Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

The forum for petitions, theoretical discussion, gripes, or other off topic discussion.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
The forum for petitions, theoretical discussion, gripes, or other matters outside deemed outside the scope of helping users make optimal use of MOTU hardware and software. Posts in other forums may be moved here at the moderators discretion. No politics or religion!!
benmrx
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:07 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by benmrx »

FMiguelez wrote:I know nothing of Reaper. But then, I don't need to.

It clearly is inferior to DP in MANY ways, is it not?
- What can I do with it that I can't with DP?
The only thing I've heard about is latency compensation for external hardware. I don't use external hardware, so I don't care.
So as you can see, I have no reason to even want to try it.
Sorry to barge into the debate between you two... but how can you say that Reaper is clearly inferior to DP when you also say you havn't tried it..... or how can you say that Latency Compensation is the only thing it can do that DP can't... when you haven't tried it.

I also have both DP and Reaper and can 100% confirm that there are a host of things Reaper can do that DP can't... that go well beyond the scope of latency compensation... are there things that DP can do that Reaper can't...?? Of course.... so.. they can both do things the other can't... how does that end in Reaper being inferior?? Here's just a few (only a few) things Reaper can do that DP can't:
  • Grid can be both absolute and relative (ohhh.... my grid woes....)
  • Apply plugins on both tracks and independent regions without the need to render... it works the same in both cases, you can go back, re-arrange, delete, add, etc... this is amazingly useful! Reversing regions works the same way... no rendering....
  • Can set the track to 'record output'... even folders can be set to 'record output' for recording the output of the folder... no need to create new tracks, busses, etc.
  • Folders are present in the mixer and not just in the edit/arrange
  • Can apply the same plugin and/or buss send to multiple tracks in one single click
  • Buss sends can have ANY default volume setting... want them to default to unity.. done, default to -Inf... done... how about -6... done...
  • Can customize how the plugins are listed/organized to your hearts content
  • MIDI tracks can be set on a track by track basis to be in overdub or replace mode... or even "touch replace mode"
  • I can list more if you want....
Just to be fair.. here's a few VERY nice things DP can do that Reaper can't
  • Easily view and edit multiple tracks in a single MIDI editor
  • Various dedicated shapes for automation and CC's (sine, square, spline, etc.)
  • A MUUUUUCH better system for takes/comping
  • Generate streamers/flutters/punches
  • Proper 'auto input mode' for overdubbing (Reapers is kinda buggy/wierd)
  • Proper independent editing tools (not everyone likes the constant 'smart tool'.. I know I don't.. though most of the time I do... especially with MIDI editing
  • Again... I can list more here too...
Some of those are going to be deal breakers for both apps depending on who you are.....

Neither is superior... neither is inferior... it will just depend on what your workflow is, what your habits are, the type of work you do, etc. I.E., if I were scoring a film I'de rather use DP, but if I were doing sound design for a film I'de rather use Reaper. If I were recording a full band I'd rather use DP, if I were working with a solo singer songwriter I'de rather use Reaper, if I were mainly doing electroncia I'de use Ableton Live....
At the studio: 2" Sony/MCI 24 Track, 36x24 Neotek IIIC, Modest rack and mic selection, PTLE 7.4, 002R, Apogee AD8000, PPC Mac 2.7Ghz + 4GB Ram, OSX 10.4.9

Check out my completely out of date studio website: http://www.mysteriousredx.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

At Home: Intel iMac dual 3.06Ghz + 4GB Ram, OSX 10.6.2, DP7.12, Logic 9.1.1, Numerology 2.3
bongo_x
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by bongo_x »

benmrx wrote:

[*]Apply plugins on both tracks and independent regions without the need to render... it works the same in both cases, you can go back, re-arrange, delete, add, etc... this is amazingly useful! Reversing regions works the same way... no rendering....
To sidetrack this even more (I live for that), does this work like Tracktion? I don’t know if you’re familiar with that, but it was really great. You could drop a plugin on a region and it would operate as a real time plugin but affect only that region, no need to automate it on and off.

You could also take a MIDI track ( with the VI on that track) and tell it to render and that track would become an audio track with the rendered audio.

