Waves is truly NUTS!

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Post by FMiguelez »

beautypill wrote:
FMiguelez wrote:.


:)

How about Doppler?
So you wanna play rough, huh?

:)

Check this out.

- c

Yes, rough players :lol: :lol:

Ok. That one looks deep.
You also came up with an answer very fast. I suppose you own that one, or at least played with it??

I totally know what you mean, though. Waves already has some serious competition out there. That's a fact.

Having said that, let's not forget that having a healthy variety of plugs by different vendors is great. BUT, it also can become a PITA to keep track of more upgrades, trouble shooting, different policies by each company whose plugs you own, etc. This might be one thing I'd miss from Waves if I do dump them.

How many companies do you think it would take to equal in number and quality the Platinum or Diamond bundles?
Not that this would stop me from trying other things, but it would make the managing part slightly harder.
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
beautypill
Posts: 570
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:32 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Post by beautypill »

Personally, I don't think it's difficult to manage plug-ins from different vendors. If anything, it's kind of fun. It's not that much of a headache.

But, fair enough, if uniformity is your concern, I would go with these guys and get everything they make. They are the new market leaders in sound quality and the people within the company are just nice folks.

I mean, check out MOTU for example. Larger than many music software companies, but not huge. MOTU may have its struggles, but I don't think any of us perceive them as greedy or vicious. MOTU is a company staffed with human beings. The other day I had a problem with opening a DP file I asked for help on this very board. Magic Dave offers, out of the kindness of his heart, to take some time out of his day to help me personally. And you know what? He did help me! He fixed the problem.

Magic Dave and I; we are not friends, we have never met, he doesn't owe me anything. He just did it because he's a cool guy. It's not a matter of corporate policy; he's a human being. This is a principle Waves has wholly forgotten. I mean, try being human beings for a moment, Waves! Listen to your customers as individuals and address their concerns as individuals.

That their arrogance hasn't cost them all of their customers is a testament to the brainwashing power of marketing.

The companies I'm trying to steer you towards have a better culture than Waves.

They're the future.

- c
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Post by FMiguelez »

beautypill wrote:
The companies I'm trying to steer you towards have a better culture than Waves.

They're the future.

- c
And I appreciate your input and suggestions. I have bookmarked them all, and I will thoroughly check them out later (it's 3 am here already).

But come on, beautypill...
Beautypill wrote:Personally, I don't think it's difficult to manage plug-ins from different vendors. If anything, it's kind of fun. It's not that much of a headache.
Is that your idea of fun? :D
Well, I should shut up, 'cause MY ideas of fun are not better at all.

Man, aren't we a bunch of geeks? I LOVE it!! We ought to get out of our studios a bit more often, though :lol:

Ok, my friend. I'm going to bed. You were a good opponent in the plug-in game, I admit. Any other takers? There are a ton of plugs left...
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
beautypill
Posts: 570
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:32 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Post by beautypill »

FM -

Yeah, it's late here too. Insomnia on my part.

The main thing to remember: all of Waves plug-ins are ordinary these days, with one exception.

In my opinion, the only thing that Waves make that beats everyone else is their API package. It is frighteningly good. The EQs sound identical to our hardware in the studio, which is truly mindblowing. (We like having the hardware too, but honestly it's largely out of sentimentality at this point...)

I could not live without that Waves API package and, believe me, I hate Waves a lot so it's a painful dependency. I wish someone else would develop a competing product, but API has an agreement with Waves and has threatened to sue anyone else who tries to step into the ring.

- c
stiefelmusik
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Germany

Post by stiefelmusik »

Shooshie wrote:One more thing; search through the files here, and you'll find that I was often the lone voice of support for Waves in threads where everyone was trashing the company.
I'm glad you pointed this out, Shooshie, as I was starting to get confused. I must have missed the thread where you turned the corner regarding Waves. I remember you as a vocal Waves plugin supporter. Wow. They must have really P'd you off!

I think James' idea of a detailed Waves alternative thread/sticky is a very good idea. Not out of bitterness towards Waves, the company, but rather given the fact that lately, Waves has not been exactly "DP friendly" and a list of alternatives could be helpful for some folks.

