Off topic - "A" is 440kHZ, what's "B"?

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
mr miyagi
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Contact:

Off topic - "A" is 440kHZ, what's "B"?

Post by mr miyagi »

Does anyone have a resource to help me determine what the different kHZ are for musical notes? Thanks! :)
2.5Ghz G5, DP 4.61, OSX 10.4.5, 2408MK3/PCI-424, MTP/AV, UAD-1, Spectrasonics, Mach5, GPO, Albino, Panasonic DA7
User avatar
simonr
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:02 am
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by simonr »

User avatar
bkshepard
Posts: 1094
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Setúbal, Portugal
Contact:

Post by bkshepard »

BTW, A=440Hz is just an agreed-upon convention that many musicians use. Over the last two centuries, the frequency of A (as well as all the other notes) has gradually risen. 200 years ago or so, A was around 400 Hz. Some orchestras today, are even tuning a little higher around 442Hz or so.
-Brian

Mac M1 Ultra 20-core, OS 14.6.1, 128 GB RAM, DP 11.3.2, UA Apollo x6
mr miyagi
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Contact:

Post by mr miyagi »

thanks Simon, exactly what I need!
2.5Ghz G5, DP 4.61, OSX 10.4.5, 2408MK3/PCI-424, MTP/AV, UAD-1, Spectrasonics, Mach5, GPO, Albino, Panasonic DA7
User avatar
mhschmieder
Posts: 11393
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Annandale VA

Post by mhschmieder »

Simon's ref should tell you what you need to know for the specific question at hand.

In case you find yourself collaborating with, or writing for, Europeans, note that historically the standard has been slightly different with A=438 being common (at least mid-20th-century).

Many plug-ins support switching the standard pitch; although this feature is often hidden. Choosing different temperaments also has an impact on the relative pitch.

For most practical purposes, though, that chart from the Michigan Tech Physics Dept. should suffice.
iMac 27" 2017 Quad-Core Intel i5 (3.8 GHz, 64 GB), OSX 13.7.1, MOTU DP 11.34, SpectraLayers 11
RME Babyface Pro FS, Radial JDV Mk5, Hammond XK-4, Moog Voyager

Eugenio Upright, 60th Anniversary P-Bass, USA Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BBP35
Select Strat, 70th Anniversary Esquire, Johnny Marr Jaguar, 57 LP, Danelectro 12
Eastman T486RB, T64/V, Ibanez PM2, D'angelico Deluxe SS Bari, EXL1
Guild Bari, 1512 12-string, M20, Martin OM28VTS, Larivee 0040MH
User avatar
sdemott
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Connecticut
Contact:

Post by sdemott »

Yeah - then you get a jerk like me who insists on A415 for reasons of history & physics (okay - and I think it sounds more natural).

Total trivia here. When they found Antonio Stradivari's tuning fork it measured a solid 414.97Hz. And it has long been known among Stradivarius owners that tuning down a half step (the equivalent of A415) makes the instrument sing. I even once had the pleasure of recording a fine Stradivarius that was tuned down and it was a beautiful sound.

FWIW A415 is often referred to as Baroque Tuning or Baroque Standard.

I am a font of useless information :D
-Steve
Not all who wander are lost.
Jim
Posts: 2013
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Post by Jim »

User avatar
Mr_Clifford
Posts: 2430
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:56 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
Contact:

Post by Mr_Clifford »

sdemott wrote: I even once had the pleasure of recording a fine Stradivarius that was tuned down and it was a beautiful sound.

FWIW A415 is often referred to as Baroque Tuning or Baroque Standard.

I am a font of useless information :D
So there you go. Guns n' Roses, AC/DC & Van Halen actually tune down a half step because they're students of baroque music history.

Can you imagine Angus Young & Slash having an argument over the proper 'authentic' way to play a baroque mordent?
DP 9.52 Mac Pro 10.14.6 RME fireface800. Sibelius. Dorico 4
artfarm1
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Maryland, USA
Contact:

Post by artfarm1 »

Hi...... these links will help you find any note and any frequency!

http://www.michaelnorris.info/freqtonote.html

http://www.vortexmaps.com/htmla/hertz.htm
bongo_x
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Post by bongo_x »

Mr_Clifford wrote: ...So there you go. Guns n' Roses, AC/DC & Van Halen actually tune down a half step because they're students of baroque music history...
really? I never noticed that (the tuning down part, not the baroque music studies). interesting, I'm always surprised by how unobservant I can be.

I sometimes work with a rock band that always tunes a half step down (and are big ac/dc and van halen fans, hmmm...). they've done it for so long that they forget all about it. so when they say somethings in ""A", you guessed it, I'm completely confused. if I wasn't a total caveman, musically (and body hair-wise), it wouldn't be that big of a deal I guess.

I thought they were just being lazy jackasses who didn't want to sing that high, I didn't know they were being snooty musicologists.

bb
User avatar
mhschmieder
Posts: 11393
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Annandale VA

Post by mhschmieder »

I hesitated to mention the connection of Death Metal to Baroque as it seemed O.T., but I guess now everything is fair game :-).

FWIW, I think the motivation is similar, as opposed to it being laziness when playing in "difficult" keys. All of the metal, hard rock, and alterna-rock people I have worked with tell me they do it because they prefer the timbre when the instrument is down-tuned. Similar to the Stradivarius Violin having been idealised for A=415.

Thanks for the additional links, and of course Wikipedia is always a good source (though not as a sole source).
iMac 27" 2017 Quad-Core Intel i5 (3.8 GHz, 64 GB), OSX 13.7.1, MOTU DP 11.34, SpectraLayers 11
RME Babyface Pro FS, Radial JDV Mk5, Hammond XK-4, Moog Voyager

Eugenio Upright, 60th Anniversary P-Bass, USA Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BBP35
Select Strat, 70th Anniversary Esquire, Johnny Marr Jaguar, 57 LP, Danelectro 12
Eastman T486RB, T64/V, Ibanez PM2, D'angelico Deluxe SS Bari, EXL1
Guild Bari, 1512 12-string, M20, Martin OM28VTS, Larivee 0040MH
User avatar
marcmarc
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Toulon, France
Contact:

Post by marcmarc »

Try that : http://lost-memories.com/softs/
a freeware which has all you need and more...
wurliuchi
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:34 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by wurliuchi »

marcmarc wrote:Try that : http://lost-memories.com/softs/
a freeware which has all you need and more...
That's sweet! Very nicely done.
User avatar
zed
Posts: 3193
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver, BC

Post by zed »

To 493.88Hz or not to 493.88Hz. That is the question.

marcmarc wrote:Try that : http://lost-memories.com/softs/
a freeware which has all you need and more...
Thanks marcmarc! That is a very useful utility. I'll be getting some regular use out of it. :-)
MacPro 2.8 GHz 8-Core Intel Xeon | 14 GB RAM | OS 10.11.6 | DP 8
User avatar
Phil O
Posts: 7345
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Scituate, MA

Post by Phil O »

zed wrote:To 493.88Hz or not to 493.88Hz. That is the question.
Damn! You beat me to it. Someone always beats me to a great play on words...err numbers. Aw 391.9954!

Phil
DP 11.34. 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 15.3/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
Post Reply