best software Eq

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
User avatar
Appalachian Boy
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:57 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Seattle, WA

best software Eq

Post by Appalachian Boy »

So i recently realized that maybe i shouldn't use the MOTU parametric EQ because it sounds like sh*t.

I am wondering what the best equalizer I could use would be. I recently purchased a "Neve-replica" pre-amp+EQ made by "Chameleon Labs" of Sammamish, WA (can be had from "pacific pro audio" in Seattle, WA). I know that has a beautiful sounding EQ on it which i can loop my signal through. but I am wondering what the most clean, undistorted and best sounding EQ I can get to use within DP5.12 is?

any suggestions for the best sounding EQ i can use within DP? Mainly for convenience.
Mac Pro, 828 MK1x2, Beer....what else?
User avatar
Appalachian Boy
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:57 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Appalachian Boy »

time for bed. And i AM expecting useful answers (by tomorrow morning :D) from you speedy unicornation users!

:lol:
Mac Pro, 828 MK1x2, Beer....what else?
User avatar
blue
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Los Angeles

Re: best software Eq

Post by blue »

Appalachian Bot wrote:So i recently realized that maybe i shouldn't use the MOTU parametric EQ because it sounds like sh*t.
Are you referring to the Masterworks EQ or the older para EQ? The Masterworks EQ is, IMO, a great sounding plugin.
stephentayler
Posts: 2339
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Box, Wiltshire, UK
Contact:

Post by stephentayler »

Foe a variety of great sounding EQs I would recommend the Focusrite Liquidmix. Great compressors too.

I would second the Masterworks EQ as well.

Kind regards

Stephen
Stephen W Tayler: Sound Artist
http://www.chimera-arts.com
http://ostinatomusic.com
http://stephentayler.com

Mac Pro 16Gb RAM, OSX 10.10, DP 8, PT 11, Logic 9.1.8, MOTU Traveler, Ultralite Mk 3 Hybrid, MC MIx, MOTU VIs, Waves, Izotope Everything, Spectrasonics, SoundToys, Slate, Softube, NI , spl Surround Monitor Controller, spl Auditor Headphone amp, Genelec 1031A, 1029 5.1 system, Sontronics Mics, iPad etc..
User avatar
kassonica
Posts: 5231
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by kassonica »

Masterworks EQ both thumbs up here :D
Creativity, some digital stuff and analogue things that go boom. crackle, bits of wood with strings on them that go twang
User avatar
gearboy
Posts: 1426
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Port Richmond, Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by gearboy »

I have the Waves RenEQ, the EQ in Ozone, and the EQs in the Nomad Factory Vintage Bundle, and I still reach for and use the MasterWorks EQ 99% of the time.
OS 10.4.11 - G5 Dual 1.8GHz, 3GB RAM / Mac PB G4 1.5GHz, 1.5GB RAM / Apogee Duet / MOTU 828mkii w/BLA Analog & Clock mod / MOTU DP4.61 / Live5.2 / Peak 4 & 5 LE / Izotope Oz3, Sp, Tr / Waves Ren Max / TRacks, Miroslav / NI Komplete 5 / GF impOSCar, MiniMonsta, M-Tron / Automat / Nomad Factory Vintage Studio Bundle / apTrigga / Audio Hijack Pro

My recording blog: http://www.ipressrecord.com
User avatar
tomeaton
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Newburyport, MA
Contact:

Post by tomeaton »

The Sonox Oxford eq/filters plug is nice, too. Not the best GUI in the world, but sounds good.

-tom
daily performer user since 1987
dp 7.24 / macpro 2.26 eight core / 6 gigs ram / 10.6.8
pci 424 / 2408mkiii / 2x1296 / 308 / mtp-av/mtp2
apogee ad16x and 2xda16x / otari concept elite
and more keyboards than you can shake a stick at
User avatar
sdfalk
Posts: 2514
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Post by sdfalk »

Masterworks EQ..sounds lovely
User avatar
Phil O
Posts: 7346
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Scituate, MA

Post by Phil O »

I second, or fifth, or whatever the vote for MW EQ. There are some other EQs that I have that have their own character, and I use them for that character, but for basic EQing tasks I reach for MW first. It's no slouch!

