I too gave him the benefit of the doubt, but the tone of the original post suggested he was trolling. Maybe we need a troll emoticon?FMiguelez wrote:I didn't want to jump too quickly to conclusions (as I usually do and get in trouble for this)... but he did imply his old MachFive did not require an iLok, which has been proved to be a lie.AnthonyS wrote: Maybe just a bit more info would help....if it's a legitimate product, that is! Methinks maybe a pirate in our midst?
So the question would be, how did he manage to get his first version of MachFive to work WITHOUT an iLok?
![]()
![]()
![]()
No wonder he thinks it sucks now

I purchased the MachFive2 upgrade (or crossgrade) and it came with an iLok key. No separate chip. Installation was rather easy.
He still hasn't explained exactly what his issue is?