Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by FMiguelez »

chaim wrote: You are right about DP's busses. But what about VI's multi outs. If I created a clipping of a VI with some patches loaded and each goes out from it's own output into audio tracks with the VI's inputs - why shouldn't such a set up be automatically activated? How or what could possibly go wrong?
Hmmmmm.... You're right. I've had those issues regarding VIs.

But I think it's solvable. For instance, with Stylus RMX, if I have a clipping that includes all the MIDI assignments (for Stylus' 8 MIDI channels), along with 8 aux tracks and 8 audio tracks, DP DOES recognize the aux and audio tracks and sets them accordingly. I think the issue is with the MIDI assignments. But if I recall correctly, by removing the word "copy" from the MIDI tracks (once they have been dragged into the sequence) solves the problem.
It's something like that. Or clicking in the bundles' tiles... or maybe I deleted the VI track and created a new one. I can almost swear I've worked it out, but I don't remember precisely how :?


At any rate, if there's no easy way to work around this, then yes, I do agree with you: MOTU should fix it.
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by Shooshie »

I'm gonna ask MOTU Claus for the same present I've been asking for since May of 2003:

Please, nothing new. Just make it all work. If it just all worked, all the time, I'd be so happy.
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
kassonica
Posts: 5231
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by kassonica »

Shooshie wrote:I'm gonna ask MOTU Claus for the same present I've been asking for since May of 2003:

Please, nothing new. Just make it all work. If it just all worked, all the time, I'd be so happy.
+1
Creativity, some digital stuff and analogue things that go boom. crackle, bits of wood with strings on them that go twang
Killahurts
Posts: 2232
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: USA

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by Killahurts »

chaim wrote: • when bouncing to disk and import into sequence is selected - give us an option where the bounced track should appear in the sequence - on top or on bottom and...

• option when I BTD again and select import to sequence if the bounced file should create new track (like it does now) or place it self in the same newly created track from the first bounce.

How about giving us the option of replacing the source soundbite/file with the bounced soundbite/file, without creating a new track at all?

Sometimes, all I want to do is consolidate soundbites into a single track where they are, without any plugs or processing.
DP11, 2019 16-Core Mac Pro, OS 14 Sonoma , 64GB RAM. RME HDSPe MADI FX to SSL Alphalink to SSL Matrix console, and multiple digital sub consoles. UAD Quad PCIe. Outboard stuff.
rainmaker
Posts: 456
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by rainmaker »

I think the first thing is stability!!!

Number two... DP has got to have a new GUI. The new GUI in 6 just doesn't cut it for those of us that use this thing day in and day out to make a living. I have been staring at DP 3,4,5 for years with not much complaint in this area, but I have to say that 6 is no good. The faders need to lose the sled they sit in, the blue meters can barely be seen, the pan knobs with that additive led ring is lame and I've never understood those, the pan knob should have one point of light to show where it's pointed, the color scheme, or lack thereof, is in need of a complete overhaul, need an option for the waveforms to be black in the Sequence Editor, etc, etc, etc.... It looks as though the GUI was an afterthought and not completed. Regardless, if I am going to be staring at this program for years more to come... they need to update the GUI QUICKLY! And no, the DarkMod isn't quite what I want either, it goes too far the other way, but it's better than Motu's attempt.

As others have stated, I look at the new Pro Tools GUI and want that badly. It is near perfect in it's beauty, simplicity and form.

Here are a couple more that bug the heck out of me and for the life of me I don't know why they don't fix these items... Version after Version keeps coming out with no change to these annoying items...

1) PLEASE give us the option of having new tracks default with their buss send volumes to off!

2) PLEASE give us the option to select multiple tracks and change their bus sends all at once (both outputs and volumes). Example, select ten tracks and change all of the first send outputs to bus 1. Having to change each one individually is a complete time waster. Yes, I know you can group the send volume knobs, but not the outputs.

