UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
I was wondering what the difference is between these two versions - is there any audible difference? (counting my pennies these days, and want to know if buying the full version is worth it).
Thanks.
Thanks.
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
- rodger1811
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Bolingbrook, Illinois
- Contact:
Re: UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
If you buy the 1176 you automatically get the SE version from UAD.
Mid 2012 Mac Pro 12 Core 2.4GHz, 24G RAM, OSX 10.8.2, DP 8.01
4x2 TB Hard Drives
APOGEE Symphony
MOTU 2408 mk3
MOTU HD192/Black Lion Modified
MOTU 24I/Ox2
MOTU MIDI Timepiece
Universal Audio UAD-2 Quad x 2
Universal Audio (Entire Plugin Library)
Waves Mercury+ Studio Classics
Tons of other goodies; to many to mention here
4x2 TB Hard Drives
APOGEE Symphony
MOTU 2408 mk3
MOTU HD192/Black Lion Modified
MOTU 24I/Ox2
MOTU MIDI Timepiece
Universal Audio UAD-2 Quad x 2
Universal Audio (Entire Plugin Library)
Waves Mercury+ Studio Classics
Tons of other goodies; to many to mention here
-
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
Re: UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
Thanks - but actually I have the SE version which comes free when buying a UAD card, and wanted to clarify the differences in sound before upgrading to the full version.
MacBook Pro 2021 (M1 Ultra) with 64 gigs RAM. DP 11.23
Re: UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
From the UA website:
"New 1176SE "Special Edition" plug-in uses very little DSP"
"New 1176SE "Special Edition" plug-in uses very little DSP"
Re: UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
The full version will use more resources but it sounds better at more extreme settings. At light settings, it doesn't make a lot of difference. If you use the SE version a lot it's probably worth the cost of the full version. It's going cheap in the June sale.
2018 Mini i7 32G macOS 12.7.6, DP 11.33, Mixbus 10, Logic 10.7.9, Scarlett 18i8, MB Air M2, macOS 14.7.6, DP 11.33, Logic 11
Re: UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
I find that if I use a lot of compression on a bass track (like if the player is all over the place), that the full version does a better job. The SE version seems to be a little distorted. That's the only place I've noticed a difference in audio quality - heavy compression of low frequency material. But, even so, I'll usually grab the 1176 if I have the resources and only use the SE on high track counts. Dunno, maybe it's just a placebo.
Phil
Phil
DP 11.34. 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 15.3/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
Re: UAD 1176 vs UAD 1176SE
From the UA manual:
"The 1176SE is derived from the 1176LN. Its algorithm has been revised in or-
der to provide sonic characteristics similar to the 1176LN but with signifi-
cantly less DSP usage. It is provided to allow “1176LN-like sound” when DSP
resources are limited.
"The 1176SE behavior is practically identical to the 1176LN. Its sound is
nearly identical too, but certain compromises had to be made in order to
squeeze the extra DSP performance that the 1176SE provides. At nominal set-
tings the sonic difference is negligible. At extreme (cranked) settings, nobody
with “golden ears” will say it sounds exactly like the 1176LN, but it still
sounds great and is very usable in most situations."
Also, I believe that the 1176LN is a feedback-style compressor, whereas the 1176SE uses the feedforward scheme. (If this sounds like I know what I'm talking about, it's because I remember reading it in a similar topic to this on the UA board).

Kind regards.
"The 1176SE is derived from the 1176LN. Its algorithm has been revised in or-
der to provide sonic characteristics similar to the 1176LN but with signifi-
cantly less DSP usage. It is provided to allow “1176LN-like sound” when DSP
resources are limited.
"The 1176SE behavior is practically identical to the 1176LN. Its sound is
nearly identical too, but certain compromises had to be made in order to
squeeze the extra DSP performance that the 1176SE provides. At nominal set-
tings the sonic difference is negligible. At extreme (cranked) settings, nobody
with “golden ears” will say it sounds exactly like the 1176LN, but it still
sounds great and is very usable in most situations."
Also, I believe that the 1176LN is a feedback-style compressor, whereas the 1176SE uses the feedforward scheme. (If this sounds like I know what I'm talking about, it's because I remember reading it in a similar topic to this on the UA board).

Kind regards.
Dave Bourke
– ideation –
Mac Pro Quad Xeon 2.66 GHz, 5 Gb, OS X 10.5.8, iMac 24" 2.4 GHz Intel Core Duo, OS X 10.6.2, Mac G4 dual 800 MHz Quicksilver, DP 7.11, PCIe-424/24i, UAD-2 Quad/UAD-1e, PowerCore Firewire.
– ideation –
Mac Pro Quad Xeon 2.66 GHz, 5 Gb, OS X 10.5.8, iMac 24" 2.4 GHz Intel Core Duo, OS X 10.6.2, Mac G4 dual 800 MHz Quicksilver, DP 7.11, PCIe-424/24i, UAD-2 Quad/UAD-1e, PowerCore Firewire.