Shanabit,
Looks like you have some time and experience with MOTU hardware, are you going to believe every rant you read? Although I have no personal experience with the 896HD a friend has one, with no expressed complaints. Just curious why you'd want to buy two to link together, considering your existing setup. Do you need more inputs/outputs? Why not an 8 pre or another 828? Maybe you want 192k sampling? (I think this is just a novelty without much real-world benefit at this time).
I don't know, but I can't believe that the 896HD would be any worse on avereage than other lines of MOTU hardware.
Bob
896HD looks bad, Am I wrong????
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
Discussion related to installation, configuration and use of MOTU hardware such as MIDI interfaces, audio interfaces, etc. for Mac OSX
Discussion related to installation, configuration and use of MOTU hardware such as MIDI interfaces, audio interfaces, etc. for Mac OSX
- rockitcity
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Northridge, CA
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:09 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: 896HD looks bad, Am I wrong????
Shanabitshanabit wrote:Looking at a lot of posts here it appears that the 896HD has a crappy build quality, doesnt sync to other 896HD's well, Inputs going bad, random screetching sounds. Sounds like its junk to me. Correct me if Im wrong. I was thinking about getting a pair and linking them up. Your thoughts???
I had my 896HD for a long while and getting fantastic result with every project. As with most of us in the Forum, when we expand our system to include another MOTU we have to go through a bit of pain to get it right.
I was having some problems trying to sync my 896HD with the Traveler, and finally got it right after replacing the Windows XP SP2's Firewire drivers with SP1 drivers. To be fair, Microsoft should release a patch which will permanently fix this problem and they should allow for backward compatibility to their SP1 Firewire drivers. This is just not a problem with MOTU but with other brand of interfaces and also video cameras.
Last edited by hklam on Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:33 pm, edited 6 times in total.
http://myspace.com/mgstudio
Intel Core2Duo 6400, cubase sl, wavelab6, motu896HD, motu traveler, krk, mcu + xt, motu mtp/av
Intel Core2Duo 6400, cubase sl, wavelab6, motu896HD, motu traveler, krk, mcu + xt, motu mtp/av
shanabit
I would advise you to stay away from the dual motu 896hd running under the windows platform. That is my current setup. The windows driver model is not up to scratch and MOTU cannot seem to fix it. Sync is a definite issue that i have been working on for several months and still have problems with it. MOTU suggests that (4) 896 hd units can be connected together on a single firewire but i do not believe it is possible..I would like for someone to prove me wrong..And yes there is a need for more analog inputs in my opinion, my goal was 32 analog inputs (4 896 hd units) to eliminate the need for other devices/converters etc...
Why can't MOTU or some other company make a single unit that resembles the 896 hd but even say with 16 or even 24 analog inputs that are the universal type with onboard pre-amps/phantom power etc...
And not the digidesign/protools $20k version..something that the average joe can afford.....
I would advise you to stay away from the dual motu 896hd running under the windows platform. That is my current setup. The windows driver model is not up to scratch and MOTU cannot seem to fix it. Sync is a definite issue that i have been working on for several months and still have problems with it. MOTU suggests that (4) 896 hd units can be connected together on a single firewire but i do not believe it is possible..I would like for someone to prove me wrong..And yes there is a need for more analog inputs in my opinion, my goal was 32 analog inputs (4 896 hd units) to eliminate the need for other devices/converters etc...
Why can't MOTU or some other company make a single unit that resembles the 896 hd but even say with 16 or even 24 analog inputs that are the universal type with onboard pre-amps/phantom power etc...
And not the digidesign/protools $20k version..something that the average joe can afford.....
Asus PC-DL Deluxe Server Motherboard
Dual Intel Xeon 3.2 Ghz 2Mb L3 Cache 533 Fsb
Intel 875 Chipset, 4 Gb Ram, 256 Mb Agp 8X Video
Belkin Firewire Pci
Maxtor Sata 7200 rpm 16 Mb Cache 250 Gb X 3
Dual Motu 896HD Firewire Interface
Presonus Digimax LT Pre-Amp
Windows Xp Pro Sp1, Sonar 6 Producer
Native Instruments Komplete 3
Dual Intel Xeon 3.2 Ghz 2Mb L3 Cache 533 Fsb
Intel 875 Chipset, 4 Gb Ram, 256 Mb Agp 8X Video
Belkin Firewire Pci
Maxtor Sata 7200 rpm 16 Mb Cache 250 Gb X 3
Dual Motu 896HD Firewire Interface
Presonus Digimax LT Pre-Amp
Windows Xp Pro Sp1, Sonar 6 Producer
Native Instruments Komplete 3
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:09 am
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
I am just putting myself in MOTU's shoes, if I were to manufacture a 24 or 32 analog inputs interface to run at 192kHz or even 96kHz, then the product will be simply too expensive for the mass market. It will need to have a powerful DSP circuit. The modular packaging now is perfect for us home/project studio, we can upgrade or add more unit as outgrow our capacity. For a big studio (which is a dying breed), which need a lot more inputs, the equipment will be in a different class altogether. In my opinion, I don't think MOTU want to be in that market segment or plan to design something for that category of equipment.edwardb wrote:shanabit
I would advise you to stay away from the dual motu 896hd running under the windows platform. That is my current setup. The windows driver model is not up to scratch and MOTU cannot seem to fix it. Sync is a definite issue that i have been working on for several months and still have problems with it. MOTU suggests that (4) 896 hd units can be connected together on a single firewire but i do not believe it is possible..I would like for someone to prove me wrong..And yes there is a need for more analog inputs in my opinion, my goal was 32 analog inputs (4 896 hd units) to eliminate the need for other devices/converters etc...
