¿Is a MacBook-MOTU8pre OK to record 8 Track at 24bit/96Khz?

Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.
Post Reply
javitoya
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

¿Is a MacBook-MOTU8pre OK to record 8 Track at 24bit/96Khz?

Post by javitoya »

I'm planning to buy a computer and a firewire audio interface to make some on site orchestral recording. ¿Does anyone know if a new mac book with 1Gig of ram, a MOTU 8Pre can record at 24/96 without glitches for opera acts like 1 hour and a half steady?¿Can I use an usb2 external hard drive?(the only forewire is used by the motu)

Thanks in advance for the help!!

Javier Gimenez-Zapiola
Buenos Aires, Argentina
User avatar
Dwetmaster
Posts: 3491
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:59 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Montreal Canada

Post by Dwetmaster »

It should be fine even with the internal drive IMHO. you can daisy chain a FW HD and the interface no problem as well
MacPro 8Core 2.8GHZ 16GB RAM OSX10.8.3
MacBook Pro 17" Unibody 2011 OSX10.8.3
896mk3, BLA Modded 896HD, BLA Microclock, MTP-AV, Yamaha KX-8, CME VX-7 Mackie Ctrl, megadrum, Presonus C-S,
DP8.04, Bidule, M5 3, Ethno 2, BPM 1.5 Kontakt4, BFD2, SD2, Omnisphere, Wave Arts P-S5, Altiverb7, PSP VW & OldTimer, VB3, Ivory 2 Grand, True Pianos, Ozone 5, Reason 4, AmpliTube3, Bla bla bla...
A few El & Ac basses & Guitars, Hammond A-100.
rmhofu
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:35 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Earth - The Planet

Post by rmhofu »

Hey Javitoya

Did you try it out? I was running DP 4.6 on a G4 Powerbook with 512MB of RAM and MOTU Traveler. I have recorded up to 8 tracks at the same time without hassle and that was pushing it given my RAM. I've just bought the Macbook (Intel) and will be running a test (1GB). I would like to know your results if you have tried it already though.


Roy[/img]
1 - "If it ain't broke, don't fix it, but if something BETTER comes along, then make the change".

2 - "If it was easy, then everybody would do it, if you want to be good at it, then slave for it"

3 - "Passion always finds a way"
User avatar
BradLyons
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Windows
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Post by BradLyons »

Yes, it will work just fine---depending on the hard-drive, I'm not a fan of USB for audio.
Thank you,
Brad Lyons
db AUDIO & VIDEO
-Systems Advisor, CTS
aitikin
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:19 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by aitikin »

I'm anti-USB for large files period. USB is a burst speed, meaning it can send one burst up to 480Mb/s (Megabits, not bytes, and that's version 2.0) and then another and another, but it cannot keep a constant 480. If you're going to be doing any major bandwidth usage, firewire/ieee1394 (whatever you wanna call it) is a must. There's a reason that there are so few high end USB interfaces...if any? I'm sure Brad can correct me on that.
"It's not a recording studio without a lava lamp"
~Mark Rubel
User avatar
BradLyons
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Windows
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Post by BradLyons »

AGREED... on paper, USB2 is better than Firewire400 but in reality, it's NOT as good for streaming.
Thank you,
Brad Lyons
db AUDIO & VIDEO
-Systems Advisor, CTS
awinn002
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:25 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by awinn002 »

even better than firewire 400 and usb 2.0 is esata at 1.5Gb/s. You can get a sata card for a laptop (pcmcia) or a pci sata card
WSVP
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by WSVP »

awinn002 wrote:even better than firewire 400 and usb 2.0 is esata at 1.5Gb/s. You can get a sata card for a laptop (pcmcia) or a pci sata card
This would be a good idea with a "Macbook Pro" but unfortunately the "Macbook" does not have an express 34 slot (and PCMIA is no longer built in any Macs).

I also agree with the others about USB 2.0... USB requires more processor arbitration than Firewire does... thus more load on the CPU. Another very important thing to keep in mind is that not all Firewire interfaces will play nicely with a FW drive on the same port. In many cases the only option with the Macbook or an iMac is to record to the internal drive, this may work fine if it is a fast enough drive. If you have the money a "Macbook Pro" is a much better choice for audio or video, but it is about twice the price.
duncan
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Tucson AZ
Contact:

Post by duncan »

If you don't need 8 channels, perhaps a USB audio interface would be a better choice.

Another consideration - 96K isn't going to help your sound quality when you're using cheap preamps. You'll just have cheap sound at 96K.

Have you checked out some of the dedicated 2 track mini-recorders? If you could find one with a big enough storage medium, that might be a better way to go. Or a used Alesis HD24. They're bullet-proof. The HD24XR has better convertors, and 96K capability, but you'd still need an external preamp with a +4 output to go to the HD24 line inputs.
"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will wipe out an entire species."
javitoya
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

¿Is a MacBook-MOTU8pre OK to record 8 Track at 24bit/96Khz?

Post by javitoya »

Thanks everyone for your help!!

I think I will go for the macbook since the hard drive on the macbook pro aren't faster or better than the drives in the macbook pro. Regarding preamps...¿Are motu's preamps that bad? I don't think that the mics I willl use are better...unless anyone knows a 4 Preamp firewire unit that will make the job better.
Any help will be great.

Thanks!
Post Reply