Personally, I have never owned a Waves plugin. Nor have I ever wanted to. While I have to admit, many of them sound fantastic, I have never liked their business model, and have very little respect for the company itself. Granted, morality hasn't stopped me from purchasing (once) from Behringer... but from everything I've ever heard, read, etc. about Waves, it is simply not a company I would ever want to do business with.

For alternatives, I have looked towards Wavearts and UAD. I couldn't be happier with this decision! Not only are their plugins terrific, my limited dealings with both companies have been nothing short of stellar.

Waves plugins? Thanks, but NO THANKS! Really, who needs them?!

I'm sorry this isn't much help to those already holding the bag... but sometimes you just have to suck it up and move on. Again, as an example, I was a long time Cubase user. I invested a lot of time and money along the way, and eventually became so fed up with Steinberg that I bailed. It was painful at first, but I am SO over it now, I rarely even think about it any more. I now have DP, Pro Tools LE, and Ableton Live... and with these three programs, I can do just about anything!
HeadMaster
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:40 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by HeadMaster »

FMiguelez wrote:.

Ok. I'll play.

ENIGMA is one I can think of. What's the replacement?
Have a look at audiodamage's dr.device, most probably it wont cover it all, but it's a good half way, and it cost like 50 bucks.

. . .
HM
Macbook 2.16
OS-X 10.4.11
DP 5.13

Volentary promotion for free stuff (UB) that you just have to have
Linplug: Alpha Free
Big Tick: Cheeze Machine, Ticky Clav (Apulsoft Mac Ports)
U-HE: Triple Cheese
Lernvall Audio: LAConvolver (IR player)
Yohng: W1 Limiter (L1 "clone")
Sonalksis: FreeG (Advanced Fader/Gain/Meter)
HeadMaster
Posts: 322
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:40 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by HeadMaster »

FMiguelez wrote:.


:)

How about Doppler?
http://wavearts.com/Panorama5.html
Macbook 2.16
OS-X 10.4.11
DP 5.13

Volentary promotion for free stuff (UB) that you just have to have
Linplug: Alpha Free
Big Tick: Cheeze Machine, Ticky Clav (Apulsoft Mac Ports)
U-HE: Triple Cheese
Lernvall Audio: LAConvolver (IR player)
Yohng: W1 Limiter (L1 "clone")
Sonalksis: FreeG (Advanced Fader/Gain/Meter)
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

beautypill wrote:You are talking to a man who legally owns (or has tried) nearly every legitimate plug-in in the world*, including the dreaded Waves Mercury bundle.

I know what I'm talking about.

Waves is waaaaay over-rated in the sound quality field. They have been lazy and obsessed with money, not innovation. Market dominance does not mean better quality.
I completely agree. Many of their most famous plugins have been around for 10 years or more with no alterations other than (apparently) keeping them compatible with new systems. That's generally done in the shell, anyway, not the actual plugin. I still like many of those, but I completely agree that they're getting long in the tooth.
beautypill wrote: As a company Waves are no longer on the cutting edge.

The single exception is the API package, which I admitted earlier on this thread is truly extraordinary.

I'm serious about this: Waves is not the ruling class anymore. That stopped being the case many years ago.
I don't really know what Waves does as a company. I know they're into more than just plugins. Their maxxbass algorithms are sold to many companies for use in devices like Bose speakers, small handheld players and boomboxes to make them sound bigger than they really are. Even movies and broadcast, use it. But I don't think it qualifies as cutting edge in any sense.

That said, I have to say that the L3 limiter series (L3 Ultramaximizer, L3 MultiMaximizer, LL3 Ultra and Multi, and the L3-16-Band, etc) is VERY exciting, and possibly cutting edge. It's so different that it's very difficult to talk about it to anyone who hasn't mastered it. By that, I mean that using it is not enough. Until you're actually sure of what you're doing, how it works, and one knows how to manipulate it for one's own ends, then one really is unlikely to understand this plugin. It's not at all like "five one-band limiters," such as the MOTU Masterworks Limiter which gives you 3 bands. It works on a principle of 1 limiter with 5 bands of priority that are EQ'd, mixed and summed before limiting. It is phase coherent, and the possibilities are not obvious until you understand its workings.