3) BETTER THAN THE FIRST TWO, give us the ability to save a channel strip as a default so anytime we create a new track, it would have all those elements assigned already (bus sends, bus levels, inserts, etc...)

4) PLEASE make it so when you have the mixer open as a second window, it resizes properly. Example, when you have the mixer open outside of a consolidated window (a second monitor perhaps), anytime you pop open the Track Selector window, the mixer resizes to fit the Track Selector. But when you close the Track Selector window, the mixer window becomes smaller instead of spreading back out to fit the space.

5) PLEASE change the rewind button functionality in DP so as you keep hitting rewind, it keeps rewinding faster and faster. Rewinding and Fast Forwarding in DP are painfully SLOW if you use the built in transport. This would also need to apply to control surfaces so as you hit their transport buttons, it would work the same way.

6) Did I mention stability?
Last edited by rainmaker on Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 10394
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by HCMarkus »

Oooh... I like #3! (also #6)
superjeezus
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 7:40 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by superjeezus »

Shooshie wrote:I'm gonna ask MOTU Claus for the same present I've been asking for since May of 2003:

Please, nothing new. Just make it all work. If it just all worked, all the time, I'd be so happy.
+999

I hate to beat this same old horse, but I have spent the last couple days refreshing my Logic know-how. I need an app that makes sense CPU-wise and is at least somewhat stable. Logic isn't the end-all in that department, I know, but it is working so much better than DP right now for me.

I am very disappointed with 6.02. My first couple of projects in 6.02 had less efficient CPU usage and crashed more than 6.01. On two different systems--one a fresh install. And, I have been using only one audio driver: the MOTU PCI-424 with two 2408mkIII's attached.

A few oddities I can handle (text lablels a bit screwy, bundle channels showing up a bit wierd, or a few gui issues, etc.). But on a tight overnight deadline, I can't afford to be restarting DP or the whole computer over and over.

Sorry for the rant. I really, really want MOTU to get DP right. I started on Performer back in the day, and the workflow just sits right with me. But right now DP isn't cutting it well enough for me to feel good about using it.

I'm one step closer to turning from DP completely and never coming back. Right now, the only thing keeping me from uninstalling it completely are the video/marker/find tempo features.

The next version will need to be rock solid for me to rely on it for the bread and butter.
Late 2008 MacPro 2.8 8-core, 2408mkIII, 10.6.2, Lots of RAM and HD, DP7.1
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26279
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

rainmaker wrote:I think the first thing is stability!!!

Number two... DP has got to have a new GUI.
DP is pretty stable; it reliably crashes on certain VIs every time. :lol:

The GUI is a big project and no doubt there are many differing opinions on just how it should be implemented. The key there (IMO) is OPTIONS; we should be able to essentially decide more visual aspects for ourselves. The Control Panel window new features are a start. Fun, but I'd rather have more control over text v background and font sizes.

Obviously an app that doesn't crash often and functions as planned (especially when you need it to) is critical. I agree - restarting every few minutes gets old fast! So does waiting for VIs and plugins to "catchup" (or for DP to capitulate.)
2013 Mac Pro 2TB/32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; Track 16; DP 12; Finale 28

LinkTree (events & peformances)
Instagram
Facebook

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
chaim
Posts: 486
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NY

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by chaim »

rainmaker wrote:I think the first thing is stability!!!

Number two... DP has got to have a new GUI. The new GUI in 6 just doesn't cut it for those of us that use this thing day in and day out to make a living. I have been staring at DP 3,4,5 for years with not much complaint in this area, but I have to say that 6 is no good. The faders need to lose the sled they sit in, the blue meters can barely be seen, the color scheme, or lack thereof, is in need of a complete overhaul. It looks as though the GUI was an afterthought and not completed. Regardless, if I am going to be staring at this program for years more to come... they need to update the GUI quickly.

As others have stated, I look at the new Pro Tools GUI and want that badly. It is near perfect in it's beauty, simplicity and form.

Here are a couple more that bug the heck out of me and for the life of me I don't know why they don't fix these items... Version after Version keeps coming out with no change to these annoying items...

