itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

For seeking technical help with Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
This forum is for seeking solutions to technical problems involving Digital Performer and/or plug-ins on MacOS, as well as feature requests, criticisms, comparison to other DAWs.
Post Reply
Jaysplace101
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Colorado

itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by Jaysplace101 »

I don't know if anyone else has run into this. I finished a mix and encoded it into an mp3 with DP. Then opened it and it defaults to itunes. Well, it sounds like crap (I mean, even for an mp3.) I opened it into quicktime, and it sounds fine. I changed the import settings in itunes, and no matter what I choose it's still the same when re-imiporting. I've run into this before, and thought it was my imagination, but this time I'm for sure about it. Sounds WAY fuller and nicer in quicktime than itunes.

Anyone?

jayman
User avatar
wonder
Posts: 1482
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: LA/OC
Contact:

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by wonder »

make sure your export settings in DP are set to a higher quality
Dual Quad-Core 2.8 GHz Mac Pro 3,1 • Yosemite • 24 GB RAM • MOTU 2408mk3 (x's 2) • DP 10.xx • Finale 25 • Logic • PT 12 • +outboard gear
User avatar
TheCoalman
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Nashville TN

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by TheCoalman »

I've noticed this since day 1 with itunes, it just sounds horrible, I don't know what it does to the sound, but i listen to all my mixes in peak or spark. itunes sucks.
TheCoalman
G5 2.7 DP/10.4.11/3G RAM/DP 4.61/5.12/Mach 5 1.2/828/Express XT/UAD-1 4.2/Spectrasonics/EWSQ Gold/Sampletank 2.9
westla
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by westla »

I've never noticed a difference in iTunes. Whether I import a mix of mine, or a track from a commercial CD.
User avatar
Tim
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: So Cal

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by Tim »

Do you have all the sound enhancer crap in iTunes turned off?
cycless
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by cycless »

There is something like a "normalizing" function in iTunes, which leads to a lot of artifacts.

Uncheck that box.

I don‘t know how it‘s called exactly right now, I haven‘t iTunes at hand.

<small>[ June 15, 2005, 02:11 AM: Message edited by: cycless ]</small>
User avatar
amplidood
Posts: 1566
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by amplidood »

You need to turn off iTunes' Sound Enhancer in Preferences/Audio. It jacks with the EQ and tries to do some fakey widening as well. Make sure the EQ section is disabled, too (little button at bottom right of iTunes main window). Then everything will sound right again.
Jaysplace101
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Colorado

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by Jaysplace101 »

Thanks ya all!!!! I should've known that they were gonna jack with something; trying to make it sound better. "Sound Enhancer" - OFF......... "Itunes built in Massenburg EQ" - OFF!..... Now all is well! Now my friend and I won't have to call it "ipubes" anymore.

Thanks a ton!

j
RainMan034

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by RainMan034 »

Itunes adds an unnecessary reverb element. :( Itunes does suck now that I think about it. Damn.
Gerk
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Toronto

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by Gerk »

I've always had much better luck exporting AIFF or WAV from DP and then converting to MP3. Not a big fan of the lame framework, but lame itself is a great encoder .. I use LameBrain to encode all my MP3's which gives you MUCH finer grained controls.
15" Macbook Pro Retina quad 2.5Ghz 16G/512G SSD (2015 model),
Raven MTi2, 4k Vizio TV, Pegasus TB2 RAID5 (6TB),
UAD TB Apollo Twin Duo, UAD TB Satellite Octo, Tascam DM-3200/IFFW-DMII
DP 9.0.2 (Pro Tools 12.4, Logic Pro X 10.2.2), OS X 10.10.5
pcm
Posts: 869
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: woodstock, ny

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by pcm »

Try this: Take a commcial CD that you know sounds great. Import it into iTunes as an AIFF. It should sound the same (assuming you have the enhancement stuff bypassed). NOW, use iTunes to convert it to an MP3 at 128, then again at 192. Now make two addition conversions using AAC, again at 128 and 192. Now you should have five versions of this song. Using a 1-10 scale, let's assign the AIFF version a "10". What value would you give the others? Do this test and report back here.

I don't want to give the answers away just yet... :-)
Splinter
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by Splinter »

iTunes and QT use the same audio engine. There should be no difference in the playback as long as the Audio "enhancers" are off. I've found iTunes does a better job encoding mp3s at low bit rates and the LAME framework does better at medium to high bit rates.
MacBook Pro Quad 2.4GHz i7 • 10.12 • 16G RAM • DP 9 • MOTU 896HD Hybrid, Apogee Duet, & MOTU Micro Lite MIDI interface • Waves Platinum, Studio Classics Collection, Abbey Road, etc... • Fabfilter Pro-Q2 • Soundtoys FX • IK Amplitube 3, Ampeg, and TRacks 3 • Altiverb 7 • Slate Digital Everything Bundle • Stylus RMX • Komplete 10 • SampleTank 3 • Arturia V Collection • M-Audio Axiom 49
User avatar
Tim
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: So Cal

Re: itunes... DP mp3 encoding??? quality stinks

Post by Tim »

Hmmm, let's see........Do I like Suck #1, or Suck #2 ?......Hmmmmmm......
Post Reply