Sorry to go off on that tangent, but I'm just demonstrating that the L3 is not merely a rehash of previous successes, but a whole new approach to limiting as far as I can tell. If there are other limiters working under the priority/summation/limiting principle, I'm not aware of them.

That has been an outgrowth of the old C4 processor (which was amazing), its successor -- the LinearPhase MultiBand Processor, and the L2 Limiter-- all combined into one, but with a different method of summation: by percentage priority rather than only range, threshold, gain, and so forth. To me, that's pretty cutting edge.
beautypill wrote: You just have to open your eyes to the smarter, hipper, more dedicated competition. They're smaller companies... it's kind of like the worldwide Microbrewphenomenon that started to blossom about fifteen years ago, where the smaller companies produce higher quality beer because of devoting more love and attention to the product.

In addition to better sound quality (remember: most plug-in makers are obsessives), the business practices of these smaller companies is much more respectful to the user. They treat you like a human being because they are. This is extremely important. Just as important as sound quality, in some cases.

There's lots of innovation going on these days that has nothing to do with the Waves behemoth.
Once again, I agree here. I'm SOOO relieved to see the "microbrew" plugins popping up left and right, though it's not necessarily good that they have adopted boutique pricing as well. There's something to be said for profit through bulk, rather than trying to squeeze everything possible out of a handful of customers.

I'd love to be done with Waves, but the L3 postponed my departure date. ;) Seriously, that's one piece of work. I could take that, the Mastering Bundle, and the Stereo Separation plugins (S1, etc.) and leave the rest, I think, though I use quite a few more than that. Altiverb will always be my reverb, as long as Audio Ease keeps it current. My meters are Elemental Audio (now Roger Nichols), EQ is largely the MOTU Masterworks, and I think I'll be using the MOTU compressor in DP6. So, gradually my plugin stable is breaking off chunks of the Waves domain and reducing it to just a few horses in the barn. That's what I want.

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
User avatar
Shooshie
Posts: 19820
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Shooshie »

HeadMaster wrote:
FMiguelez wrote:.


:)

How about Doppler?
http://wavearts.com/Panorama5.html
I didn't know Panorama would do a doppler effect, but apparently it does! I've been wanting to buy it for a different reason. With Panorama, you can listen through headphones and hear what you'd hear through room speakers. It mixes the channels in the same way that each ear hears both speakers, simulating the sound of stereo or multi-channel listening, playing the final mix through the phones for a very realistic effect. I think it may be possible to mix completely through good headphones using Panorama. (emphasis on the word " good" headphones)

Hmmm... I may have to get Panorama.

Shooshie
|l| OS X 10.12.6 |l| DP 10.0 |l| 2.4 GHz 12-Core MacPro Mid-2012 |l| 40GB RAM |l| Mach5.3 |l| Waves 9.x |l| Altiverb |l| Ivory 2 New York Steinway |l| Wallander WIVI 2.30 Winds, Brass, Saxes |l| Garritan Aria |l| VSL 5.3.1 and VSL Pro 2.3.1 |l| Yamaha WX-5 MIDI Wind Controller |l| Roland FC-300 |l|
maswot
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:31 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by maswot »

Hi

I've just upgraded my Waves Gold after a very, very long time, and while I have to say that the Waves site is pretty confusing, especially if it's to update a product that you bought originally in the pre-Internet days, I have to give high marks to the Waves Support Team for answering my emails quickly and guiding me slowly but surely to a solution. After reading the comments on this and other threads, I was ready for the worst. But in all honesty, they got me up and running with very personalised responses to my questions and I have nothing but good to say about the quality of their support services. Yes, they are not cheap plugs, and for a while there were some compatibility issues with DP on the Mac Intels, but a certain amount of patience is required with any major platform change. Just wanted to share my recent experience, which was surprisingly positive. -- Marc
My karma ran over my dogma
User avatar
FMiguelez
Posts: 8266
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Body: Narco-México Soul/Heart: NYC

Post by FMiguelez »

.

It's great you've had a good experience with Waves.

