They may have increased the resolution (esp. of inter-snapshot interpolation?) of the convolution engine too, RA.Resonant Alien wrote:Maybe to a degree, but I dunno - they have added a ton of new amp models and FX over the years, and there was definitely a noticeable improvement in sonic quality going from the 2.0 generation to the xt models. I will be curious to see if the new converters and better processors have a noticeable effect in the X3 series.
Do you think we've given it long enough to assume they're done with the bass series? I'd be one of those you mentioned who would indeed save money, MIDI ports, desk channels and DAW inputs, so it'd be fine by me. Do bass players need more than 28 amps these days? LOL
I agree that many emulations over the years seem to have relied on phase-shifts as principle tone identifiers. Knarly, small, twisted tones many of them were IMHO.markwayne wrote:I hear you on that issue. Line6 (and Roland and Sansamp, etc.) seem to think that the only thing that four 12" speakers in a single cab does is cause a phase issue that adds that peaky, mid-range bite. I have an old GP100 that I love but their "stack" model should be labeled "whack" model. They all seem to exaggerate that (in my experience) subtle off-axis phase effect to the point where everything starts to sound the same. I prefer the speaker emulation of my old Red Boxes to that.
I stumbled across some posts from gospel/worship guitarists not too long ago who swore by the POD beans. They'd run 'em direct and use a wedge or two for monitoring. All claimed that it did wonders for stage levels, which in many of those bands is critical as they often comprise many members and choirs are usually on hand too.markwayne wrote:After trying to make my POD play nice with tube power amps for quite a while in a live setting, I recently started just running it into a Crown power amp and a little Yamaha floor monitor. It's much easier to dial in a consistent tone now.
Makes sense to me. If I were playing guitar live, I'd certainly give it a go. You'd think that consistency of sound would be easier to achieve this way than when micing a cab up in different venues each time. (Just MHO)
Makes sense too; I wouldn't expect a huge difference though, especially with the X3.markwayne wrote:I also recently started recording my POD via USB and using it as my input device for guitar tracks. It seems silly with Mytek converters sitting in the same room. But I think the POD actually sounds better when you bypass its DA.
Makes sense - the skinny and fat combo - ideally a smiley scoop on one side and a mid-range band pass on the other, IMHO. Try it if you haven't already.markwayne wrote:Sometimes it's nice to record a track with cab emulation on and then record another pass with it off and mix to taste. The two don't stomp all over each other that way.
Looks that way to me too, Wayne, although I think L6 has done just enough in other departments to get away with it. I've refused to buy in to all extras so far though, and the X3 Pro sounds like it includes all those "model packs" and plenty of stomp boxes, so the wait may well have been worth it. The MIDI ports, VariAxe input, live dry split and sysex-dump capabilities of the new unit will determine whether or not I stick with my old PODs. If this unit is the last ever from L6 to feature MIDI ports, it'll likely be the last L6 unit I buy, period.markwayne wrote:Oh yeah, and to get back to Mr. Monkey's OP: I kind of feel like Line6 has largely been involved in a game of repackaging Amp Farm technology for the last ten years or so. I mean most of their changes at this point seem to be stuffing more of the same into a package that's cheaper to build.
just my opinion,
Wayne