anyone?

kassonica · Post by **kassonica** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:23 am

billf wrote:I only listen to DP in mono.

kassonica · Post by **kassonica** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:24 am

the one has been moved

Only the one could have done this

jarok · Post by **jarok** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:11 am

One more to go .....maybe?

Matcher · Post by **Matcher** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:22 am

...and one down?

Spikey Horse · Post by **Spikey Horse** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:28 am

kassonica wrote:the one has been moved

Strange.... this can't be off topic, there has only been one topic.

----
Apple I, OS1.1, 1GB ram, DP1, Mach One, Kontakt 1, BFD 1, MX1, MOTU 828 (mk1), VSL (solo strings), Devine Machine One Shot Recorder, Eastwest 'Most Complete Sample Collection Ever' Vol. 1

kassonica · Post by **kassonica** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:13 am

the one thread has been moved

one oneness one more

monkey man · Post by **monkey man** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:14 am

If we weren't so extremely talented and carefree, this thread'd be embarrassing.

Oh, OK... when in Rome:
If we weren't so extremely talented and carefree, this'd be one embarrassing thread.

Matcher · Post by **Matcher** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:34 am

Don't forget that we are also supafly.

1. supafly

A term used to describe someone who's really cool or good-looking. Also see sexy.

Damn, that guy's supafly!

2. supafly

adj.- extremely new and hip. confidently attractive. Sporting new style.

Whoah, look at Brendan with those new shoes and hot throwback. He's looking supafly

kassonica · Post by **kassonica** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:24 am

monkey man wrote:If we weren't so extremely talented and carefree, this thread'd be embarrassing.

Oh, OK... when in Rome:
If we weren't so extremely talented and carefree, this'd be one embarrassing thread.

or onebarrassing

billf · Post by **billf** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:35 am

Because this is not the porn thread, I do not have a one track mind.

bOing · Post by **bOing** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:26 pm

I didn't have even one minute to visit Uni today or I would have noticed that the one thread was been segrated for reasons which I can only suspect are political. With so many pages and reads, we were becoming a growing political force to be reckoned with and we had to be stopped.

It's also very odd that we were shut out on the twenty one-th day of the month, which, as everyone knows, also has exactly 21 ones in it.

I smell a conspiracy that goes right to the top. Maybe as high as the stickies.

bOing · Post by **bOing** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:28 pm

P.S. When did we ever go off topic?

billf · Post by **billf** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:22 pm

bOing wrote:I didn't have even one minute to visit Uni today or I would have noticed that the one thread was been segrated for reasons which I can only suspect are political. With so many pages and reads, we were becoming a growing political force to be reckoned with and we had to be stopped.

It's also very odd that we were shut out on the twenty one-th day of the month, which, as everyone knows, also has exactly 21 ones in it.

I smell a conspiracy that goes right to the top. Maybe as high as the stickies.

We are united, we are legion, we are one.

madboy · Post by **madboy** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:31 pm

cchord59 wrote:anyone know one?

Once...

madboy · Post by **madboy** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:34 pm

billf wrote:
bOing wrote:
billf wrote:Am I the only one who is wondering why everyone is responding to this thread about anyone?
Here's one theory [couldn't resist a plug for the hometeam!]

Seems there are a lot of friendly, creative people associated with this website. Although the occasional new thread might allow us to stretch our wings and show a little more of who we are as people, most of the replies, although friendly, are rather technical in nature. And once the problem is solved, the dialogue usually ends.

So when the opportunity arises to release a little childlike steam and partake of a little stream of consciousness silliness, we naturally take the opportunity. The topic was an invitation to be inventive. Had it been anything else, it would have ended long ago.

The exception is that Beatle Instrument thread, which is probably far off topic by now as well. We, however, have stayed on the one topic with which we began.

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.

Well that is one theory. I have another one. Personally I think it is the singularity at work. How many times can one mention the word one in a post or a thread? It boggles the mind. It is the one question worth pondering.

I think Mad Boy or Monkey Man or MLC must be one in the same, or not.

Okay, I need sleep.

MLC and the Monkster are the ones...

MOTUnation.com

anyone?

Re: anyone?