Shortage of LM instances in DP 5.12

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Post Reply
KED
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:35 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

Shortage of LM instances in DP 5.12

Post by KED »

Hi All,


I'm not able to open the number of LM instances in DP that I'm supposed to be able to (according to the LM manager). Yes I do have LM on a dedicated PCI-E firewire card and bus, but for an example, even at 44.1, opening up 6 tracks worth of LM makes my system choke and stutters. It stops when I close one or more. I have Logic and don't experience this

Has anyone else experienced this? I also have my work priority set to low (I think this was recommended). Any ideas?
Quad G5 with 5 GBs of Ram, OSX Leopard 10.5.4, Apogee Ensemble, Liquid Mix 2.3 b12 with DSP Expansion, DP 5.13, Logic Pro 8.02, Mackie Control, Tranzport, and tons of other stuff....
User avatar
waxman
Posts: 1953
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Dana Point, CA

Post by waxman »

i use 20 channels all the time.
make sure you set them to always run in real time.
waxman
DP9.5, Macbook Pro (2018) Mojave, Slate VMS mic, Everything Bundle, Dual Raven MTI 2, Apollo Twin Quad, UAD Arrow, UAD Satellite Octo Tbolt and all the UAD plugs, NI Komplete 11 Ultimate & Arturia V Collection 6, Maschine Studio MK3 Hardware, NI Komplete Kontrol 61s MK 2, Spectrasonics Ominisphere, Superior Drummer, BFD3, Ozone 7, Altiverb, Sound Toys, Waves, Final Cut X. PT 11.
TommyWhy
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

my 2.66 Intel sometimes chokes on low instantiations.

Post by TommyWhy »

If I just go to the hardware driver setup screen and hit cancel, the problem is solved, but Liquid Mix instances do seem to chew up a lot of CPU... I've not tested numbers like 32, but have gotten to probably 14 or so while taking a not so modest cpu hit. I've been using it less as a result. Considering a move to UAD-1 at some point. (and I do set them to run in real time, and I do have a dedicated fw buss to the liquid mix).

T
mon
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by mon »

Maybe check your buffer settings? Make sure they're not too low. Are you trying to track with the LM plugs in or are you doing mixdowns? Do you have VI's running?

Although Logic does seem to handle the LM a tad better than DP does, the LM is certainly useable with DP I think.
Last edited by mon on Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
David Polich
Posts: 4839
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by David Polich »

If you are only getting five or six instances of LM, using a dedicated FW buss for it, then something else is wrong. The whole point of Liquid Mix is to take the load off your computer.

As the above post suggested, check your buffer settings. Liquid Mix runs happiest at the equivalent of 512 (in the LM hardware setup it's listed as "520").

I'd contact Focusrite tech support about it - they're very good about returning e-mails. They're in England, so give them at least 18-24 hours to reply.
mon
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by mon »

David Polich wrote: I'd contact Focusrite tech support about it - they're very good about returning e-mails. They're in England, so give them at least 18-24 hours to reply.
This is good advice; Focusrite has excellent support.
Also remember that stereo tracks count as two instances of the LM plugin.
KED
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:35 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

Post by KED »

Thanks for the suggestions. I do use VIs and for the most part when I'm trying to run multiple instances of LM, I'm not tracking. 512 (520 in LM Manager) is the min latency I have selected.

I sent Focusrite an email before I posted this so I'm waiting for the response. When it's figured out, I'll post the solution. Any other suggestions in the meantime?
Quad G5 with 5 GBs of Ram, OSX Leopard 10.5.4, Apogee Ensemble, Liquid Mix 2.3 b12 with DSP Expansion, DP 5.13, Logic Pro 8.02, Mackie Control, Tranzport, and tons of other stuff....
User avatar
kassonica
Posts: 5231
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by kassonica »

I believe that it works best at a buffer of 1024 have you tried that yet.
Creativity, some digital stuff and analogue things that go boom. crackle, bits of wood with strings on them that go twang
User avatar
emulatorloo
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Iowa

Post by emulatorloo »

Yes I do have LM on a dedicated PCI-E firewire card and bus, but for an example, even at 44.1, opening up 6 tracks worth of LM makes my system choke and stutters. It stops when I close one or more. I have Logic and don't experience this

Has anyone else experienced this? I also have my work priority set to low (I think this was recommended). Any ideas?

