Beyerdynamic MC930 or Shure SM81 for AC GTR?

Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.

Moderator: James Steele

Forum rules
Here's where to talk about preamps, cables, microphones, monitors, etc.
Post Reply
Resonant Alien
Posts: 1374
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Unspecified

Beyerdynamic MC930 or Shure SM81 for AC GTR?

Post by Resonant Alien »

Looking for anyone who has used either (or both) a Beyerdynamic MC930 or Shure SM81 small dia. condenser on acoustic guitar. The guys over at Gearslutz seem to like the Beyer mic a lot. They also seem to like the SM81, but usually say something like "it's a great mic....for the price". I am looking for an SDC for ACGTR in the $500 range.

Thanks
RA
...
User avatar
gearboy
Posts: 1426
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Port Richmond, Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by gearboy »

I used the SM81 a lot when I was at school in the 1990s. I really loved that mic. However, when I was searching for a pair of SDCs, the SM81 was out of my range. I picked up a pair of Russian built Oktava MK-012 mics and now have a wide range of capsules for them. I'm very happy with the results.

Check this out:
gearboy wrote:Red vs. stock Oktava caps, Apogee Duet vs. BLA 828mk2...

The following files were all recorded with the same MK-012 preamp/body and 10' Monster XLR cable. I paid close attention to gain staging but of course there will be slight differences. My Taylor 310ce was miked at the 12th fret approx 6" away for each 24-bit 44.1kHz WAV file. All files are presented here with no EQ and no processing of any kind. Straight off the microphones and raw.

Apogee Duet:
Red MK-12 Capsule
Oktava MK-012 Cardioid
Oktava MK-012 Omni

MOTU 828mk2 w/ BLA mod (analog/clock):
Red MK-12 Capsule
Oktava MK-012 Cardioid
Oktava MK-012 Omni

Michael Jolly has a great reputation when it comes to making Oktava mics sound stellar. http://www.oktavamodshop.com/index.php?cPath=2_30 Mine are still stock, but will definitely be going to him this year.

Jeff
OS 10.4.11 - G5 Dual 1.8GHz, 3GB RAM / Mac PB G4 1.5GHz, 1.5GB RAM / Apogee Duet / MOTU 828mkii w/BLA Analog & Clock mod / MOTU DP4.61 / Live5.2 / Peak 4 & 5 LE / Izotope Oz3, Sp, Tr / Waves Ren Max / TRacks, Miroslav / NI Komplete 5 / GF impOSCar, MiniMonsta, M-Tron / Automat / Nomad Factory Vintage Studio Bundle / apTrigga / Audio Hijack Pro

My recording blog: http://www.ipressrecord.com
User avatar
BradLyons
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: Windows
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Post by BradLyons »

If you want clarity---spend slightly more and get the Earthworks M30. You can do anything with this microphone on acoustic instruments. Yes, it's an OMNI...but Omni's on acoustic are quite impressive!
Thank you,
Brad Lyons
db AUDIO & VIDEO
-Systems Advisor, CTS
User avatar
sdemott
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Connecticut
Contact:

Post by sdemott »

I've never been a big fan of the SM-81. It's a nice mic...not thrilling, but nice. The 81 is certainly serviceable as an acoustic guitar mic, but I prefer something more like a KM184, AT4041 or AT4051 for acoustic guitar in that price range. Of those 3 I would describe the KM184 as just a little bright, but punchy, while I'd describe both AT mics as quite bright, but with *huge* low-end and very punchy. The AT mics really sit in a mix very well with a lot of depth and sparkle.

I've yet to go the ribbon route, so I can't comment on those.

Oh, and I totally agree with Brad...it's crazy how good omnis can sound on acoustic guitar...and you can get a pair in really close without any proximity build-up. But it really depends on the sound you're after and if you can be sure that the room you record isn't going to fight you. If you need isolation (especially from the room) you may want to avoid omnis.

I will also say that I have had great success with the old Rode NT1s on stringed instruments. Way back in the day they were going for $199 a pop and I grabbed a couple of pairs. If you can find a couple to check out, it could be worth it. I know it goes against conventional wisdom to choose a LDC for acoustic guitar, but I've never been one to play by the rules...I still use the Rodes as spot mics on orchestras along side the Schoeps & DPAs and I have music directors & conductors constantly saying how good they sound.

HTH
-Steve
Not all who wander are lost.
User avatar
Tonio
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: San Diego

Post by Tonio »

Wow thats an incredible recommendation on the AT's. I always had an eye for them, but never pushed the button get a pair. Didn't know they had a good bottom. I dig my SM81 pair, they are so useful for many things. Especially with the 3 HP cuts.
Now I think I'm Jonesing fro some AT's :wink:

T
sdemott wrote:I've never been a big fan of the SM-81. It's a nice mic...not thrilling, but nice. The 81 is certainly serviceable as an acoustic guitar mic, but I prefer something more like a KM184, AT4041 or AT4051 for acoustic guitar in that price range. Of those 3 I would describe the KM184 as just a little bright, but punchy, while I'd describe both AT mics as quite bright, but with *huge* low-end and very punchy. The AT mics really sit in a mix very well with a lot of depth and sparkle.

I've yet to go the ribbon route, so I can't comment on those.

Oh, and I totally agree with Brad...it's crazy how good omnis can sound on acoustic guitar...and you can get a pair in really close without any proximity build-up. But it really depends on the sound you're after and if you can be sure that the room you record isn't going to fight you. If you need isolation (especially from the room) you may want to avoid omnis.

I will also say that I have had great success with the old Rode NT1s on stringed instruments. Way back in the day they were going for $199 a pop and I grabbed a couple of pairs. If you can find a couple to check out, it could be worth it. I know it goes against conventional wisdom to choose a LDC for acoustic guitar, but I've never been one to play by the rules...I still use the Rodes as spot mics on orchestras along side the Schoeps & DPAs and I have music directors & conductors constantly saying how good they sound.

HTH
Nigel Keay
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:38 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Paris
Contact:

Sennheiser e914 mics

Post by Nigel Keay »

I've had a couple of SM81 mics for around 20 years and they have served me well recording mostly piano, violin, viola & cello, but also formations up to small string orchestra. Last year I got a couple of Sennheiser e914 mics thinking mostly at the time of recording small orchestra with at leat 4 mics. I was amazed at the difference between the two, the SM81 mics sound dull and uninteresting by comparison, it will be hard to want to use them from now on, knowing how good the e914 sounds.

I'm a little bit familiar with the KM 184; last year my string quartet played for some workshops run by Sennheiser in conjunction with Neumann. These were workshops to teach aspects of recording (mic position etc.) to sound engineers; we were recorded by an array of Neumann mics. I was given a copy of the mixdown recording: http://www.nigelkeay.com/violist.htm (first movement of my String Quartet No.2). I also have the multitrack version with the different couples.
DP10.13, OSX 10.13.6, Melodyne Studio 4.1, Dorico Pro 3.5, Sibelius 7.1.3, MOTU Mosaic 1.5, MOTU Traveler mk1.
User avatar
sdemott
Posts: 691
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm
Primary DAW OS: MacOS
Location: Connecticut
Contact:

Post by sdemott »

for choirs, orchestras and classical ensembles I find it hard to beat the Schoeps collette series. They run about $3k a pair, but are so worth it. They are also my favorite stringed instrument mic, but not anywhere in the price range we are discussing.
-Steve
Not all who wander are lost.
Post Reply