I wish they hadn’t abandoned it.

bb
benmrx
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:07 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by benmrx »

bongo_x wrote:
benmrx wrote:

[*]Apply plugins on both tracks and independent regions without the need to render... it works the same in both cases, you can go back, re-arrange, delete, add, etc... this is amazingly useful! Reversing regions works the same way... no rendering....
To sidetrack this even more (I live for that), does this work like Tracktion? I don’t know if you’re familiar with that, but it was really great. You could drop a plugin on a region and it would operate as a real time plugin but affect only that region, no need to automate it on and off.

You could also take a MIDI track ( with the VI on that track) and tell it to render and that track would become an audio track with the rendered audio.

I wish they hadn’t abandoned it.

bb
Pretty much yeah... just like you might put an EQ, then Compressor across your kick... you can do the same thing on independent regions.. then if you want to switch it so the compressor comes first.. just swap 'em around... it works the exact same way as you would when using plugins across 'tracks'. This gets pretty powerful when using 'item grouping'..

VI's have an option called 'render to stem' which does exactly what I think you're talking about... never used Tracktion.

Another VERY nice thing that might not seem that great until you use it.... is that the program takes less than 2 seconds to open... it's almost instant....
At the studio: 2" Sony/MCI 24 Track, 36x24 Neotek IIIC, Modest rack and mic selection, PTLE 7.4, 002R, Apogee AD8000, PPC Mac 2.7Ghz + 4GB Ram, OSX 10.4.9

Check out my completely out of date studio website: http://www.mysteriousredx.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

At Home: Intel iMac dual 3.06Ghz + 4GB Ram, OSX 10.6.2, DP7.12, Logic 9.1.1, Numerology 2.3
User avatar
IAMLFO
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:31 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by IAMLFO »

Hey James,
I take off for the movies and when I get back I see that the stars are aligning! I totally get where you are coming from, the opensource world and traditional software license world are almost generational gap topics. Believe me, I make my living working with Linux on, of all things, mainframes. There is *nothing* in the world of computing that is more separated by different modes of thought than 55 year old system programmers and Linux admins. Lol!

I'll give you a good example. When I stated what I did about companies who don't change will lose you came back with `can't' change. I get this all the time at work. Some System z guy who has been working MVS for the past 30 years is being told to run Linux on his System z and his reaction is `I can't change'. Well, I show him that he can, then he does and he has more job security for the 5 or 10 years he has left in his career. The same goes for companies. I dont care if MOTU (or any other company) has been writing DAW software for the past 25 years. If companies are unable to change they *will* lose market share and eventually go under. That is true in any industry. How does, MOTU for example, change? Well, perhaps they continue to diversify with more virtual instruments. Perhaps instead of creating guitar amps that most users don't care about they add plug-ins to DP that more users care about. Perhaps they start charging less for DP that has fewer built-in plug-ins and starts charging for MOTU plug-ins. There are a thousand ways to go. With the competative landscape you cannot continue doing the same thing over and over again or you will get left behind. Apple learned that lesson, that is why Jobs was brought back. Believe me, as an individual who has purchased MOTU hardware and software I want the company to do well.

I get what you are saying about a `cloud' being over the user base especially because you don't align well with the opensource community. Ok, it is a stigma that isn't going to go away so most of us will just need to let it slide off our backs. The last thing I will say is that, as an active member of the opensource community for over a decade, I have found the good heavily outweigh the bad apples. Hence, I bristle at the stereotype.

As a quick point of information, the Reaper evaluation box opens everytime an unregistered copy of Reaper starts up. There is a countdown button that starts at a higher increment with each new start so the user has to wait longer to be able to hit the continue button. Also, my good buddy FMeguilez states that Reaper is free multiple times, almost as many as he calls Reaper a toy. :wink:

DP is a great program. It can do several things Reaper can't and vice-versa. What people don't understand about Reaper is that it has `grown up' very quickly. The development cycle is very fast and the code quality speaks for itself. Simply outstanding. Reaper is a lean, efficient, feature rich application. Maybe people think it is a toy or whatever because they are not used to a product maturing so quickly. They are used to looong development cycles that don't always result in the quality offering users hoped for. Believe it or not, it is completely different with Reaper and it is one of the reasons I use it.