I, too, had the same at first. But one thing is being patient, and another thing is feeling cheated, and BEING cheated. Lots of people here were left without support for DP for 18 months, even though their (our) WUPs were current.

All Waves needs to do, at least for me, to restore a little of their image and confidence in them, is to fix whatever bugs or issues arise when DP6 arives PRONTO. And that they don't make us DP users feel like we are a bunch of losers using the worst piece of DAW crap in the market :roll:

That's all I ask. If I get that I would continue to be in bed with them, and even might give them my cash for additional licenses. But when the Waves guy tell you on the phone that he can sell you a Waves Mercury bundle but can not (and will not) assure you Waves will keep supporting
DP, then you are like.... errrrr.... right!

Let's see how it goes with DP6. We'll know soon enough.

Good luck to all of us!
Mac Mini Server i7 2.66 GHs/16 GB RAM / OSX 10.14 / DP 9.52
Tascam DM-24, MOTU Track 16, all Spectrasonics' stuff,
Vienna Instruments SUPER PACKAGE, Waves Mercury, slaved iMac and Mac Minis running VEP 7, etc.

---------------------------

"In physics the truth is rarely perfectly clear, and that is certainly universally the case in human affairs. Hence, what is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." ― Richard Feynman
User avatar
kgdrum
Posts: 4068
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

Post by kgdrum »

I stopped using waves a while ago(I had the gold bundle OS 9)which I had for about 6 months,well when I saw what they wanted to make me pay to go to OSX I said screw em,I only looked back 1 time about 2 years ago, when they had a crazy upgrade promotion.trying to woo back defectors (I think :) )
when I thought about WUP as well as how bad their attitude towards keeping customers happy is ,I could not in good conscience give this company my $$ or support .
UAD has become my go to company for effects,my waves experience is limited but what I had and heard was very 90's cool and all but the UAD stuff makes things sound less digital almost analog sounding which I prefer (I use many others plugs as well) I love the products,the company and the support.

I'd much rather pick and choose my plugs and give business to nicer companies that at least try to make the user experience friendly.
KG
Last edited by kgdrum on Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
2012 Mac Pro 3.46GHz 12 core 96 gig,Mojave, DP11.01,Logic 10.51, RME UCX,Great River ME-1NV,a few microphones,UAD2, Komplete 12U,U-he,Omni & way too many VI's,Synths & FX galore!, Mimic Pro w/ SD3,Focal Twin 6 monitors, Shunyata...........
beautypill
Posts: 570
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:32 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Contact:

Post by beautypill »

kgdrum wrote: UAD has become my go to company for effects,my waves experience is limited but what I had and heard was very 90's cool and all but the UAD stuff makes things sound less DAW oriented which I prefer (I use many others plugs as well) I love the products,the company and the support.
UAD is a lovely company, clearly staffed with people who actually care and are excited about music and sound. Yes, it's a corporation like any other that wants to make a profit. But you can tell there's heart there.

Just read their (adorably geeky, over-enthusiastic) newsletters or, y'know, give 'em a call.

UAD is superior in every way to Waves. As soon as the UAD2 card comes out, there will be no way to deny it.

- c
User avatar
kwiz
Posts: 1345
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC
Contact:

Post by kwiz »

beautypill wrote:
kgdrum wrote:
UAD is superior in every way to Waves. As soon as the UAD2 card comes out, there will be no way to deny it.

- c
Amen to that!
Great family and friends!

Mac Studio M2 Max, MacPro 8 core (trashcan), MacBook Pro 16 in 2023, OSX Ventura, DP 11, Pro Tools, Logic Pro X, Motu 112D, 24Ao, 8M, 896 MKIII, UA Apollo 16, Waves Horizon, Slate Everything Bundle, Plugin Alliance Bundle, UAD-2 Satellite DSP Accelerator, UAD Apollo Twin.
Native Instruments Komplete 14 Ultimate, Console 1 MKIII w/C1 Fader

"Without struggle, there is no progress"

F. Douglas
soundhacker
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: zagreb,croatia

Post by soundhacker »

and dont forget guys like Massey...
highend plugz for (more than) reasonable price...
Post Reply