn't really recommend it.

FaderPort is not really a control surface. I've yet to try it with DP, however I've used it with Logic a lot. The only valuable part of it is the fader itself, but it's only one and i'm not sure how it's different from riding faders by mouse. The latter is actually faster.

Pan knob doesn't work (this is a known issue), buttons are made of hard plastic and way too stiff. Unit itself is quite compact but all connectors are on the back (btw, you need at least USB and power), so it could be a problem to choose place for it on the desk.

However, multi-color lights are cool and I think it's nice looking piece of hardware, considering the price. I mean if you don't really use it.
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by James Steele »

antonborisov wrote:The only valuable part of it is the fader itself, but it's only one and i'm not sure how it's different from riding faders by mouse. The latter is actually faster.
I have an AlphaTrack... so it's functionally very similar. I love mine. I used it placed near my left hand. Being able to click on a track in the TOV (Track OverView) with my right hand and then adjust on the AlphaTrack fader with my left, is very fast for me and I feel I have better control over the adjustment than by using the mouse.

I don't use the transport controls on the AT much at all, but use the fader quite a bit.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
Dan Worley
Posts: 2778
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:03 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Northern CA

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by Dan Worley »

James Steele wrote:
antonborisov wrote:The only valuable part of it is the fader itself, but it's only one and i'm not sure how it's different from riding faders by mouse. The latter is actually faster.
I have an AlphaTrack... so it's functionally very similar. I love mine. I used it placed near my left hand. Being able to click on a track in the TOV (Track OverView) with my right hand and then adjust on the AlphaTrack fader with my left, is very fast for me and I feel I have better control over the adjustment than by using the mouse.

I don't use the transport controls on the AT much at all, but use the fader quite a bit.
Please excuse the interruption.

James, I kept thinking I was going to get an AlphaTrack but I never did. Then we got an iPad and DP Control and I completely forgot about it. I'm wondering if you have written fader automation using DP Control on your iPad yet. I was just getting into that (and I thought it was great but needed more time to experiment) when the iPad I was using went on a trip with my business partner. :( But I'm curious to how you think the the AlphaTrack and iPad compare in feel, accuracy and convenience? I mean, I know they're totally different animals, but which would you prefer for riding a fader? The multi-touch of the iPad is fantastic and I can't wait for MOTU to come out with a dedicated iPad version of DP Control (assuming they will at some point).

Thanks,

Dan Worley
DP10.13
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by James Steele »

Dan Worley wrote:James, I kept thinking I was going to get an AlphaTrack but I never did. Then we got an iPad and DP Control and I completely forgot about it. I'm wondering if you have written fader automation using DP Control on your iPad yet. I was just getting into that (and I thought it was great but needed more time to experiment) when the iPad I was using went on a trip with my business partner. :( But I'm curious to how you think the the AlphaTrack and iPad compare in feel, accuracy and convenience? I mean, I know they're totally different animals, but which would you prefer for riding a fader? The multi-touch of the iPad is fantastic and I can't wait for MOTU to come out with a dedicated iPad version of DP Control (assuming they will at some point).
Well...

1) I have no idea if MOTU will come out with an iPad version. I sure hope they do, as it would be a shame if not.

2) To be honest, I don't do a lot of serious mixing. A friend of mine, Jim Watson, does the mixing of most stuff I do, hence I don't really write much automation, however....

3) As far as "feel" goes, I'm not sure as I've really gotten to like the Alpha Track. I think if a company came out with a iPad version of Alpha Track it would be cool. But one thing a real, physical fader does is provide tactile feedback and as a result a certain amount of confidence. For example, you don't have to look at the Alpha Track to know your finger is on the fader or not.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
Dan Worley
Posts: 2778
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:03 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Northern CA

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by Dan Worley »

James Steele wrote:
Dan Worley wrote:James, I kept thinking I was going to get an AlphaTrack but I never did. Then we got an iPad and DP Control and I completely forgot about it. I'm wondering if you have written fader automation using DP Control on your iPad yet. I was just getting into that (and I thought it was great but needed more time to experiment) when the iPad I was using went on a trip with my business partner. :( But I'm curious to how you think the the AlphaTrack and iPad compare in feel, accuracy and convenience? I mean, I know they're totally different animals, but which would you prefer for riding a fader? The multi-touch of the iPad is fantastic and I can't wait for MOTU to come out with a dedicated iPad version of DP Control (assuming they will at some point).
Well...

1) I have no idea if MOTU will come out with an iPad version. I sure hope they do, as it would be a shame if not.

2) To be honest, I don't do a lot of serious mixing. A friend of mine, Jim Watson, does the mixing of most stuff I do, hence I don't really write much automation, however....

3) As far as "feel" goes, I'm not sure as I've really gotten to like the Alpha Track. I think if a company came out with a iPad version of Alpha Track it would be cool. But one thing a real, physical fader does is provide tactile feedback and as a result a certain amount of confidence. For example, you don't have to look at the Alpha Track to know your finger is on the fader or not.
Okay, thanks for that. I think I'll just stay with the iPad and DP Control and forget all about an AlphaTrack.

c-ya,

Dan Worley
DP10.13
User avatar
burn em
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:08 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by burn em »

Save your' money and get an MC Mix! Really! :dance: :dance: :dance:
Macbook Pro i7 17"-10.6.8 16Gb DP 7.24 ][ G5 dual 2 ghz pci, 4Gb-10.4.11 DP 7.12
Nomad Factory ][ Airwindows Gatelope (The best drums gate. buy it!) ][ Altiverb 6
MOTU 828 mkIII, 828 mkI x3, 8Pre ][ Apogee AD16, DA16 & Duet ][ MC Mix ][ API 3124+ ][ Toft ATB 24
User avatar
Yawnstrosity
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:40 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by Yawnstrosity »

I don't know if it's appropriate for what you're doing, but the M-Audio UC33e is a pretty good budget option. I got a new one for $169.
Roland Ottewell
------------------------------------------------------
iMac 3.1GHz Intel Core i7, OSX 10.8.5, Apogee Duet, DP 7.24
User avatar
bolla
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sydney Australia
Contact:

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by bolla »

The Alphatrack works well for me.
I don't really use its transport functions.
Setting levels and volume rides using the fader is so much faster and intuitive for me than mousing.
I also use the send,pan and automation on/off quite a bit.
It's only annoying thing is that you have to select the track name field for it to function. It doesn't follow the track that is record enabled unless you have also selected the track name field.
Cheers, AB
8 Core 2.8 10.11.1 DP 8.07 | Dual 2.5 G5 VEP Slave | PC i7 920 VEP Slave | UAD Sat Quad | MiniMoog
User avatar
Tim
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: So Cal

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by Tim »

I use the AT, mostly just for fader and pan. I like it fine, but lately it's been dropping communication with DP (since DP7 I think). Disconnecting and reconnecting it's usb will bring it back. I've reinstalled the AT software and drivers (which haven't been updated in ages), and no change.
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Control surface recommendations

Post by James Steele »

FWIW-- I have no issues with dropped communication with DP 7.2. Because AT gets all it's power from the USB connection, I do not have it connected to a hub but directly to a USB port on my Mac.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5 Public Beta 2, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
Tim
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: So Cal

Re: Control surface recommendations

Post by Tim »

Well I do have it on a powered hub, as the computer is in another (machine) room.

I will sus out the usb path, but there have been no hardware changes since when it was always working, only software upgrades.
Post Reply