Page 3 of 3

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:25 pm
by stubbsonic
mikehalloran wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:45 pm
"It will be the best notation app and that it's free will be icing on the cake."
Someone should remind them that there's no such thing as free. We'll pay one way or another.

I don't love the idea of a notation program that will make me want to take a shower after I use it. ('cuz I won't feel clean.)

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:53 pm
by mikehalloran
stubbsonic wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:25 pm
mikehalloran wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:45 pm
"It will be the best notation app and that it's free will be icing on the cake."
Someone should remind them that there's no such thing as free. We'll pay one way or another.

I don't love the idea of a notation program that will make me want to take a shower after I use it. ('cuz I won't feel clean.)
Yeah, the handicapped shower in my hotel was nice and big with multiple jets—it took awhile.

Muse Group is very profitable, has bought the largest music publisher in the world and are getting ready to purchase the largest sheet music reseller in the world. Hmmm... Did I say that last part? looking around for any NDA.. Nope! Audacity, likewise, will remain free for similar reasons. Will they heed my advice that pro apps have live support? I don't know.

Nobody is making money on notation apps and that includes Yamaha/Steinberg and AVID/Sibelius. AVID wants to suck everyone into ProTools while Yamaha has their own world. Peaksware has decided that Finale no longer meets any of Alfred's revenue goals. Had they not come to the rescue, it's probable that Finale 2011 or 2012 would have been the last version of Finale ever — the source code was for sale but nobody wanted it.

The really big money in the Music Business is Publishing and Performance Rights. Muse Group hasn't launched a PRO yet but I expect that they will. Not to do so will be stupid.

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 5:07 am
by Phil O
Frodo wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 3:01 am One odd thing with importing musxml files is that Dorico doesn't seem to know what to do with Finale's measure number formatting. Having to go through each import and fix the measure number placement and format is very time consuming and slows down the transition process. I don't want to complain too much because I have found Dorico a bit more approachable than Sibelius, which I felt compelled to try a few years ago.
Yeah I've run into the measure number issue too. Also, Dorico doesn't recognize Finale's custom rehearsal marks. I use Verse, Chorus, Bridge, etc. as custom rehearsal marks for lead sheets and Dorico substitutes A, B, C. I tried a trial version of Sibelius as well and wasn't impressed. I think Dorico will do what I need but after using Finale for so many years, learning it will be painful. :(

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 9:20 am
by stubbsonic
For those who haven't seen it, it might be helpful context to (re)visit this vid from 5 years ago, critiquing the UI design of MuseScore (v3). It does provide some illuminating context for the others. The style is goofy and wanders around with sight-gags-aplenty; but it is kind of worthwhile viewing for those who are interested in such things.


Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:21 pm
by MIDI Life Crisis
mikehalloran wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:45 pm Having been a Finale user since v.1 in 1989, I imagine that it will be my go-to until I can't.
Eggzactly! I started with Finale in 1996 and took to it right away. It thinks like do about music and aside from Frodo's observation about idiosyncrasies, it works well for me. I'm soaking it in now in a 90 minute score for a small ensemble. I am determined to stay on Mojave as long as possible. Otherwise I lose all my Adobe creative stuff as well as Word and Quicken (well, lose them to subscriptions, which are ridiculous, IMO).

I don't see what the big deal is about Finale not being updated as long as it continues to work. I also HATE the other notation apps almost as much as I hated Dr. T and a dot matrix printer. Just sayin'

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2025 8:10 pm
by mhschmieder
With the release this week of MuseScore-specific sound packs from Vienna Symphonic Library, I'm afraid the prophets (profits?) may have been correct when they stated that MS is the inevitable future, not Doritos.

I am going through the process tonight, of cataloguing all my true scores (as opposed to MIDI files tweaked in DP for reasonably useful lead sheets as PDF export), to see how many apps they are dispersed between.

As I will be switching my 2017 Intel iMac to a 2025 Silicon Mac Studio very soon, I am facing the piper and deleting dead apps that won't transfer, which unfortunately includes Finale at this point.

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2025 8:53 am
by mikehalloran
mhschmieder wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 8:10 pm With the release this week of MuseScore-specific sound packs from Vienna Symphonic Library, I'm afraid the prophets (profits?) may have been correct when they stated that MS is the inevitable future, not Doritos.

I am going through the process tonight, of cataloguing all my true scores (as opposed to MIDI files tweaked in DP for reasonably useful lead sheets as PDF export), to see how many apps they are dispersed between.

As I will be switching my 2017 Intel iMac to a 2025 Silicon Mac Studio very soon, I am facing the piper and deleting dead apps that won't transfer, which unfortunately includes Finale at this point.
What version of Finale are you running?

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2025 7:28 pm
by mhschmieder
I forget what version I had (it was whatever the latest update was); I deleted it from my system late last night. I'm a strong believer in moving on and adapting. If I wasn't so super-busy with my career and with constant gigs, rehearsals, and recording sessions, and had time for regular use of notation apps, I would probably be more inclined to keep a legacy system alive for Finale -- especially if my "perpetual" licenses to Adobe apps were still honored.

