Waves is truly NUTS!

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
MegaDPuser
Posts: 276
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:46 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by MegaDPuser »

I'm confused about the "what can replace Enigma, Doppler, etc." type discussion. I've been using Waves Gold Native for many years. The processors are as good as anything out there (but not better; see Sonalksis), but the effects...pretty mediocre in comparison to indie offerings. PSP's delays blow Waves out of the water for both sound quality and flexibility, especially MD608. Fabfilter, Soundtoys, AudioDamage and maybe PSP Nitro have smoother and more interesting and usable characteristics than their equivalent Waves effects and are much cheaper. Throw in a plug or two from Camel Audio to the above, and you've got a massive arsenal of sound mangling at your disposal without ever opening up waves. I do like Waves' processors - C4, L1, RenComp, etc. - but for effects, I don't see why anyone'd use Waves unless it's just a cost and already-own-Waves thing.
iMac, 5.11 / 10.4.9
bongo_x
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Post by bongo_x »

MegaDPuser wrote:I'm confused about the "what can replace Enigma, Doppler, etc." type discussion. I've been using Waves Gold Native for many years. The processors are as good as anything out there (but not better; see Sonalksis), but the effects...pretty mediocre in comparison to indie offerings. PSP's delays blow Waves out of the water for both sound quality and flexibility, especially MD608. Fabfilter, Soundtoys, AudioDamage and maybe PSP Nitro have smoother and more interesting and usable characteristics than their equivalent Waves effects and are much cheaper. Throw in a plug or two from Camel Audio to the above, and you've got a massive arsenal of sound mangling at your disposal without ever opening up waves. I do like Waves' processors - C4, L1, RenComp, etc. - but for effects, I don't see why anyone'd use Waves unless it's just a cost and already-own-Waves thing.
agreed 100%. Waves effects are pretty basic and not that special. There are so many more interesting plugins for filters, delays, etc. that I wouldn't even know where to start. Actually the ones you named are a great start. First just go buy everything FabFilter makes.

bb
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

I've yet to see anything that replaces the C4 and the Linear Phase Multi-Band (C-5). Also, I think the L1, L2, and L3 are unbeatable, but the L3 Multi-Maximizer is simply a new paradigm. Most people don't even know it exists, and of those who do, maybe 1 in 1000 know how it works or what makes it special. Fantastic plugin.

So, as much as I dislike the company, these plugins ensure that I'll be with them for some time to come.

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
pcm
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: woodstock, ny

Post by pcm »

The C4 is in daily use here as well. I also have the L316, but use the L2 most of the time anyway. The API 2500 is a must have for me, as well as the Neve EQs. Fact is, they make a lot of stuff that I must have. :-)
HeadMaster
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:40 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by HeadMaster »

Shooshie wrote:I've yet to see anything that replaces the C4 and the Linear Phase Multi-Band (C-5). Also, I think the L1, L2, and L3 are unbeatable, but the L3 Multi-Maximizer is simply a new paradigm. Most people don't even know it exists, and of those who do, maybe 1 in 1000 know how it works or what makes it special. Fantastic plugin.

So, as much as I dislike the company, these plugins ensure that I'll be with them for some time to come.

Shooshie
I am waiting for this babe to arrive, I think thats gonna be a nice addition in my waves free zone.

http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/multilimit.jpg

. . .
HM
Macbook 2.16
OS-X 10.4.11
DP 5.13

Volentary promotion for free stuff (UB) that you just have to have
Linplug: Alpha Free
Big Tick: Cheeze Machine, Ticky Clav (Apulsoft Mac Ports)
U-HE: Triple Cheese
Lernvall Audio: LAConvolver (IR player)
Yohng: W1 Limiter (L1 "clone")
Sonalksis: FreeG (Advanced Fader/Gain/Meter)
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

HeadMaster wrote:
Shooshie wrote:I've yet to see anything that replaces the C4 and the Linear Phase Multi-Band (C-5). Also, I think the L1, L2, and L3 are unbeatable, but the L3 Multi-Maximizer is simply a new paradigm. Most people don't even know it exists, and of those who do, maybe 1 in 1000 know how it works or what makes it special. Fantastic plugin.

So, as much as I dislike the company, these plugins ensure that I'll be with them for some time to come.