Last of all, I do agree that the fader buttons are identical and that is a real shame. If it does not change I won't be using the theme. As I stated before, I will not condone piracy in any form.

-Kevin
24" 2.4 Ghz iMac, OSX 10.4.10, MOTU 828 MK2, 2 Glyph 250 Gig external drives, DP 5.12, Cubase SX 3, Logic 8, DP 5, Finale 2008, GPO, Strad, Gro, JABB, Reason 4, EWQL Storm Drum, Adrenaline, Symphonic Choirs, Orchestra Gold, All Arturia Synths, Many NI Synths, Atmosphere, RMX, Banshee Talkbox
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22845
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by James Steele »

IAMLFO wrote:Hey James,
I take off for the movies and when I get back I see that the stars are aligning! I totally get where you are coming from, the opensource world and traditional software license world are almost generational gap topics. Believe me, I make my living working with Linux on, of all things, mainframes. There is *nothing* in the world of computing that is more separated by different modes of thought than 55 year old system programmers and Linux admins. Lol!

I'll give you a good example. When I stated what I did about companies who don't change will lose you came back with `can't' change. I get this all the time at work. Some System z guy who has been working MVS for the past 30 years is being told to run Linux on his System z and his reaction is `I can't change'. Well, I show him that he can, then he does and he has more job security for the 5 or 10 years he has left in his career. The same goes for companies. I dont care if MOTU (or any other company) has been writing DAW software for the past 25 years. If companies are unable to change they *will* lose market share and eventually go under. That is true in any industry. How does, MOTU for example, change? Well, perhaps they continue to diversify with more virtual instruments. Perhaps instead of creating guitar amps that most users don't care about they add plug-ins to DP that more users care about. Perhaps they start charging less for DP that has fewer built-in plug-ins and starts charging for MOTU plug-ins. There are a thousand ways to go. With the competative landscape you cannot continue doing the same thing over and over again or you will get left behind. Apple learned that lesson, that is why Jobs was brought back. Believe me, as an individual who has purchased MOTU hardware and software I want the company to do well.
I hear what you're saying. However I think it's unfair to paint this solely as the "hip, with-it, young" company, versus a "stodgy, dinosaur" company. I mean it serves the narrative, but it's not altogether fair or accurate.

How do you suggest a MOTU competes with a company with just a couple of employees and a low overhead? Charge less for DP and then fire half the staff? Perhaps the future will be all audio software will be created by small companies made of a few individuals who are also programmers. If any of them grow too big, they will fail as they won't be able to bring in enough revenue to support growth.

I get what you are saying about a `cloud' being over the user base especially because you don't align well with the opensource community. Ok, it is a stigma that isn't going to go away so most of us will just need to let it slide off our backs.
Ahhh, so it's ME that's the problem here. I don't "align well" with the opensource community. Well, I guess you're right when the opensource community seemingly lacks understanding of certain boundaries regarding commercial software. Case in point coming to a site for users of an established DAW that is often misaligned and understood, and saying "Hi... I use one of those opensource DAWs that's aggressively trying to build user base and erode your market share, although one of the things I don't like about it is it doesn't have your DAW's GUI. Please give it to me." :rofl: I'm sorry, but NFW!! :brucelee: Here, let me bend over backwards to take a brand new feature that's a marketplace advantage which is attracting converts to DP, and just HAND IT TO YOU so you can take it on to Reaper? What have you been smoking???

The last thing I will say is that, as an active member of the opensource community for over a decade, I have found the good heavily outweigh the bad apples. Hence, I bristle at the stereotype.
I don't blame you. However, folks like Adam have reinforced the stereotype just a bit. :(

As a quick point of information, the Reaper evaluation box opens everytime an unregistered copy of Reaper starts up. There is a countdown button that starts at a higher increment with each new start so the user has to wait longer to be able to hit the continue button. Also, my good buddy FMeguilez states that Reaper is free multiple times, almost as many as he calls Reaper a toy. :wink:
Does it increment the timer upward each time right away or just after the 30 days have expired? I'm assuming it's the latter. I've never gotten that far. I've tried Reaper myself... and it wasn't my cup of tea. That's not to say I didn't see a number of features that I liked, but overall it's my opinion that DP is still more capable in the areas that matter most to me. YMMV.


