Survey - Buffer Size

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
User avatar
grimepoch
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NC
Contact:

Survey - Buffer Size

Post by grimepoch »

Just out of curiosity,

CPU: Dual 1.8 Ghz G5
Hardware: MOTU 896 & Built-In Optical TOSLINK

Recording: 128
Mastering: 256
[MacPro-4x2.66/7G/OSX10.5.2 - 2x896HD - ADA8000 - Lucid Genx6 - DP5.13 - Logic 8.02 - 2xUAD1e - ExpressXT - Mach5 - MX4 - Korg LegD - impOSCar - Battery3 - uTonic - Rapture - DimPro - Vanguard - Reaktor5 - Absynth4 - FM8 - Pro53 - Vokator - Waldorf Ed - Addictive Drums - Melodyne - Ultra Analog - Zebra2 - WaveArts - - Altiverb - Etc. ]
[Virus TI - Virus B - Waldorf Q - Waldorf uwXT - Supernova II - Nord Rack 3 - JP8080 - XV5080 - Fantom X7 - Triton Rack - Pro/cussion]
FM
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by FM »

cpu: dual 867 mac
apogee rosetta AD - using optical in
motu 2408 mk3

512 - tracking and mixing

FM

FM can end stress, tension and reduce belly fat.
User avatar
qo
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by qo »

Recording: 128 - 256
Mixing: 512 - 1024

Recording range depends on how many other tracks have already been recorded, and whether or not the artist needs to hear all of them. I normally start out with 128. With a few projects, where the number of tracks got out of hand, we had to decide on unassigning tracks, disabling plugins, etc, while tracking or increasing buffer. Some people just want to hear everything while overdubbing and don't mind the additional latency. Others choose low latency over being able to hear all previously recorded parts.

With mixing, this depends on plugins. Some projects being very light on plugs and other clients wanting to use seemingly every plugin available.

Nice topic!

EDIT: Opps, 2.7 G5, Apogee firewire-based converters.

<small>[ August 03, 2005, 02:38 PM: Message edited by: qo ]</small>
User avatar
maintiger
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Whittier, CA USA
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by maintiger »

recording, 256, 512

mixing 1024
Xavier Calvera
DP 6 dual G5 2.0- 828mkii-
apogee rosetta - Mach Five, Atmosphere, Stylus, Garritan, Soundtrack,
more soft synths...
check out my latest DP project at www.theorishasarecoming.com more on www.lordtiger.com
chrispick
Posts: 3287
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by chrispick »

Recording: 128 - 256

Mixing: 1024

Gear specs below.
aplanchard
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: New York City

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by aplanchard »

Recording 128; mixing -- whatever I can get away with.
thermos
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by thermos »

Always 1024 for everything.
Splinter
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by Splinter »

Recording/Mixing - 1024 + low latency monitoring on PCI-424 card, unless I'm tracking VIs and then I change the buffer to 128 or 256. I just have to be careful either to not use Waves plugs during the tracking phase or to change back to 1024 and play before I close and save or I lose all my settings. I can't believe Waves refuses to fix this bug! How much did I pay for these. Lame.
MacBook Pro Quad 2.4GHz i7 • 10.12 • 16G RAM • DP 9 • MOTU 896HD Hybrid, Apogee Duet, & MOTU Micro Lite MIDI interface • Waves Platinum, Studio Classics Collection, Abbey Road, etc... • Fabfilter Pro-Q2 • Soundtoys FX • IK Amplitube 3, Ampeg, and TRacks 3 • Altiverb 7 • Slate Digital Everything Bundle • Stylus RMX • Komplete 10 • SampleTank 3 • Arturia V Collection • M-Audio Axiom 49
User avatar
Timeline
Posts: 4910
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Fort Atkinson Hebron, Wisconsin...
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by Timeline »

Not sure you can get the result this thread is looking for without referencing track count and SR used. The computer CPU speed will also make a difference.

@96K when I do live rhythm, I start at 512 /512 when recording 12 -19 tracks. If recording a single track I can reduce buffers to offset delays.

Mixing has other dependancies as well. Large audio sessions over 40 tracks @ 96K require big buffers so for stability & sound I generally use 1024 disk 1024 voice

For lessor tracks or lower sample rates you can easily use less
for instance by starting out 512 512 I think most issues like disk calls will become quite apparent in the sound as disk access increases. Plugs also effect the buffer needs.

