Hey all!
Looking for some thoughts
I have the Presonus FaderPort 8 hooked up and it actually works ok except for the scribble strips banks not working correctly and syncing to the DP track layout
Presonus support said they do not support Digital Performer… great
So I though I am going to order the QCon Pro G2 8-channel universal DAW control surface and see if it any better
It says they have DP templates? But I read on another post that the QCon also had issue with scribble strip track names?? The QCon support tol them it was a DP issue as DP was not sending the track info?
Any thoughts??
Don
FADERPORT 8 vs QCon Pro G2 8-channel universal DAW control surface?
Moderator: James Steele
Forum rules
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
This forum is for most discussion related to the use and optimization of Digital Performer [MacOS] and plug-ins as well as tips and techniques. It is NOT for troubleshooting technical issues, complaints, feature requests, or "Comparative DAW 101."
- donreynolds
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Apollo Beach Florida
FADERPORT 8 vs QCon Pro G2 8-channel universal DAW control surface?
Mac Studio M2 OS 15.3 Sequioa, Presonus Faderport 8, 150gig Raptor x 2, Glyph 2Tb drive DP 11.33, Antelope Discrete 8, BLA microclock ll, Presonus Central Station, Waves Plat. V7 , Slate Everything, Melodyne studio, SSD 5, TruePianos, Event 20/20 bas, Adam A7, Avantone Active MixCube, and other toys, Lotsa guitars, HeadRush GTR processor and a Korg Triton)
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: Unspecified
Re: FADERPORT 8 vs QCon Pro G2 8-channel universal DAW control surface?
I had purchased the single channel Faderport and I could get one half of it or the other to work, but not both. I returned it when i saw that Presonus had dropped support for DP. I later ended up with the QCon Pro G2 8-channel and I have not had any issues with it using the Mackie Control mode.
The Digital Performer template refers to the plastic overlay, if I am understanding what you mean. That also works fine. by which I mean the buttons all work by labeled. The "Control Surfaces Help" -> Mackie Control PDF are the applicable instructions, even though they are showing a Mackie unit.
I will say this is the second time recently that I have seen someone mention DP not sending track name info (in the other case it was with FabFilter Pro-Q 4), but that also works for me, so I don't know what I am doing differently.
The Digital Performer template refers to the plastic overlay, if I am understanding what you mean. That also works fine. by which I mean the buttons all work by labeled. The "Control Surfaces Help" -> Mackie Control PDF are the applicable instructions, even though they are showing a Mackie unit.
I will say this is the second time recently that I have seen someone mention DP not sending track name info (in the other case it was with FabFilter Pro-Q 4), but that also works for me, so I don't know what I am doing differently.
Last edited by terencepalmer on Wed Feb 12, 2025 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- donreynolds
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:01 pm
- Primary DAW OS: MacOS
- Location: Apollo Beach Florida
Re: FADERPORT 8 vs QCon Pro G2 8-channel universal DAW control surface?
Thank you!
The Qcon is on it’s way!
The Qcon is on it’s way!
Mac Studio M2 OS 15.3 Sequioa, Presonus Faderport 8, 150gig Raptor x 2, Glyph 2Tb drive DP 11.33, Antelope Discrete 8, BLA microclock ll, Presonus Central Station, Waves Plat. V7 , Slate Everything, Melodyne studio, SSD 5, TruePianos, Event 20/20 bas, Adam A7, Avantone Active MixCube, and other toys, Lotsa guitars, HeadRush GTR processor and a Korg Triton)