I just now ordered my M4 Max Studio, which should arrive in mid-June. I only did the 1 TB SSD upgrade from the base model after a compelling in-depth video linked at GS the other day, that showed every conceivable maxed-out workflow and the impact of anything more than 32 GB of RAM in the context of Apple Silicon systems (a different story for modern Intel!).

I suppose I'll eventually have to adapt to MuseScore, as much as I detest it, but surely it will also improve once it becomes the de facto monopoly and effectively a public domain tool with major composers and publishers dependent on it. The writing on the wall was probably when they purchased one of the three largest publishers on the planet.

What I hate most about the modern notation choices is the impact on sheet music, where you can rarely get a preview before purchase, but buying a score from Schott can cost $80 or more so I suppose most of us will resort to online scores sooner than later. There's a Bruch trio for clarinet, violin, and viola, that I've wanted for several years. I don't dare buy the MuseScore version, not being able to view it first to verify the quality.

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Fri May 02, 2025 11:50 pm
by mikehalloran
mhschmieder wrote: Mon Apr 28, 2025 7:28 pm I forget what version I had (it was whatever the latest update was); I deleted it from my system late last night. I'm a strong believer in moving on and adapting. If I wasn't so super-busy with my career and with constant gigs, rehearsals, and recording sessions, and had time for regular use of notation apps, I would probably be more inclined to keep a legacy system alive for Finale -- especially if my "perpetual" licenses to Adobe apps were still honored.

I just now ordered my M4 Max Studio, which should arrive in mid-June. I only did the 1 TB SSD upgrade from the base model after a compelling in-depth video linked at GS the other day, that showed every conceivable maxed-out workflow and the impact of anything more than 32 GB of RAM in the context of Apple Silicon systems (a different story for modern Intel!).
If audio, I quite agree—one can get by on 16GB unified RAM and have projects with over 300 tracks of audio and VIs.

That changes when doing AV or AI, big time. I felt the effects of having only 192GB RAM while editing a 4 hour documentary last week — but an hour for rendering was acceptable. OTOH, I was using some AI tools to mock up a 3.5 minute choral piece just to see what it was like. When each voice took over 45 minutes to render, I understood why the M4 Studio Ultra is now available with 512GB RAM — if I was doing these for a client, I’d have one of those on order.
I suppose I'll eventually have to adapt to MuseScore, as much as I detest it, but surely it will also improve once it becomes the de facto monopoly and effectively a public domain tool with major composers and publishers dependent on it. The writing on the wall was probably when they purchased one of the three largest publishers on the planet.
Hal Leonard is the largest. It was a twelve figure deal. The real money in music is publishing anymore.
What I hate most about the modern notation choices is the impact on sheet music, where you can rarely get a preview before purchase, but buying a score from Schott can cost $80 or more so I suppose most of us will resort to online scores sooner than later. There's a Bruch trio for clarinet, violin, and viola, that I've wanted for several years. I don't dare buy the MuseScore version, not being able to view it first to verify the quality.
The biggest problem with MuseScore is that so many users haven’t a frickin’ clue how to lay out a score and parts. You see ignorant crap like fermata over bar lines instead of caesura and dotted slurs & dotted bar lines everywhere—unnecessary and confusing as hell. At least, when I order from JW Pepper, I get to send things back—and I do with explanations why.: “Sorry, I can’t put this in front of my choir. Please fix this so that it isn’t confusing.” What’s really bad is that these armchair engravers actually sign their crap… at least I know whom to avoid.

Dorico at least tries to adhere to Elaine Gould—that’s in their mission statement. There are huge gaps in her rules but a lot of the nonsense that plagues MuseScore isn’t possible in Dorico unless you override settings during engraving. If you’re gonna screw up, it has to be done on purpose. During my meeting with Muse Group at NAMM, I told them as much. People like I are getting tired of buying unedited, illegible scores.

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 5:12 am
by labman
mikehalloran wrote: Fri May 02, 2025 11:50 pm
The biggest problem with MuseScore is that so many users haven’t a frickin’ clue how to lay out a score and parts.
amen. true. pass the bacon

Re: Bye, bye Finale

Posted: Sat May 03, 2025 9:12 am
by mhschmieder
Fortunately, I don't do AV or AI based video work, and haven't done any audio-for-video in a while anyway as the indie filmmaker I worked with died. Whatever I do in that realm anymore is for my own bands, just to edit audio for filmed concerts. The thorough video that was linked at GS does hit that one wall, and says so. The amazing thing is that it is the ONLY wall.

I bought and installed and launched Dorico 6 last night. As I am leaving for a DC festival gig in a couple of hours, I won't have time until tonight or tomorrow to use it on a score that I was just about to update anyway, but I did do a few quick tests last night and it does seem to have improved engraving and marks, in cursory review.