DP is a great program. It can do several things Reaper can't and vice-versa. What people don't understand about Reaper is that it has `grown up' very quickly.
I don't dispute that at all. What I have said is part of the reason it is "growing up" quickly is Cuckos is a small company compared to MOTU and they can and do get by with much less revenue. Hence they can undercut other DAWs significantly in price in order to stay in the game until such time as they achieve feature parity and feel "safe." At a certain point, when they have taken enough market share and are "established" we will see if the pricing structure remains.

The development cycle is very fast and the code quality speaks for itself. Simply outstanding. Reaper is a lean, efficient, feature rich application. Maybe people think it is a toy or whatever because they are not used to a product maturing so quickly. They are used to looong development cycles that don't always result in the quality offering users hoped for. Believe it or not, it is completely different with Reaper and it is one of the reasons I use it.
Thanks for that Reaper advertisement. That read like a brochure. But in case you hadn't noticed MOTU has picked up the pace of DP development and made enormous strides in the past few months. There are a slew of new features, many of which you cannot get in Reaper. On top of that it has full OSC support and a free iPhone/iPad remote control app. Not bad for a stodgy, old DAW that's been around for close to 30 years. :)

Last of all, I do agree that the fader buttons are identical and that is a real shame. If it does not change I won't be using the theme. As I stated before, I will not condone piracy in any form.
Well, as you can see I went to some extra effort to prove that point beyond a shadow of a doubt. Personally, you have to understand was that my upset was not so much at the idea that Adam wanted to do it, but rather his somewhat clueless audacity and obliviousness to the context of current events (SOS feature, etc.) that led him to walk into worldwide "DP User Central" and ask to be handed screenshots with which to create a Reaper verson of DP's "Producer" theme.

Many of us here are strong DP advocates and we're just a little sensitive to the sorts of misinformed public maligning that happens out there-- just as you are when it comes to Reaper. I am however, somewhat pleased to learn that Reaper's timeout screen increases the countdown. I won't go into detail, as I too hate piracy, but I imagine it's not all that hard for a sophisticated person to "reset the timer" if they're willing to put up with the inconvenience every 30 days or so.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
IAMLFO
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:31 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by IAMLFO »

FMiguelez wrote:
It's fine with me. We can keep discussing THINGS without resorting to personal attacks.

I don't agree with you either, BTW.
Granted. I know nothing of Reaper. But then, I don't need to.

It clearly is inferior to DP in MANY ways, is it not?
- What can I do with it that I can't with DP?
The only thing I've heard about is latency compensation for external hardware. I don't use external hardware, so I don't care.
So as you can see, I have no reason to even want to try it.

I can understand you don't liking my critique of a product I haven't tried. But YOU, who use both DAWs, can you honestly say Reaper is in the same league as DP or the rest of the DAWs, for that matter? Please be honest here.

I'm the first one to always say that tools are tools and what matters is only the person operating those tools. So I don't know either how I got entangled with this useless discussion :roll:
At the end of the day, no one will know what DAW was used to make the music anyway.
But I don't like having Reaper guys coming in here trying to lift OUR DP themes for THEIR app, and this is how all this mess started, I suppose. That's all.
You are right, the real differentiator is the person using the tools, not the tools themselves. Like that poem `The Touch of the Masters Hand'.

Just so you know where I am coming from, I've used Cubase for about 15 years, Cakewalk for DOS before that. I've used Logic for about 4 years now, DP for just over 2 and Reaper for a couple of months. I can honestly say without any hesitation that Reaper is in the same league as all the other DAWs. When I looked at Reaper around 2 years ago I would not have said that. Reaper has come that far. I think people are not used to the fast development and maturing that Reaper has shown. Certainly it has been much faster than the likes of Cubase or DP. Additionally, Reaper is not as `pretty' as its competitors, at least with the default theme. For my eyes, some of the themes are really good, certainly better than Logic or even Cubase. But that is entirely subjective. So, the graphics might put off someone. However, graphics are not all important. Stability, efficiency and features are. Reaper chalk full of all three. It is easily the most efficient of all the DAWs out there. Hands down. Done the tests myself. It was another reason that I started taking Reaper seriously.