Why can't MOTU or some other company make a single unit that resembles the 896 hd but even say with 16 or even 24 analog inputs that are the universal type with onboard pre-amps/phantom power etc...
And not the digidesign/protools $20k version..something that the average joe can afford.....
Shanabit, Trust your intuition, go for it. There are many in the Forum who has daisychained the 896HD.
Looks like I am doing a hard sell for MOTU, I hope I will get a free T-shirt one day.
http://myspace.com/mgstudio
Intel Core2Duo 6400, cubase sl, wavelab6, motu896HD, motu traveler, krk, mcu + xt, motu mtp/av
Intel Core2Duo 6400, cubase sl, wavelab6, motu896HD, motu traveler, krk, mcu + xt, motu mtp/av
Hklam.....I agree with your statements regarding hardware and cost....but....Motu should still try to make their current hardware work as their manuals say they can. I like the 896HD alot..i just want it to work correctly, right now a lot of their hardware does not work correctly under the windows platform, but they do support it, and i do not want to go out and buy a MAC.........not yet anyway.....I would suggest to new buyers to stick with a single Motu interface until the driver model gets fixed..hklam wrote:I am just putting myself in MOTU's shoes, if I were to manufacture a 24 or 32 analog inputs interface to run at 192kHz or even 96kHz, then the product will be simply too expensive for the mass market. It will need to have a powerful DSP circuit. The modular packaging now is perfect for us home/project studio, we can upgrade or add more unit as outgrow our capacity. For a big studio (which is a dying breed), which need a lot more inputs, the equipment will be in a different class altogether. In my opinion, I don't think MOTU want to be in that market segment or plan to design something for that category of equipment.edwardb wrote:shanabit
I would advise you to stay away from the dual motu 896hd running under the windows platform. That is my current setup. The windows driver model is not up to scratch and MOTU cannot seem to fix it. Sync is a definite issue that i have been working on for several months and still have problems with it. MOTU suggests that (4) 896 hd units can be connected together on a single firewire but i do not believe it is possible..I would like for someone to prove me wrong..And yes there is a need for more analog inputs in my opinion, my goal was 32 analog inputs (4 896 hd units) to eliminate the need for other devices/converters etc...
Why can't MOTU or some other company make a single unit that resembles the 896 hd but even say with 16 or even 24 analog inputs that are the universal type with onboard pre-amps/phantom power etc...
And not the digidesign/protools $20k version..something that the average joe can afford.....
Shanabit, Trust your intuition, go for it. There are many in the Forum who has daisychained the 896HD.
Looks like I am doing a hard sell for MOTU, I hope I will get a free T-shirt one day.
Asus PC-DL Deluxe Server Motherboard
Dual Intel Xeon 3.2 Ghz 2Mb L3 Cache 533 Fsb
Intel 875 Chipset, 4 Gb Ram, 256 Mb Agp 8X Video
Belkin Firewire Pci
Maxtor Sata 7200 rpm 16 Mb Cache 250 Gb X 3
Dual Motu 896HD Firewire Interface
Presonus Digimax LT Pre-Amp
Windows Xp Pro Sp1, Sonar 6 Producer
Native Instruments Komplete 3
Dual Intel Xeon 3.2 Ghz 2Mb L3 Cache 533 Fsb
Intel 875 Chipset, 4 Gb Ram, 256 Mb Agp 8X Video
Belkin Firewire Pci
Maxtor Sata 7200 rpm 16 Mb Cache 250 Gb X 3
Dual Motu 896HD Firewire Interface
Presonus Digimax LT Pre-Amp
Windows Xp Pro Sp1, Sonar 6 Producer
Native Instruments Komplete 3