Page 1 of 1
6.02 sequence editor graphic bug?
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:04 am
by EMRR
Noticing that when minimizing track height in the sequence editor that they will usually not collapse to a fully minimized size with the usual shortcut commands, and it seems to vary as to what size will be 'maximum minimization' in any given session. If I want everything as small as possible, enabling the 'all tracks' group seems to be the only thing that will let me manually drag it all to smallest size. Never saw this before 6. Anyone else?
Re: 6.02 sequence editor graphic bug?
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:30 pm
by po:recording
Well, it was there in 6.0 as well; sorry to hear it isn't fixed yet.
My solution has been to zoom everything larger/taller by a few degrees CMD + page up) and then collapse the tracks back down and they seem to squish up more completely.
What I want to know is what does 6.02 fix?
MacBook/828mkII/Traveler/Event 20/20bas
Re: 6.02 sequence editor graphic bug?
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:47 pm
by FMiguelez
.
In DP 6.01, if I press Command-Option-Down arrow everything gets as small (or large with up arrow) as possible. Works fine here... Is that the command you mean by "the usual shortcut commands"?
Re: 6.02 sequence editor graphic bug?
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:25 pm
by EMRR
Command-Down for scaling doesn't go all the way down to smallest size anymore, or consistently to any particular size. I never use Command-Option-Down; that does seem to go all the way with no scaling.
Re: 6.02 sequence editor graphic bug?
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:30 pm
by kassonica
EMRR wrote:Command-Down for scaling doesn't go all the way down to smallest size anymore, or consistently to any particular size. I never use Command-Option-Down; that does seem to go all the way with no scaling.
Does on my setup?
Strange very strange....
Re: 6.02 sequence editor graphic bug?
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:10 am
by EMRR
I'm not getting it on MBP or G5. Could it be something silly like saved state size in a template?