Is Aftertouch Critical in Playing VI Sounds?

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
DMac
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:16 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Is Aftertouch Critical in Playing VI Sounds?

Post by DMac »

...I just picked up a new controller keyboard for use with with DP. But horror of horrors, I just realized that it doesn't have aftertouch. I'm a pianist first and foremost, so touch is everything to me and 88-key controllers with hammer action don't seem to have aftertouch (after I did some looking at least not in my price range). Though it appears that organ style keyboards do.

Is this something that will be critical in playing VI instrument libraries, is aftertouch a big part of crafting the sound? The keyboard is velocity sensitive (it's the Kawai MP5 in case you're interested, best touch of any on display at good old Sam Ash).

I suppose I can always hook up my Yamaha SY85, but that would be a mess.

Thanks,

Dave
User avatar
bkshepard
Posts: 1094
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Setúbal, Portugal
Contact:

Post by bkshepard »

Yeah, many (most?) of the VIs use aftertouch to impart some sonic modification to their sounds.
-Brian

Mac M1 Ultra 20-core, OS 14.6.1, 128 GB RAM, DP 11.3.2, UA Apollo x6
jstaczek
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by jstaczek »

Depends on the VI, but almost every VI I've seen allows you to map params to any continuous controller. In most cases, polyphonic aftertouch is too difficult to control anyway, so you only care about monophonic a/t. I've found that plugging in an expression pedal is a much more intuitive way to control that.

I'm a piano and organ player and aftertouch is just plain weird. My B-3 doesn't have it and neither does the Steinway. The MP5 has a killer action--you can't go wrong.
Jason Staczek
www.chromasound.net
Dual 2.5G G5, 6.5G RAM, DP 5.13, OS 10.4.11
MBP 17", 3G RAM, DP 5.13, OS 10.4.11
Pro Tools HD2 Accel, 828mkII, FastLane, Logic 8
User avatar
spitfire31
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:11 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sweden

Re: Is Aftertouch Critical in Playing VI Sounds?

Post by spitfire31 »

DMac wrote: 88-key controllers with hammer action don't seem to have aftertouch
While not a dedicated controller, the 88 key Yamaha S90 ES has aftertouch. The (fairly new and rather cheap) Studiologic VMK plus series also has AT.

www.studiologic.net/VMK-188plus.html

The Studiologic VMK is also available in a 76 key size, otherwise identical.

Best,

Joey
If it were easy, anybody could do it.
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 10377
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Post by HCMarkus »

If you can afford it, keep the 88 key for your piano and Rhodes work, and pick up a decent synth-action keyboard with aftertouch. For organ and synth work, the light keys make all the difference (just like the nice weighted keys make playing piano sounds a lot more fun) and the aftertouch is an intuitive way to add vibrato to leads and wind emulations. Assuming your current axe has the traditional mod and pitch wheels, consider one of the Roland USB controller keyboards, so you get the cool Roland paddle, which is my fave bender for lead guitar emulations. The Rolands have aftertouch and lots of faders and a cross-fader, too. About $300.
User avatar
daniel.sneed
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: France
Contact:

Post by daniel.sneed »

Studiologic VMK+ is a really fine piano touch with aftertouch.

But I agree with Markus : perhaps you'll need a lighter touch for some sounds.
Novation keys are fine for this. Musical feel IMHO and, of course, aftertouch and keyboard split. I would'nt part from my X-Station at any price.

If you go out for gigs, you'll reconsider carrying your full hammer keys more than once. Your back will thank you !
dAn Shakin' all over! :unicorn:
DP11.34, OS12.7.6, MacBookPro-i7
Falcon, Kontakt, Ozone, RX, Unisum, Michelangelo, Sparkverb
Waldorf Iridium & STVC & Blofeld, Kemper Profiler Stage, EWIusb, Mixface
JBL4326+4312sub, Behringer X32rack
Many mandolins, banjos, guitars, flutes, melodions, xylos, kalimbas...
DMac
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:16 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by DMac »

...thanks for all the advice. The Studiologic VMK+ would definitely have been my first choice based on all the reviews I've been reading but no one stocks it anywhere :cry: It's half the price of the Korg.

But based on all your comments, I think I will keep the Korg as my main keyboard, jstaczek is right, it does have great action, plus faders and knobs if I ever want to automate a few things. I'll use my Yamaha in the meantime as an expressive controller for things that require it and look at the Roland paddle controllers in the future.