As far as features that one program has that the other doesn't, I gave a list in my first or second post. BenMRX gave a good list too. We both gave areas where DP is stronger than Reaper. Neither of us think Reaper is perfect!

To be perfectly clear, I *never once* said Reaper was better than DP. I simply argued that Reaper is not a toy and that it is not possible to judge the program without having used it. I'll stand by both.

I'll add one or two things Reaper can do that DP can't just off the top of my head.

I can colorize anything and those changes can be at the event, track or project level. This includes not only colors but how translucent I want them to be.

I can change menus to exactly what I want them to be and everything can be assigned a key command.

I can create VI templates and I can use both AU and VST standards.

I can rename Effects so that they are meaningful in the mixer. This means that if I have a send on a track I can rename it to, say, 1/8 note delay instead of the send having the generic name of the plug-in.

While playing, I can hold option and change the volume of a track to audition a new level. If I want to change the level, I let go of the option key and it stays. If I don't want to change it I let go of the button and it snaps back to the original position. This can be done with one track, multiple tracks or an entire folder.

I can create a temporary group of tracks by shift or command clicking on multiple tracks. They will all now react to volume changes, panning, (both relative per track of course) etc. Also, if I need to adjust one of the tracks I can hold shift and while shift is held make adjustments to that one track until I lift the shift key.

I can click on mute or solo and drag down other tracks to mute or solo them too.

There is only one track type in Reaper. It handles Audio, MIDI, Sends, VIs, everything. At face value people balk at it, usually because the concept is so foreign to them, but it is a great way to work. (Subjective, so YMMV.)


I highly recommend you watch Kenny's free video on Reaper navigation. You will find at least 4 things Reaper does that are very useful and not found in DP. Here's the link: http://www.groove3.com/str/reaper-explained.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; scroll down to the Navigation link, it is at the bottom and spend 8 or so minutes watching. Maybe when you are done watching you will see why I an others balk when you call the program a toy. Stranger things have happened! :)

-Kevin
24" 2.4 Ghz iMac, OSX 10.4.10, MOTU 828 MK2, 2 Glyph 250 Gig external drives, DP 5.12, Cubase SX 3, Logic 8, DP 5, Finale 2008, GPO, Strad, Gro, JABB, Reason 4, EWQL Storm Drum, Adrenaline, Symphonic Choirs, Orchestra Gold, All Arturia Synths, Many NI Synths, Atmosphere, RMX, Banshee Talkbox
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by Shooshie »

James Steele wrote:I'm not bashing Reaper here. But my position is that if the Reaper guy wants to copy a DP theme he should have to do it the old fashioned way and do it from scratch in Photoshop by looking at the theme.

I made a conscious decision that I wasn't going to use this board to HELP him. As it is he's already posted that he obtained a copy of DP somehow and is digging into the Producer bundle and using the graphics to copy DP's producer theme for Reaper. Worse than that he's put the theme bundle online for those who don't own DP to access. Whether it's the entire app or just part, I'm pretty sure that putting parts of commercial software online for anyone to download is illegal. Hence I deleted him.

As far as Reaper being $60 for non-commercial use, that's certainly true. However they let you download a fully functioning app and then paying for it is on the HONOR SYSTEM. Henceforth, it is my contention that a good deal of their user base has likely not paid for the app.
As Scott said in another thread, I think the guy was in the clear for just wanting to copy our themes. Not much we can do about that, and as (I think) Michkol said, the irony with our own MoTools theme is kind of biting. BUT… when he posted the internals of DP, he was posting MOTU's property, without having added any of his own value to it in Photoshop. Even though it requires alteration to use in Reaper, just posting the folder of graphic elements is a violation of copyright. I guess it's for MOTU to decide whether or not it's worth pursuing him, but I'm quite happy that you chose to take MOTUNation out of that equation by deleting him and his further efforts to reap our stuff.

