Output headroom of most IO's

Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Timeline
Posts: 4910
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Fort Atkinson Hebron, Wisconsin...
Contact:

Output headroom of most IO's

Post by Timeline »

It seems the interface producing industry is dead set on producing IO's which only perform to +19. This is cheap for the manufacturers because they only use the chips output capability to drive the output. Some dual chip outputs can produce +22 though and yet the specs still say +19. I know when I had my 192s by MOTU the units did produce allot of heat so I wonder if current followers after the chips were nixed because of that.

I'm disappointed about this. I think most know and understand the benefits of headroom. If you record audio at or near top of your digital meter your levels are nearing or at clip which is unfortunate for peaks which need some breathing room, especially on live recordings.

RME has a very expensive box which does allow a +24 output but it's expensive. Prism also produces proper output headroom but take up two rack spaces, big bucks.

It seems if were ever going to be as good as analog we should at least have +22 minimum.
Last edited by Timeline on Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
2009 Intel 12 core 3.46, 64GB, OSX.10.14.6, Mojave, DP11, MTPAV, Key-station 49,(2) RME FF800,
DA-3000 DSF-5.6mhz, Mackie Control. Hofa DDP Pro, FB@ http://www.facebook.com/garybrandt2
Post Reply