Tonehammer / Mach V, a good choice?

Discussion of all things related to MOTU's awesome MachFive software sampler.

Moderator: James Steele

Post Reply
echoromeo
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:07 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Tonehammer / Mach V, a good choice?

Post by echoromeo »

Hello,

Two questions/concerns here.

I am a long time DP and Motu user (12+years). I am really in need of a good sampler. Naturally, the Kontakt vs Mach 5 question is an important one, especially considering the price difference. As a DP user, I like the idea of solid Sampler/Sequencer compatibility..although I've read of Mach 5 being resource heavy as compared to Kontakt. Any observations?

Second, I will be using some Tonehammer sounds, which are designed for Kontakt. Has anyone used Tonehammer sounds on Mach 5? How elegant is the Kontakt compatibility?

Thank you very much.
bdr
Posts: 942
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Tonehammer / Mach V, a good choice?

Post by bdr »

I have both and do find M5 to be far more resource heavy. And with K3.5 now using as much RAM as you've got, there's no comparison. Unfortunate,as I far prefer Mach 5's interface and editing for me is far more intuitive.

I have Tonehammer:Barbary and just tried loading it into M5. It played OK but didn't seem to bring across the mod wheel/pitch wheel programming.

HTH
Mac 2.8 8-core, 20 GB RAM, Mac 10.9, DP 8, EWQLSO Platinum Play, Mach V II, Kontakt 5, Superior Drummer, AIR, Absynth 5, Plectrum, CronoX, Albino3, RMV, cup of tea.
Post Reply