this looks interesting: over clocking intel Powermacs

Macintosh software/hardware discussion and troubleshooting

Moderator: James Steele

Post Reply
User avatar
kgdrum
Posts: 4068
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

this looks interesting: over clocking intel Powermacs

Post by kgdrum »

http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20080630/tc_zd/229193
have been thinking about upgrading to macintel,this looks pretty cool,except for warranty issues....................................
2012 Mac Pro 3.46GHz 12 core 96 gig,Mojave, DP11.01,Logic 10.51, RME UCX,Great River ME-1NV,a few microphones,UAD2, Komplete 12U,U-he,Omni & way too many VI's,Synths & FX galore!, Mimic Pro w/ SD3,Focal Twin 6 monitors, Shunyata...........
User avatar
monkey man
Posts: 14080
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by monkey man »

"... a Mac Pro using a 2.80 GHz processor can be overclocked to higher performance than the fastest 3.20 GHz model" ? :shock:
If it's free, I'm in! :D

Couldn't find any links on the page to further investigate.

Thank you for the heads-up, KG. :D

Mac 2012 12C Cheese Grater, OSX 10.13.6
MOTU DP8.07, MachFive 3.2.1, MIDI Express XT, 24I/O
Novation, Yamaha & Roland Synths, Guitar & Bass, Kemper Rack

Pretend I've placed your favourite quote here
User avatar
kgdrum
Posts: 4068
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: NYC

Post by kgdrum »

hi Monkey: this does looks pretty cool,

except for warranty issues....................................:shock:
it could cause problems.
I'm curious what Sdemott would think of this and if it potentially created a risk to the mac beyond the benefits???
2012 Mac Pro 3.46GHz 12 core 96 gig,Mojave, DP11.01,Logic 10.51, RME UCX,Great River ME-1NV,a few microphones,UAD2, Komplete 12U,U-he,Omni & way too many VI's,Synths & FX galore!, Mimic Pro w/ SD3,Focal Twin 6 monitors, Shunyata...........
User avatar
monkey man
Posts: 14080
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by monkey man »

Agreed; Steve knows his stuff.

More info would be helpful too.
I mean, if it's so easy and not harmful to the hardware, why isn't Apple selling the 2.8GHz -3.2GHz Mac Pro range as 3.2GHz - 3.6GHz?

My guess is that long-term reliability must have been questionable, as you'd think Apple would crank the CPUs to the safest maximum limit it could determine.

Mac 2012 12C Cheese Grater, OSX 10.13.6
MOTU DP8.07, MachFive 3.2.1, MIDI Express XT, 24I/O
Novation, Yamaha & Roland Synths, Guitar & Bass, Kemper Rack

Pretend I've placed your favourite quote here
azusa749a
Posts: 607
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Post by azusa749a »

Wow, this is great.
Too bad it's only for Leopard.
Jim
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS

Post by Jim »

"ZDNet Clock does not use any voltage increase for the CPU, the front-side bus (FSB) or the memory modules, the site said, which should not artificially degrade the components any faster than they would be."

I'm troubled by their use of the word "should." People who know more about this than I have warned that overclocking heats up cores. Heat kills.

I'd want to see some third-party proof before I'd try this at home.
Kubi

Post by Kubi »

It also messes with the system clock...

For most audio applications, processor speed increases of that magnitude shouldn't help you very much, frankly. Not worth the risk in stability. Read their FAQ, too scary for me. I'm keeping my 2.8GHz at 2.8GHz.
Post Reply