1) PLEASE give us the option of having new tracks default with their buss send volumes to off!

2) PLEASE give us the option to select multiple tracks and change their bus sends all at once (both outputs and volumes). Example, select ten tracks and change all of the first send outputs to bus 1. Having to change each one individually is a complete time waster. Yes, I know you can group the send volume knobs, but not the outputs.

3) BETTER THAN THE FIRST TWO, give us the ability to save a channel strip as a default so anytime we create a new track, it would have all those elements assigned already (bus sends, bus levels, inserts, etc...)

4) PLEASE make it so when you have the mixer open as a second window, it resizes properly. Example, when you have the mixer open outside of a consolidated window (a second monitor perhaps), anytime you pop open the Track Selector window, the mixer resizes to fit the Track Selector. But when you close the Track Selector window, the mixer window becomes smaller instead of spreading back out to fit the space.

5) PLEASE change the rewind button functionality in DP so as you keep hitting rewind, it keeps rewinding faster and faster. Rewinding and Fast Forwarding in DP are painfully SLOW if you use the built in transport. This would also need to apply to control surfaces so as you hit their transport buttons, it would work the same way.

6) Did I mention stability?
I'll vote for #2 and 3.
Mac Pro 2X quad core 2.26 Ghz, 22 GB RAM, OS 10.8.4 | DP 8.05 | 2408MKII

Beta Tester for Toontrack
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by FMiguelez »

.

I think MOTU has been playing catch-up with the rest of the DAWs.

I agree they should concentrate on cleaning up ALL the bugs before implementing more features. The thing is that they have to hurry, because they are behind one cycle. IOW, if they get rid of all the bugs in the next version (say DP 6.3), they would have to immediately start thinking about new features for DP 6.5. Otherwise, they will never lead with innovation... they will keep playing catch-up.

Michael... that is not you... IS IT????

Whoaaaa! Now, THAT's what I call a 70's look :)
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
MIDI Life Crisis
Posts: 26279
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by MIDI Life Crisis »

FMiguelez wrote:

Michael... that is not you... IS IT????

Whoaaaa! Now, THAT's what I call a 70's look :)
About 1971 in my "Hendrix" period... :)
2013 Mac Pro 2TB/32GB RAM

OSX 10.14.6; Track 16; DP 12; Finale 28

LinkTree (events & peformances)
Instagram
Facebook

MIDI LIFE CRISIS
pacquito
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by pacquito »

- improved cpu efficiency with vi's
- visible buffer size readout and selection

And another suggestion I saw someone talk about on here one time - an FX/VI dock of some sort. I think this is a great idea and would make getting to the plugins faster and deal with the workflow impedance of having to constantly be opening and closing windows. You could hit a keyboard shortcut and a dock showing all your fx and vi's comes up, scroll through with arrow keys and hit enter for quick selection without the mouse. To lessen the opening and closing of individual windows there could be some sort of fx/vi shell (like reason's screen) so that you could stack the one's you want showing in one window (I know, they're all different sizes), which you could then open and close, making it easier to quickly view and change parameters of several fx or vi plugins at once.
User avatar
dpdan
Posts: 763
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Midwest
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by dpdan »

chaim....
with regard to number 4 on your list...
try unchecking Auto Resize in the mixer's mini menu.
or whatever we call it now :roll:

Dan
Image
chaim
Posts: 486
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NY

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by chaim »

DpDan, you mean rainmaker, not me.
Mac Pro 2X quad core 2.26 Ghz, 22 GB RAM, OS 10.8.4 | DP 8.05 | 2408MKII

Beta Tester for Toontrack
User avatar
dpdan
Posts: 763
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Midwest
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for DP 6.0.3

Post by dpdan »

chaim wrote:DpDan, you mean rainmaker, not me.
sorry about that chief,... correct
I was aiming my suggestion at rainmaker :)

Thanks
Dan
Post Reply