I do not have liquid mix (and dammit I want it) but I do have the internets:

Does Liquid Mix work with other firewire devices?
http://www.focusrite.com/answerbase/article.php?id=234

We have tested and approved the following PCI firewire card chipsets:

- VIA
- Texas Instruments
- NEC

------
Is your firewire card based on one of those chipsets? As I say I do not have liquid mix but have found out the hard way thru experience to stick w what the manufacturer recommends re chipsets -- things "seem to work" but then don't actually work.

---------------------------------------------------------------

As to the work priority it sounds like it depends on what buffer you are running:


http://www.focusrite.com/answerbase/article.php?id=208

How do I optimise buffer settings in Digital Performer for use with Liquid Mix?

In addition to a standard size buffer setting, Digital Performer also has an additional setting called "Work Priority". The default value for this setting is 'High'. If you would like to use a buffer size of 1024 KB with your Liquid Mix, you may need to set the Work Priority setting to 'Low' or 'Medium'. Otherwise you could experience incontinuity in audio streaming. The buffer settings for Digital Performer are accessed in "Setup > Configure Audio System > Configure Hardware Driver..." as shown in Figure 1 below.

Fig.1

Image

------------------------------------------------------------------------

GOOD LUCK-- I have been wanting liquid mix so will be interested to hear what happens. That product looks great.

PS> isn't there a newish driver to download?

--[/i]
David Polich
Posts: 4839
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by David Polich »

Yes - version 2.0 is available from Focusrite's site as a download.
Last edited by David Polich on Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
mon
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by mon »

Here is the latest software:

http://www.focusrite.com/index.php?page ... liquid_mix

Make sure you have the LM connected when you install.

Although it is not a convenient way to work and I hate doing it try freezing the more CPU hungry VI tracks and delete the VI's (save your MIDI and settings).
KED
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:35 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

Every-thing's Working (& More)

Post by KED »

All,


I wanted to thank you for all of the suggestions. The solutions to my problems with LM & DP were in those suggestions. I will detail them for others who may encounter the problems I did, I also did some further testing to give my fellow Unicornians insight on LM, DP & Focusrite.

First, waxman nailed it with the suggestion to make sure each instance of the LM plug was set to "Always Run In Real-Time." Once I did this, surely I was able to open 26 mono instances of LM without any problem in DP. I was running them at a buffer setting of 512, "Medium" Work Priority and Host Buffer Multiplier of 1. When I tried to open more instances, my system began to stutter and of course the DP cpu meter was going into the red (although in Activity Monitor, LM never used more than 6% processing power on my computer). I was determined to open 32 instances just to see if I could do it.

Next, I used TommyWhy's suggestion of hitting cancel in the "Hardware Driver Setup" screen and that usually worked when I would encounter the stutter but I still needed a solution for opening more instances without triggering the problem again. I found that increasing the Host Buffer Multiplier to 2 and above usually solved this. Guys (and Ladies), I was able to open all 32 mono instances (just as Focusrite said it would) @ 44.1k, 512 buffer and the DP CPU meter was fine.

I said, "Let me try this at a buffer setting of 256," and I was able to accomplish the same thing of 32 mono instances by increasing the Host Buffer Multiplier to 3 or 4. I tried the higher sample rates and it was fine.

Andy at Focusrite Support responded to my initial email and was very helpful with his suggestions (although you guys had already given me the answers) and would respond very quickly.

Also, I have my my LM connected to a SIIG Firewire 800 3-Port PCIE card. No problems with it.

Lastly, waxman, TommyWhy, mon, kassonica, emulatorloo, & David, thank you for the suggestions. :D
Quad G5 with 5 GBs of Ram, OSX Leopard 10.5.4, Apogee Ensemble, Liquid Mix 2.3 b12 with DSP Expansion, DP 5.13, Logic Pro 8.02, Mackie Control, Tranzport, and tons of other stuff....
ECmaj7
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 12:21 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by ECmaj7 »

Glad to hear the problemm is solved.
Always Run In Real-Time is a must in DP.

I wish there was a Liquid Mix users group.
It is a very daunting machine to learn, so many choices, so little time.
I just discovered the Empirical Labs EL8 Distressor, wow...
I would love to share presets etc...
Maye I should start one.

Sorry for the rat hole....

Emilio
mon
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by mon »

Thanks for reporting back, KED. I'm sorry my tips weren't any of the lucky winners but those other guys are pretty smart!

I remember there was another DAW that was supposed to have Always run in realtime checked; maybe it was Live, while Cubase and Logic shouldn't have it checked.

I wish I could remember where I read that. But I think that's it. Anyone know?
Post Reply