Shoosh
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22845
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by James Steele »

Shooshie wrote:As Scott said in another thread, I think the guy was in the clear for just wanting to copy our themes. Not much we can do about that, and as (I think) Michkol said, the irony with our own MoTools theme is kind of biting.
I think Adam's timing was bad. On top of it, however, if he wants to copy the theme's he needs to start from scratch. As I took pains to demonstrate earlier in this thread, he clearly lifted some graphic elements (like the fader caps) wholesale. No modification, no manipulation, just took them. And the thing is, nobody may have been the wiser had he not perhaps been so naive as to come here of all places seeking assistance with his endeavor. Some of us, myself are included, are still smarting a bit from being shoved into the cheap seats in the pages of SOS, and not long afterward Reaper gets a monthly column. So when Adam shows up: "Hi... I'm a Reaper user! DP 7.2's Producer them looks great! Can you DP users post screenshots so I can take one of your new, hot, market differentiating features and tack it onto Reaper for myself and the entire Reaper community?"... Well... I said NO! Build it from scratch... "clean room" style. But no help here.

BUT… when he posted the internals of DP, he was posting MOTU's property, without having added any of his own value to it in Photoshop. Even though it requires alteration to use in Reaper, just posting the folder of graphic elements is a violation of copyright. I guess it's for MOTU to decide whether or not it's worth pursuing him, but I'm quite happy that you chose to take MOTUNation out of that equation by deleting him and his further efforts to reap our stuff.
As I mentioned the fader caps required NO alteration and I showed by showing Adam's own post that he lifted the fader caps directly. I don't know if MOTU needs to pursue him at all, but I think he needed a little bit of education as what is permissible to use and what isn't. It would upset me greatly if we see Andy's beautiful themes that were created specifically for DP lifted in a similar manner without his permission. I've said all along that if Andy chose to sell Reaper skins/themes that's up to him, but his hard work and sweat shouldn't be appropriated unless he gives his permission. We've all made tweaks to Andy's themes, and he's been cool about it, but it might behoove Andy to put a notice with his themes about what sort of use is permissible and what isn't to protect himself.

The larger issue here, and I'll just be honest with you all, is that this board is about DP users and to some extent DP advocacy. The way I see it, DP 7.2 is marking a very exciting turn of events and I see Digital Performer gaining ground in the market place as it makes these improvements-- and deservedly so. This is also a very competitive market. DP's new themes, as we have witnessed, have attracted the interest of a lot of new users as well as old users thinking of returning to the fold. Yes, it's cosmetic, but there are lots of improvements under the hood as well. But we are locked in a bit of a battle for market share, and sometimes I'm going to put on my soldier's helmet and enter the skirmish. That might be something that seems petty to some of you-- like refusing to help Adam out. I have no doubt he thought his endeavor to be innocent enough, but I'm coming from the perspective that if my DAW has some new bling that users of other DAWs covet-- I'm not going to hand it over to them.

That's just my position on it. Fortunately for me, I run this board, so I was in a position where my position mattered. Still, as I said, Adam got what he needed elsewhere, but he can't realistically expect to go to a hardcore DP user site and expect many of us would say "Okay... here you go... hope you like it! Want our other themes too?" :D
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22845
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by James Steele »

No offense, IAMLFO but Adam doesn't post to this board any more either directly or by proxy. He can post whatever he wants to say at the Reaper board. I'm done with it and I'm not going to engage Adam in a debate about it. And regardless of whether he just copied the fader caps as a "test run" or whatever his story is now, this user community wasn't going to help him copy the look and feel of a DP theme. I see that he's doing it on his own, so good for him. Distributing part of the DP app was a bad idea. That's since been rectified, but I'm not interested in hearing any more from Adam here. This is NOT a Reaper user forum.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
IAMLFO
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:31 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by IAMLFO »