I'm just kind of stuck with what is stocked in the stores nearby since there's no way I'll buy a keyboard for touch without trying it (though I'm really tempted with the VMK).

Thanks again.
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

I've never liked aftertouch, though I use it from time to time. I prefer to use a pedal unit, so I reprogram my sounds to use the pedals instead of aftertouch. Just my preference. Anyway, to answer your question: no. Aftertouch is not necessary, but it's often convenient.

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
David Polich
Posts: 4839
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by David Polich »

Aftertouch is not always used in factory programmed patches and for good reason. Anyone with a "harder" playing style can trigger aftertouch without necessarily wanting to do so. This results in users thinking something is "wrong" with the sound. As in "why does my Rhodes patch sound so wiggly when I hit the keys harder?"

I'm with Shooshie, I actually don't like aftertouch as a modulation source, and for my own programming needs I leave it out, preferring a ribbon controller, wheels, or expression pedals.
User avatar
mhschmieder
Posts: 11386
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Annandale VA

Post by mhschmieder »

We all seem to concur on this one :-).

Unfortunately, ribbon controllers aren't as common as I would like them to be. Some synths have them, but most don't. And precious few controllers have them -- though some do have very useful XY-pads.

I have the Studiologic VMK188plus, and I can tell you from running MIDI diagnostics tools that it is not very smooth and complete on the aftertouch score. I think this is because aftertouch is very difficult to control or to measure on a weighted action keybed.

As Dave and others said, aftertouch is not all that commonly implemented as a modulation source -- although some synths go hog wild in using it for everything.

I don't mind that it's on my VMK as I can shut it off. I do generally find weighted action easier for almost anything other than organ, but that's because I was brought up on acoustic piano. I get a lot of pain when playing synth keybeds.

But not all synth keybeds are created equal -- and this is ESPECIALLY true of aftertouch control. Most don't have it, period. And most of the rest implement it poorly.

There is general agreement in the industry, that there are only two fully trustworthy implementations of aftertouch (there are a few more recent improvements from some other vendors, including Roland, but I don't remember well enough which units are the exceptions to feel confident listing them here).

In the synth department, anything from Dave Smith Instruments will give you the smoothest aftertouch of anything available, as well as semi-weighted action that has a soft landing and enough heft to prevent wrist and finger pain for those more accustomed to pianos and weughted actions.

In the controller department, Novation is the go-to brand -- but stay away from their low end models (I forget the names, as they recently refurbished most of their lineup), as they don't use semi-weighted action and also either don't implement aftertouch or don't implement it properly.

Proper aftertouch implementation means that every value from 1 to 127 can be triggered. Most equipment can't, and some are so coarse they they only report one value out of every 24 to 33 steps! Luckily, this can be measured using free software MIDI monitoring tools.

But I agree that there are better ways to control modulation than aftertouch. I do like to use it on certain types of sounds though, after initial velocity, for expression. I just don't want to accidentally trigger it.

Kurzweil makes a standalone ribbon controller, which I once owned and which is as wide as a 37-key controller. I think it is only compatible with their keyboards, and it takes a telephone-style terminator jack. Dopefer also makes one, but their stuff is expensive in the USA, comes as kits that aren't always trivial to put together, and there are varying reports on reliability.

Korg has a new nano-series of controllers for under $50 each, which were announced recently but may not be to market yet. One is keys-only, another is knobs/sliders-only, and the third is sort of a linearly-arranged version of the padKontrol (with XY-pad; similar to a ribbon controller).

Note also with ribbon controllers that, aside from the multi-zone approach that Kurzweil took with their extra-long one, can sometimes be one dimensional, two dimensional, or even three dimensional. Most are x-axis only sensitivity; some add z-axis pressure sensitivity. For all I know, there are even some that add y-axis vertical back-and-forth sensitivity (similar to an XY-pad from Korg or Roland).
iMac 27" 2017 Quad-Core Intel i5 (3.8 GHz, 64 GB), OSX 13.7.1, MOTU DP 11.34, SpectraLayers 11
RME Babyface Pro FS, Radial JDV Mk5, Hammond XK-4, Moog Voyager

Eugenio Upright, 60th Anniversary P-Bass, USA Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BBP35
Select Strat, 70th Anniversary Esquire, Johnny Marr Jaguar, 57 LP, Danelectro 12
Eastman T486RB, T64/V, Ibanez PM2, D'angelico Deluxe SS Bari, EXL1
Guild Bari, 1512 12-string, M20, Martin OM28VTS, Larivee 0040MH
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 10377
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Post by HCMarkus »

David Polich wrote:Aftertouch is not always used in factory programmed patches and for good reason. Anyone with a "harder" playing style can trigger aftertouch without necessarily wanting to do so. This results in users thinking something is "wrong" with the sound. As in "why does my Rhodes patch sound so wiggly when I hit the keys harder?"