Phil
DP 11.34. 2020 M1 Mac Mini [9,1] (16 Gig RAM), Mac Pro 3GHz 8 core [6,1] (16 Gig RAM), OS 15.3/11.6.2, Lynx Aurora (n) 8tb, MOTU 8pre-es, MOTU M6, MOTU 828, Apogee Rosetta 800, UAD-2 Satellite, a truckload of outboard gear and plug-ins, and a partridge in a pear tree.
thermos
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by thermos »

Masterworks: unfortunately not really. Not horrible, but not great. I like the Sonalksis eq plug ok, and all the tritone digital eq plugs are excellent. Also, the UAD neve plugs are great.
User avatar
sdfalk
Posts: 2514
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Post by sdfalk »

thermos wrote:Masterworks: unfortunately not really. Not horrible, but not great. I like the Sonalksis eq plug ok, and all the tritone digital eq plugs are excellent. Also, the UAD neve plugs are great.
Shows how subjective this stuff can be..
dont really care for the tritone stuff to much
chrispick
Posts: 3287
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by chrispick »

thermos wrote:Masterworks: unfortunately not really. Not horrible, but not great. I like the Sonalksis eq plug ok, and all the tritone digital eq plugs are excellent. Also, the UAD neve plugs are great.
The poster wondered about clean EQs. It's easy to miss that since he throws it at the end of his post.

The ones you site above are great. I love the UAD stuff - big Pultec and Neve 1073 fan (new convert) here, but I wouldn't describe them as clean. Just the opposite -- I think they add character, mojo, that kind of spicy thing.

I think the cleanest software EQs I've used would be the MWEQ, the UAD-1 Cambridge and iZotope Ozone's EQ. As it is, the MWEQ is almost always enough for me. In honesty, though, there are a lot of third-party ones I haven't tried yet.
Last edited by chrispick on Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
HCMarkus
Posts: 10404
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:01 am
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Rancho Bohemia, California
Contact:

Post by HCMarkus »

I wonder how different the algorithms are from plug to plug... or is it often just a case of a different coat of paint on the same old car? Regardless, I like MWEQ for its sound and flexibility, and the FFT function is very instructive.
HC Markus
M1 Mac Studio Ultra • 64GB RAM • 828es • macOS 15.4.1 • DP 11.34
https://rbohemia.com
User avatar
Appalachian Boy
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:57 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Appalachian Boy »

wow, so it has been right in front of me the whole time!

ive been using motu para-eq...never really thought much about it till i tried MWeq, so i figured there must a better eq out there.

so the MWeq is adequete for most things?
Mac Pro, 828 MK1x2, Beer....what else?
Kubi

Post by Kubi »

MWEQ is good, and a great value since we all already own it.

But in my experience, the proof in how well a (clean) digital EQ performs is in the highs, where almost all of them crap out. This is what sold me on the Sonalksis, which is my favorite meat-and-potatoes clean EQ. ('Colored' EQs are a bit different, they are supposed to do weird things to the audio besides just eq-ing...)

Try it, take a nice clean cymbal or similar high-end rich signal and crank the highs (i.e. 10k or above) by 9dB or so. Make sure to lower the input first so you don't clip. Almost any decent analog EQ will do this without a problem, and while sounding overly bright (you are cranking the highs...) still sound smooth and clear.

I found that most digital plug-ins can't pull this off well and end up sounding grainy or shrill. The Sonalksis is the only one I've tried that can pull it off and sound clean. (Of course I haven't tried them all. The sonnox seems promising, as does the Waves Linear Phase EQ. But I wouldn't know...)

The MWEQ couldn't do it, nor could the RenEQ, and of course none of my 'colored' eq's. I still occasionally use RenEQ for it's ease and 'old-timey' color, and regularly use my URS EQs for the particular color they impart when needed.

Tritone's Hydratone and Angeltone were actually very good, depending on the model used, but they usually take down DP so they're on the sh*tlist right now. And I don't mean shortlist. :roll:

Of course I find I can still get great results mixing with the MWEQ - especially if I stick mostly to subtractive eq-ing, and keep boosts to 3dB or so max. Which more often than not is the better approach anyway. But I highly recommend demoing the Sonalksis, it's an amazing EQ that'll allow you to use it as if it were a decent analog EQ: sometimes you want to boost something by 8-10dB or more...
Post Reply