Page 37 of 60
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:40 pm
by bOing
Historically this has always been the one thread that could be populated by "anyone" - as everyone will recall. And with such a proud, strong tradition, it is doubtful that any notion of "6", no matter how numerous or attractive, can affect a regime change in a place where all are one, not six.
We can, however, form small clusters of six, which would then be one unit of six - or a "six cluster of ones". And so forth.
So, to wrap it up, the answer is "Teflon".
(One good round of nonesense deserves another)
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:44 pm
by twistedtom
I am resisting posting in the "one thread" so far I have been doing well at keeping off of the "ONE".
Opps I slipped.
6-5=1
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:47 pm
by bOing
twistedtom wrote:I am resisting posting in the "one thread" so far I have been doing well at keeping off of the "ONE". Opps I slipped.
6-5=1
It's hard to resist, isn't it. Don't worry. You're not the only...one.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:11 pm
by Matcher
bOing wrote:
We can, however, form small clusters of six, which would then be one unit of six - or a "six cluster of ones". And so forth.
Yes, after all, the village people were one band too.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:16 pm
by billf
bOing wrote:(One good round of nonesense deserves another)
That is one interesting philosophy. It is singularly thought provoking.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:26 pm
by bOing
billf wrote:bOing wrote:(One good round of nonesense deserves another)
That is one interesting philosophy. It is singularly thought provoking.
"Waiter? Let's have one more draft for my friend, the squirrel."
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:33 pm
by billf
bOing wrote:billf wrote:bOing wrote:(One good round of nonesense deserves another)
That is one interesting philosophy. It is singularly thought provoking.
"Waiter? Let's have one more draft for my friend, the squirrel."
The squirrel always says "just one more sip and I am done. Just one more sip and I am done. Just one more..."
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:41 pm
by Matcher
Reading this thread is a bit like watching inland empire. Except, there were no squirrels, only rabbits, there's one difference. But once we've gotten all the pieces gathered into this thread, we can start ironing out some details that don't support the entirety.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:03 pm
by bOing
Matcher wrote:Reading this thread is a bit like watching inland empire. Except, there were no squirrels, only rabbits, there's one difference. But once we've gotten all the pieces gathered into this thread, we can start ironing out some details that don't support the entirety.
There is one law that can support the entirety. It's a very simple one too.
And on the 111 pg. I will post it.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:53 pm
by kassonica
well all numbers can be divided by the one
There you go
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:27 pm
by billf
Matcher wrote:Reading this thread is a bit like watching inland empire. Except, there were no squirrels, only rabbits, there's one difference. But once we've gotten all the pieces gathered into this thread, we can start ironing out some details that don't support the entirety.
One difference is all that is required in this thread. Just one.
boing wrote:There is one law that can support the entirety. It's a very simple one too.
And on the 111 pg. I will post it.
Page 111 is one page after page 110.
kassonica wrote:well all numbers can be divided by the one
And multiplied too. That is one flexible number.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:38 pm
by bOing
We sure are one numeric bunch.
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:44 am
by Matcher
It's almost one a'clock here in Finland.
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:02 am
by kassonica
well it's 11 Pm in australia so double the one.....
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:21 am
by twistedtom
bOing wrote:We sure are one numeric bunch.
We are ONE fine bunch.