I'm with Shooshie, I actually don't like aftertouch as a modulation source, and for my own programming needs I leave it out, preferring a ribbon controller, wheels, or expression pedals.
Since my feet and left hand are typically occupied handling other tasks, like pitch bend and volume, I really like aftertough vibrato. However, I always thought keyboard manufacturers would do well to implement a ramp generator into aftertough triggering... a slight ramp into aftertouch would prevent the wiggles David references, and a slight ramp on release would avoid the "My Vibrato Suddenly Ceased" effect when playing patches with longer release times. Hey Dave... pass this idea along to Yamaha, would you?
DMac
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:16 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by DMac »

...thanks for all the info, mhsch, I'm definitely bookmarking this for future reference. And wow! I went to the Dave Smith Instruments site and listened to the Prophet 8 videos. My goodness, that was the first time since I've been looking into this VI world that I've heard a synth that I really, really liked! Full, phat (as they say), and evolving. Man, I'm saving up my pennies for the next 10 years to get one a them :D
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

Come to think of it, I have two ribbon controllers, and I love 'em to death. The small one is about 3.5" long, and the large one is about 22" long. They both have their uses, and for the things you can do with each, there is simply no substitute. These things are wonderful. I reprogram some of my sounds to respond to them, or else I program the ribbon to send something useful to a certain VI and save it into a program on the Kurzweil 2600. (Dave Polich: do you ever play a tune on a ribbon using two hands? :D)

Gotta say it; these Kurzweil 2600's are darned good machines. Mine has an 88 key Fatar in it, and I absolutely love playing on it. Completely programmable as to touch, controllers, and so on. Responds to 64, 65, and 67. (or is sostenuto CC66?) Anyway, it will do all three pedals on a piano, and I often use them when I'm just playing piano.

Anyway... I guess this has gone beyond aftertouch, but yes... I prefer other controllers to aftertouch, but I'll use it when I need to.

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
David Polich
Posts: 4839
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by David Polich »

HCMarkus wrote:
David Polich wrote:Aftertouch is not always used in factory programmed patches and for good reason. Anyone with a "harder" playing style can trigger aftertouch without necessarily wanting to do so. This results in users thinking something is "wrong" with the sound. As in "why does my Rhodes patch sound so wiggly when I hit the keys harder?"

I'm with Shooshie, I actually don't like aftertouch as a modulation source, and for my own programming needs I leave it out, preferring a ribbon controller, wheels, or expression pedals.
Since my feet and left hand are typically occupied handling other tasks, like pitch bend and volume, I really like aftertough vibrato. However, I always thought keyboard manufacturers would do well to implement a ramp generator into aftertough triggering... a slight ramp into aftertouch would prevent the wiggles David references, and a slight ramp on release would avoid the "My Vibrato Suddenly Ceased" effect when playing patches with longer release times. Hey Dave... pass this idea along to Yamaha, would you?
Good idea - will do.
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 10377
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Post by HCMarkus »

David Polich wrote:
HCMarkus wrote:
David Polich wrote:Aftertouch is not always used in factory programmed patches and for good reason. Anyone with a "harder" playing style can trigger aftertouch without necessarily wanting to do so. This results in users thinking something is "wrong" with the sound. As in "why does my Rhodes patch sound so wiggly when I hit the keys harder?"

I'm with Shooshie, I actually don't like aftertouch as a modulation source, and for my own programming needs I leave it out, preferring a ribbon controller, wheels, or expression pedals.
Since my feet and left hand are typically occupied handling other tasks, like pitch bend and volume, I really like aftertough vibrato. However, I always thought keyboard manufacturers would do well to implement a ramp generator into aftertough triggering... a slight ramp into aftertouch would prevent the wiggles David references, and a slight ramp on release would avoid the "My Vibrato Suddenly Ceased" effect when playing patches with longer release times. Hey Dave... pass this idea along to Yamaha, would you?
Good idea - will do.
Cool! Thanks.
Post Reply