James Steele wrote:No offense, IAMLFO but Adam doesn't post to this board any more either directly or by proxy. He can post whatever he wants to say at the Reaper board. I'm done with it and I'm not going to engage Adam in a debate about it. And regardless of whether he just copied the fader caps as a "test run" or whatever his story is now, this user community wasn't going to help him copy the look and feel of a DP theme. I see that he's doing it on his own, so good for him. Distributing part of the DP app was a bad idea. That's since been rectified, but I'm not interested in hearing any more from Adam here. This is NOT a Reaper user forum.
No offense taken, but I cannot for the life of me figure out why you would not want to post his explanation and apology. Yes, you are the owner of the board and your word is law and I respect your position. However, the guy is trying to make amends. Not allowing him to clear things up especially after he has righted the wrong he has done doesn't make sense to me. He did not request any further help, he apologized for making a big stir over an inappropriate request. He doesn't want to debate, he just wants to fix what he broke. I'm baffled...

-Kevin
24" 2.4 Ghz iMac, OSX 10.4.10, MOTU 828 MK2, 2 Glyph 250 Gig external drives, DP 5.12, Cubase SX 3, Logic 8, DP 5, Finale 2008, GPO, Strad, Gro, JABB, Reason 4, EWQL Storm Drum, Adrenaline, Symphonic Choirs, Orchestra Gold, All Arturia Synths, Many NI Synths, Atmosphere, RMX, Banshee Talkbox
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22845
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by James Steele »

IAMLFO wrote:
James Steele wrote:No offense, IAMLFO but Adam doesn't post to this board any more either directly or by proxy. He can post whatever he wants to say at the Reaper board. I'm done with it and I'm not going to engage Adam in a debate about it. And regardless of whether he just copied the fader caps as a "test run" or whatever his story is now, this user community wasn't going to help him copy the look and feel of a DP theme. I see that he's doing it on his own, so good for him. Distributing part of the DP app was a bad idea. That's since been rectified, but I'm not interested in hearing any more from Adam here. This is NOT a Reaper user forum.
No offense taken, but I cannot for the life of me figure out why you would not want to post his explanation and apology. Yes, you are the owner of the board and your word is law and I respect your position. However, the guy is trying to make amends. Not allowing him to clear things up especially after he has righted the wrong he has done doesn't make sense to me....
I read it over there. And I'm tired of the whole issue. He continues to portray himself as the victim. Furthermore he was never banned here for asking for screen captures. He was banned when he posted actual parts of the Digital Performer package (the Producer theme) online for others to download. He says it was just his enthusiasm, but it was not smart. Now he's posting another theme with different fader caps I guess and his previous version with the lifted graphics were just some sort of "test" now? Ummm... okay.

Really, what does Adam care if he's banned at this forum? According to his own post, he uses Logic, Reaper, Pro Tools but has no interest in DP. The ONLY reason he joined this forum and made one post was to ask for screenshots of a DP theme. It's not as if he is going to miss coming here for any reason.

And yes... some of us are protective of DP over here. So what? We use an $800 DAW ($395 competitive crossgrade) that competes in a market with a $60 DAW. Does it make sense for Adam to expect DP users to answer his sole post, which was a call for screenshots of one of our DP themes in order to help him develop a skin for Reaper (a competing DAW) based on it, and be cheerful partners in enhancing Reaper's visual appeal? I mean... c'mon. :D
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
User avatar
James Steele
Site Administrator
Posts: 22845
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego, CA - U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Reaper user ripping off DP's Producer theme?

Post by James Steele »

P.S. I'm locking the thread. Everything that's needed to be said, has been said and it's become more than tedious. It also belongs in the OT area at this point so it's being moved as well.
JamesSteeleProject.com | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter

Mac Studio M1 Max, 64GB/2TB, macOS Sequoia 15.5, DP 11.34, MOTU 828es, MOTU 24Ai, MOTU MIDI Express XT, UAD-2 TB3 Satellite OCTO, Console 1 Mk2, Avid S3, NI Komplete Kontrol S88 Mk2, Red Type B, Millennia HV-3C, Warm Audio WA-2A, AudioScape 76F, Dean guitars, Marshall amps, etc., etc.!
Locked