I'm surprised they wouldn't have replied or contacted you directly.I would think MOTU would have taken this seriously

Moderator: James Steele
Thank you very much MEmidnight_engineer wrote:I called MOTU on Feb 8th and talked to a service rep and he said he would forward the message that I had solved my noise issue. To date, I have received no call back. Also, I posted a techlink on Feb 9th on MOTU’s site which remains "unread" to this day, Feb 27th. I said I would wait two weeks in a prior PM, so off we go….
Me, and a great friend, modified my unit on Feb 7th. I've been running it off and on for hours at a time over the past several weeks with no problems. The mod appears to work. I’m passing this on just in case I happen to pass on.
BACKGROUND: The Power Supply Board (PSB) is distinct from Main Board (MB). Utilizing a low impedance Shure Sm7b placed in an anechoic chamber, approx 60mV of 1500-1600 Hz AC shows up on several of the dual header jumpers between PSB to MB, those specifically labeled 3.3, 3.8 and 5. All of these pins have actual DC slightly higher than labeled. I assume this provides headroom for downstream regulation on the MB. The PSB corruption is easily audible at high gain thru the headphone jack and is recorded.
My power supply board is labeled "PS-3501" rev4, layout dated as 2006. The PSB is a pulse-width modulated switcher with error feedback wherein the dc output is continuously compared to a reference and pulse width is adjusted accordingly. In this case, the PSB utilizes an optical coupler, precision reference, and amplifier in one handy chip.
http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/FO/FOD2741A.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The 896mk3 PSB closely resembles the "typical application" in the data sheet. Be cautious studying this datasheet as my cohort noticed that Figures 7 and 8 have the opamp pins incorrectly labeled. I could easily examine the PSB feedback oscillation with an ac-coupled scope probe on U1 pins 6, 7, and 8. Pins 6 & 7 exhibit a sinusoidal waveform and Pin 8 is asymmetrically compressed. Since we only want pure dc out of the PSB, this feedback signal needs to be clean and, ideally, it should only waiver as the MB load rapidly varies. From my experience, the layout of the PSB should have the compensation network much closer to the chip. Component changes or a new layout would be a “better” fix but at least there is an “easy” fix , we need to simply add a part.
SOLUTION: A very similar chip is shown in
http://www.scantec.de/uploads/media/Fly ... ration.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Specifically, Figure 3 “Control Loop Section at the Output” provides for an additional capacitor. The cap connects between pins 6 & 7. We added a X7R 4700pF, 10%, 50 Volt capacitor to PSB U1. We used a small surface mount part but you can use anything non-polarized that will fit nicely - a 1206, 0805 or even a thru-hole part. Adding this cap lowers the oscillation amplitude on pins 6, 7, & 8 and moves the dominant frequency to well over 300kHz which is well above Nyquist frequency for the highest onboard sample rate. Better yet, the oscillation is NOT AT ALL EVIDENT on the PSB to MB jumpers due to the existing output filtering and so it can only be found on the feedback network after the mod.
PHYSICAL IMAGE: http://s1095.photobucket.com/albums/i46 ... gineering/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Regards,
ME
I'm a little skeptical that tolerances are the cause, but may Motu convince me...Spencil_Splodge wrote:Hi all,
I have some fantastic news!
I have been in touch with someone from Motu's QA department and they have found the cause of the issue to be related to manufacturing tolerances. Basically, not all units have the issue but a fair few will. They have now implemented a change to the units (probably along the lines of Midnight_Engineer's suggestion!) so all units coming out from manufacturing from this point will be good regardless of the tolerance problems - I guess the tolerance issue is related to the Switching Power Supply.
I will eventually have a replacement unit that has the issue resolved and I will post again with what I expect to be gloriously tone-free news.
My sincere thanks to Midnight_Engineer for your efforts and helping to push this issue through (and of course Klaus for your initial test results!) and to Motu too for working hard on this, implementing a solution and offering me fantastic support. I doubt all companies would be quite so open with an issue like this and turnaround a fix and associated support in the time frame Motu have. I know not everyone whom posts here has something good to say about Motu support, but for me I've had a really good experience with it.
Cheers,
Spence.