Shooshie
I am waiting for this babe to arrive, I think thats gonna be a nice addition in my waves free zone.

http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/multilimit.jpg

. . .
HM
Do you know how it works? It looks interesting. Is it processing each band independently and limiting them as separate bands? Or does it add them together and prioritize them as they are fed to a single limiter? (the latter is more-or-less the way the L3 works) Is it Phase Accurate? Just curious as to how it compares with the L3. I know it has one very nice feature: it's not made by Waves! :D

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

pcm wrote:The C4 is in daily use here as well. I also have the L316, but use the L2 most of the time anyway. The API 2500 is a must have for me, as well as the Neve EQs. Fact is, they make a lot of stuff that I must have. :-)

PCM, if you like the C4, and I know you do, then you really should try the Linear Phase Multi-Band processor. It should be called the C5. It's the C4 with an extra band, plus it's got extra capabilities, like auto-leveling and linear phase accuracy. You probably know about it, but I was just wondering why you'd be using the C4 and not the C5.

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
HeadMaster
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:40 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by HeadMaster »

Shooshie wrote:
HeadMaster wrote:
Shooshie wrote:I've yet to see anything that replaces the C4 and the Linear Phase Multi-Band (C-5). Also, I think the L1, L2, and L3 are unbeatable, but the L3 Multi-Maximizer is simply a new paradigm. Most people don't even know it exists, and of those who do, maybe 1 in 1000 know how it works or what makes it special. Fantastic plugin.

So, as much as I dislike the company, these plugins ensure that I'll be with them for some time to come.

Shooshie
I am waiting for this babe to arrive, I think thats gonna be a nice addition in my waves free zone.

http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/multilimit.jpg

. . .
HM
Do you know how it works? It looks interesting. Is it processing each band independently and limiting them as separate bands? Or does it add them together and prioritize them as they are fed to a single limiter? (the latter is more-or-less the way the L3 works) Is it Phase Accurate? Just curious as to how it compares with the L3. I know it has one very nice feature: it's not made by Waves! :D

Shooshie
This is what I could find online about that babe,

"MultiLimit - Multiband Mastering Limiter
A superior processor for the most demanding mastering environment, with 5 independent frequency bands separated by linear phase crossovers providing eq and dynamics functionality, proprietary true analogue quality clip/smoothing, program maximizing limiter, dither, extensive frequency analysis features and K-metering. "

. . .
HM
Macbook 2.16
OS-X 10.4.11
DP 5.13

Volentary promotion for free stuff (UB) that you just have to have
Linplug: Alpha Free
Big Tick: Cheeze Machine, Ticky Clav (Apulsoft Mac Ports)
U-HE: Triple Cheese
Lernvall Audio: LAConvolver (IR player)
Yohng: W1 Limiter (L1 "clone")
Sonalksis: FreeG (Advanced Fader/Gain/Meter)
spinnakersound

Waves is truly Nuts

Post by spinnakersound »

The only workaround is to launch DP on the first machine and then insert the dongle in the second and launch DP.. You can both work in DP simultaneously. If you're working in the same building and one or the other needs a restart .. no problem.. If not.. too bad for the guy without the dongle.
Works for me
duncan
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Tucson AZ
Contact:

Post by duncan »

Replacement for Waves Rvox? This seems to be an auto-release type of comp, which is different from most compressor emulations. It's rather transparent, bringing vocals up in the mix without drastically changing their tonality.

Replacement for Waves MaxxBass?
"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will wipe out an entire species."
pcm
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: woodstock, ny

Post by pcm »

Shooshie wrote:
pcm wrote:The C4 is in daily use here as well. I also have the L316, but use the L2 most of the time anyway. The API 2500 is a must have for me, as well as the Neve EQs. Fact is, they make a lot of stuff that I must have. :-)

PCM, if you like the C4, and I know you do, then you really should try the Linear Phase Multi-Band processor. It should be called the C5. It's the C4 with an extra band, plus it's got extra capabilities, like auto-leveling and linear phase accuracy. You probably know about it, but I was just wondering why you'd be using the C4 and not the C5.

Shooshie
I know I SHOULD like it, but the C5 never had the *magic* to me.
Post Reply