Frodo wrote:qsource wrote:Frodo,
I have to admit that the more I use K2, the less I use M5.
Stan
Ah!! Someone with both!! Hmm.
Details-- me need details!
How are you using your samplers?
-- to create sounds from scratch?
-- to play back sounds only?
-- to import/convert from other formats?
What is it about K2 that lures you away from M5?
Thanks, Stan.
I haven't done any sampling (recording samples) with M5 or K2.
I have imported sounds with both VI's and Kontakt is far easier and more reliable. For example, I imported the Roland orchestra series into both. First, I imported it into M5 (because that's the one I licensed first) and none of the solo oboes imported properly, for example. They would have some ranges that seemed OK and others that did not. When I licensed K2, I almost immediately imported the Roland stuff again. This time, the solo oboes came in almost 100%.
For me, the interface to other functions is also easier to use. (More "friendly", but that's too anthropomorphic regarding software most of the time.) Multi-timbral setups, tweaking sounds (sample ranges, layers, etc.) and loop playing all seem easier in K2. YMMV.
I like the reverbs (and several other effects) in K2. Always turned them off in M5.
CPU use with M5 seemed to bop up and down without corresponding instrument usage occasionally. K2 uses CPU, but it follows the use of more instruments or more MIDI data being fed it.
Gotta get ready for the day. Hope that gives you some impressions...
Stan (QSource)
--==<<>>==--
Ethno, Ivory, Stylus RMX, Trilogy, Atmosphere,
Kontakt2, Absynth3, KLCDE
hosted in ProTools 7.1 on Mac OSX
http://muz4now.com/