Eucon 2.7 & DP 8.01 (64-bit): control surface tanks!
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:21 pm
greetings everyone, and a mayday from the tension headache studio.
i have been using DP8.01 in 64-bit mode and a Euphonix MC Control with no trouble - until this week.
an update for Eucon (the driver and setup configuration software for the control surface) appeared on the Euphonix / Avid website and, to my now-chagrin, i went ahead and applied it.
consequently DP in 64-bit mode no longer recognizes the MC-Control. And the Eucon driver does not appear as a choice in Control Surface Setup, so i can't re-introduce them (Eucon simply isn't on the list).
touchscreen, faders and transport controls are all knocked out entirely (soft keys are still there but i believe they must be memorized within the Eucon setup itself and therefor do not rely on the same kind of connection as the others).
Oddly enough, Eucon's setup sees DP and claims to be connected to it.
i rolled back to the last driver version that had been working for me, Eucon 2.6.1, but that did not resolve the problem (which kind of surprised me actually, but aint that just how these things go).
the control surface firmware version reports being the latest available and does not seem easily roll-backable.
If i set DP to run in 32-bit mode, everything works again. but i have 10 reasons why i would much rather run DP in 64 (one for every gig of RAM in my system over 4, to be exact). so i'm posting my troubles here to see if any among you has a recommendation or suggestion, and also to report them as a kind of warning to anyone else with a similar setup that is currently functioning but who might be about to apply this update.
i'm not terribly enthusiastic about the idea of paying Avid (Av0id?) a per-incident support fee on account of an update of theirs taking out my system. and for their part, i can also understand them being less than heroic about coming to the rescue of Digital Performer.
i'll do it if i must but first i turn to you all to see if there are any ideas out there.
respectfully yours,
O-2k
PS: i don't know whether or not the Group Mind has already discussed the topic, but if not i wonder whether you all have any personal trends you follow regarding When To Not Take The Updates.
obviously, OS security updates and OS java, you would take. but yeesh, these companies and their "improvements"! if an update claims to be recommended for users of 10.6 and up, does that actually translate as "lay the heck off" if you speak 10.6.8?
i have been using DP8.01 in 64-bit mode and a Euphonix MC Control with no trouble - until this week.
an update for Eucon (the driver and setup configuration software for the control surface) appeared on the Euphonix / Avid website and, to my now-chagrin, i went ahead and applied it.
consequently DP in 64-bit mode no longer recognizes the MC-Control. And the Eucon driver does not appear as a choice in Control Surface Setup, so i can't re-introduce them (Eucon simply isn't on the list).
touchscreen, faders and transport controls are all knocked out entirely (soft keys are still there but i believe they must be memorized within the Eucon setup itself and therefor do not rely on the same kind of connection as the others).
Oddly enough, Eucon's setup sees DP and claims to be connected to it.
i rolled back to the last driver version that had been working for me, Eucon 2.6.1, but that did not resolve the problem (which kind of surprised me actually, but aint that just how these things go).
the control surface firmware version reports being the latest available and does not seem easily roll-backable.
If i set DP to run in 32-bit mode, everything works again. but i have 10 reasons why i would much rather run DP in 64 (one for every gig of RAM in my system over 4, to be exact). so i'm posting my troubles here to see if any among you has a recommendation or suggestion, and also to report them as a kind of warning to anyone else with a similar setup that is currently functioning but who might be about to apply this update.
i'm not terribly enthusiastic about the idea of paying Avid (Av0id?) a per-incident support fee on account of an update of theirs taking out my system. and for their part, i can also understand them being less than heroic about coming to the rescue of Digital Performer.
i'll do it if i must but first i turn to you all to see if there are any ideas out there.
respectfully yours,
O-2k
PS: i don't know whether or not the Group Mind has already discussed the topic, but if not i wonder whether you all have any personal trends you follow regarding When To Not Take The Updates.
obviously, OS security updates and OS java, you would take. but yeesh, these companies and their "improvements"! if an update claims to be recommended for users of 10.6 and up, does that actually translate as "lay the heck off" if you speak 10.6.8?