I think you need to ask:

SR & BR:
Disk buffers:
Voice Buffers:
IO buffers:
Multipal IO buffers:
Computer's CPU speed & number:

<small>[ August 03, 2005, 09:04 PM: Message edited by: Timeline ]</small>
2009 Intel 12 core 3.46, 64GB, OSX.10.14.6, Mojave, DP11, MTPAV, Key-station 49,(2) RME FF800,
DA-3000 DSF-5.6mhz, Mackie Control. Hofa DDP Pro, FB@ http://www.facebook.com/garybrandt2
User avatar
grimepoch
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by grimepoch »

I did ask for CPU speed :) I agree with you that all that other information is important, I guess I just wanted a general description. For instance, running about 20 tracks at 128 was causing spikes in CPU (about 5 VI's as well), and now I feel comfortable with cranking that up to 256 or 512, since a lot of other people are running with that as well.

I think the biggest fear I typically have is that I am doing something stupid and not getting the most out of my setup.
[MacPro-4x2.66/7G/OSX10.5.2 - 2x896HD - ADA8000 - Lucid Genx6 - DP5.13 - Logic 8.02 - 2xUAD1e - ExpressXT - Mach5 - MX4 - Korg LegD - impOSCar - Battery3 - uTonic - Rapture - DimPro - Vanguard - Reaktor5 - Absynth4 - FM8 - Pro53 - Vokator - Waldorf Ed - Addictive Drums - Melodyne - Ultra Analog - Zebra2 - WaveArts - - Altiverb - Etc. ]
[Virus TI - Virus B - Waldorf Q - Waldorf uwXT - Supernova II - Nord Rack 3 - JP8080 - XV5080 - Fantom X7 - Triton Rack - Pro/cussion]
fokof
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by fokof »

if the 2048 and + would be available , that would be it......
Always 1024 , thanx to Cue mix.....
User avatar
grimepoch
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by grimepoch »

I stay away from the cuemix stuff, which I am assuming you mean the zero latency monitoring. I ALWAYS listen to the audio patched through the computer. At least with the 896, when I monitor an input, it's an analog passthrough I believe. Because, when I record it, and then play it, it sounds different. This is HIGHLY annoying when you've been tweaking actual hardware outside the box.

So, instead, by monitoring through the software, you hear EXACTLY what is going to be recorded, and so that part is done. This saves me LOTS of time. Right now I run 18 inputs on the 896 (2 AES and 8 ADAT In).
[MacPro-4x2.66/7G/OSX10.5.2 - 2x896HD - ADA8000 - Lucid Genx6 - DP5.13 - Logic 8.02 - 2xUAD1e - ExpressXT - Mach5 - MX4 - Korg LegD - impOSCar - Battery3 - uTonic - Rapture - DimPro - Vanguard - Reaktor5 - Absynth4 - FM8 - Pro53 - Vokator - Waldorf Ed - Addictive Drums - Melodyne - Ultra Analog - Zebra2 - WaveArts - - Altiverb - Etc. ]
[Virus TI - Virus B - Waldorf Q - Waldorf uwXT - Supernova II - Nord Rack 3 - JP8080 - XV5080 - Fantom X7 - Triton Rack - Pro/cussion]
waddo
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: japan
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by waddo »

i love a big buffer. I like chinese buffer best. The problem I find is I always eat too much at a good buffer.

And where do u geys get such cheap buffer??? I mean 512? Its at least 16.95 where I live.
User avatar
grimepoch
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NC
Contact:

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by grimepoch »

Hahah :) Not all Buffer are same, some buffer have big selection and food good, others have two dishes and flies. For 128 you get flies. :)
[MacPro-4x2.66/7G/OSX10.5.2 - 2x896HD - ADA8000 - Lucid Genx6 - DP5.13 - Logic 8.02 - 2xUAD1e - ExpressXT - Mach5 - MX4 - Korg LegD - impOSCar - Battery3 - uTonic - Rapture - DimPro - Vanguard - Reaktor5 - Absynth4 - FM8 - Pro53 - Vokator - Waldorf Ed - Addictive Drums - Melodyne - Ultra Analog - Zebra2 - WaveArts - - Altiverb - Etc. ]
[Virus TI - Virus B - Waldorf Q - Waldorf uwXT - Supernova II - Nord Rack 3 - JP8080 - XV5080 - Fantom X7 - Triton Rack - Pro/cussion]
danes
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: Survey - Buffer Size

Post by danes »

Recording 256/512
Mixing 512, sometimes 1024 :D
G5 1,8Ghz|OSX 10.3.9|DP 5.1|Kontakt|Reaktor|Reason|Waves Diamond 5
Post Reply